I read this essay a short while ago and it encapsulates my own feelings quite well. I sent a copy to some friends. One of the Guardian readers said "As for Prof Bendell’s essay - he is a controversial figure with no medical background so I think it’s unwise to rely on his thoughts." This argument from authority is common but there's also a hint that they don't know (or want to know) how widespread these opinions are and how well-grounded they are in evidence. I believe they'll come round eventually (we're still talking!).
Jim - your friend is obviously entrapped in a mindset that seems to especially afflict Guardian readers. He is impelled to maintain his ‘world-view’ at all costs in order to avoid the psychological collapse that would be triggered by acceptance of the reality of the nightmare that the injectables are creating.
However, the same entrapment also applies to most people who uncritically consume the corporate media. They just assume that the talking heads they see on the TV every night reading ‘The News’ from a teleprompter are actually describing the real world, whereas all they are doing is projecting an illusion - if not an orchestrated litany of lies.
The issue now at hand is how to overcome the fear-based psychological programming that has been applied to the whole population by the injectables protagonists and their political enablers – who in my country (Australia), have full control of the corporate media. It is obvious now that people in the medical profession were the first to be targeted - they had to be taken out early. Even now, very few ordinary doctors would understand how their minds were played with by experts at psychological manipulation. Most must now be living in a state of hyper-denial.
I lived through a psychological manipulation event something like this once before and it came as an almighty shock to me, because I had always assumed that our society was based on ‘fair dealing’. In 1989, my colleagues and I in Australia were targeted by an intense, politically-driven, negative media campaign during a major airline industry industrial dispute. It went on for over six months. The billionaire corporate boss who drove the campaign had effectively bought the political party in power – and therefore had control of the Australian parliament. He was receiving strategic & tactical advice on how to achieve his objective from a psychologist that he had imported from then-Communist Hungary. That objective was essentially the destruction of the pilot’s union.
In the end, the politicised media campaign only partly achieved its original objectives, because the Hungarian psychologist did not appreciate that the psychological make-up of Australians was different to that of Europeans – once the Australian pilots’ backs were up against the wall. The psychological collapse of the pilots as a group was expected to occur within a couple of weeks - but it never happened. In the end only about 30% were psychologically crushed and were lost to the group, but the majority held out – most eventually leaving the country to take up jobs overseas.
Instead the financial assets of the airlines involved began to bleed uncontrollably. In the end, the huge corporation that carried out that assault on us, our families, and our culture, had to be wound up - it no longer exists. The corporate boss who drove the whole thing died a few years later, a despised individual, with his international empire shattered.
The psychological techniques used that crushed many of the targeted individuals severely damaged the Australian airline industry, which took many years to even partly recover. I suspect that many doctors may find themselves in a fragile state of mind in the future for not standing up to the evil that has been perpetrated on their patients.
My memories of those events linger on as a receding nightmare. But one result for me was that - for the first time - I came to understand that the world presented by the media every night on the ‘News’ was just a distortion of reality – a fabrication - and that the media industry is simply populated by platoons of professional liars who are for sale.
There must be a lesson to be learnt from our hour of agony all those years ago. The thing that shocked me most was the fact that most of the public just believed the media lies that were being pushed out, but deep down, many had an uneasy feeling that something didn’t add up. That may be the clue in how to beat City Hall in the long run – to target those nagging doubts by just keep highlighting the facts about the damage being done – especially the de-facto sterilisation of women of child-bearing age that is being wrought by the toxic injectables. That is an unforgivable crime and demands a Nuremberg 2.
My thoughts are that there will be no quick turnaround in the public understanding of the historic crime that has been perpetrated, however resistance and the facts need to continue to be strongly voiced in order to expose those responsible, and to ensure that justice will be served on them – especially the spineless public health officials who made it all possible. One of them was named in the Australian Senate in a brilliant recent speech by a Senator Rennick – however the speech was not reported in the Australian corporate media, despite the fact that it went viral in other countries. We are living in a time of great crisis.
A typical 'attack the person, not the message' response from your friend. Professor Bendell is only 'controversial' because he had the courage to look at the actual science, rather than blindly accept received Covid dogma. If your friend bothered to look at the actual science, rather than be misinformed by the Guardian, he would discover that what Bendell is saying is entirely factual, and not just the 'thoughts of a controversial figure'.
