Remember When Witless, Unbalanced and Pol Pot Belly Told Us They Were 'Following The Science'? Well . . . . .
Reposting this November 2022 essay by Professor Jem Bendell, picked up on by Dr Paul Alexander. It encapsulates the madness and the badness of the whole coerced mass vaccination campaign. In the UK, the first country in the world to start jabbing people, this was very evident from an early stage, but the warning signs were ignored. I want to see Whitty, Vallance, Johnson, June Raine (MHRA) etc. in court on charges of deliberately misleading the public. I want to see NHS managers charged with lying to the public about the supposed ‘benefits’ of these vaccines, in particular their bare-faced assertion that 70-80% of the population needed to be jabbed in order to get to herd immunity. The damage they have done is immense and is still being added up. It involves a lot of dead bodies and critically injured people. Never forget what Pol Pot Belly said in 2021 when he was still Prime Minister: “Nobody is safe until we are all safe”. We need accountability. We need Nuremberg 2. In the UK and across the world.
It is why in this essay I am returning to the scientific facts which prove the medical authoritarian orthodoxy on Covid has been scientifically wrong. Not just wrong in hindsight, but now more widely recognised as wrong by experts and scientists who ignored some of the earlier concerns. This recent science can’t be ignored unless someone is no longer interested in the science on public health.
The first thing to recognise is the Covid vaccinations offered neither significant transmission reductions nor an opportunity to speed the reaching of ‘herd immunity’ and thus the eradication of the disease. Therefore, the various means of persuasion and coercion of people to achieve mass vaccination were scientifically baseless. The science on that now seems irrefutable. On transmission, it was confirmed in the European Parliament that the manufacturers did not test for impact of vaccination on infection and/or transmission rates. Therefore, any public statements and policies on reduced infection and transmission were not informed by science. The public statements on the role of mass vaccination in helping eradicate the disease via achieving ‘herd immunity’ were also unscientific.
‘Following the science’ my arse!
I read this essay a short while ago and it encapsulates my own feelings quite well. I sent a copy to some friends. One of the Guardian readers said "As for Prof Bendell’s essay - he is a controversial figure with no medical background so I think it’s unwise to rely on his thoughts." This argument from authority is common but there's also a hint that they don't know (or want to know) how widespread these opinions are and how well-grounded they are in evidence. I believe they'll come round eventually (we're still talking!).