I read this essay a short while ago and it encapsulates my own feelings quite well. I sent a copy to some friends. One of the Guardian readers said "As for Prof Bendell’s essay - he is a controversial figure with no medical background so I think it’s unwise to rely on his thoughts." This argument from authority is common but there's also a hint that they don't know (or want to know) how widespread these opinions are and how well-grounded they are in evidence. I believe they'll come round eventually (we're still talking!).
Jim - your friend is obviously entrapped in a mindset that seems to especially afflict Guardian readers. He is impelled to maintain his ‘world-view’ at all costs in order to avoid the psychological collapse that would be triggered by acceptance of the reality of the nightmare that the injectables are creating.
However, the same entrapment also applies to most people who uncritically consume the corporate media. They just assume that the talking heads they see on the TV every night reading ‘The News’ from a teleprompter are actually describing the real world, whereas all they are doing is projecting an illusion - if not an orchestrated litany of lies.
The issue now at hand is how to overcome the fear-based psychological programming that has been applied to the whole population by the injectables protagonists and their political enablers – who in my country (Australia), have full control of the corporate media. It is obvious now that people in the medical profession were the first to be targeted - they had to be taken out early. Even now, very few ordinary doctors would understand how their minds were played with by experts at psychological manipulation. Most must now be living in a state of hyper-denial.
I lived through a psychological manipulation event something like this once before and it came as an almighty shock to me, because I had always assumed that our society was based on ‘fair dealing’. In 1989, my colleagues and I in Australia were targeted by an intense, politically-driven, negative media campaign during a major airline industry industrial dispute. It went on for over six months. The billionaire corporate boss who drove the campaign had effectively bought the political party in power – and therefore had control of the Australian parliament. He was receiving strategic & tactical advice on how to achieve his objective from a psychologist that he had imported from then-Communist Hungary. That objective was essentially the destruction of the pilot’s union.
In the end, the politicised media campaign only partly achieved its original objectives, because the Hungarian psychologist did not appreciate that the psychological make-up of Australians was different to that of Europeans – once the Australian pilots’ backs were up against the wall. The psychological collapse of the pilots as a group was expected to occur within a couple of weeks - but it never happened. In the end only about 30% were psychologically crushed and were lost to the group, but the majority held out – most eventually leaving the country to take up jobs overseas.
Instead the financial assets of the airlines involved began to bleed uncontrollably. In the end, the huge corporation that carried out that assault on us, our families, and our culture, had to be wound up - it no longer exists. The corporate boss who drove the whole thing died a few years later, a despised individual, with his international empire shattered.
The psychological techniques used that crushed many of the targeted individuals severely damaged the Australian airline industry, which took many years to even partly recover. I suspect that many doctors may find themselves in a fragile state of mind in the future for not standing up to the evil that has been perpetrated on their patients.
My memories of those events linger on as a receding nightmare. But one result for me was that - for the first time - I came to understand that the world presented by the media every night on the ‘News’ was just a distortion of reality – a fabrication - and that the media industry is simply populated by platoons of professional liars who are for sale.
There must be a lesson to be learnt from our hour of agony all those years ago. The thing that shocked me most was the fact that most of the public just believed the media lies that were being pushed out, but deep down, many had an uneasy feeling that something didn’t add up. That may be the clue in how to beat City Hall in the long run – to target those nagging doubts by just keep highlighting the facts about the damage being done – especially the de-facto sterilisation of women of child-bearing age that is being wrought by the toxic injectables. That is an unforgivable crime and demands a Nuremberg 2.
My thoughts are that there will be no quick turnaround in the public understanding of the historic crime that has been perpetrated, however resistance and the facts need to continue to be strongly voiced in order to expose those responsible, and to ensure that justice will be served on them – especially the spineless public health officials who made it all possible. One of them was named in the Australian Senate in a brilliant recent speech by a Senator Rennick – however the speech was not reported in the Australian corporate media, despite the fact that it went viral in other countries. We are living in a time of great crisis.
A typical 'attack the person, not the message' response from your friend. Professor Bendell is only 'controversial' because he had the courage to look at the actual science, rather than blindly accept received Covid dogma. If your friend bothered to look at the actual science, rather than be misinformed by the Guardian, he would discover that what Bendell is saying is entirely factual, and not just the 'thoughts of a controversial figure'.