Do an internet search. You will find very little information on the actual ignition source of the Hawaii wildfires; plenty of speculation on what made the fires so intense and why they spread so rapidly, more than a few publications willing to link the fires with ‘climate change’ in the absence of any solid evidence whatsoever. 89 people have tragically lost their lives so far and this figure is sure to increase significantly. Investigating what might have started the blazes should surely be a top priority, no? Certainly a lot more important than baseless speculation about ‘climate change’. You would think that the Governor of Hawaii would be more keen to know the source of ignition of the fires which have devastated Hawaii, rather than plug the ‘climate change did it’ narrative, but that’s not the case.
John Leake's brother informs us that the afternoon fire was close to the original brush fire, but nearer to town. So it would seem that the original fire was contained and another ignited at 3.30pm. This destroyed Lahaina and has killed possibly many hundreds of people. The final death toll looks like it will be horrific.
"In delivering supplies to Lahaina, my brother spoke with several people on the ground, and they all told him that the final death count is going to be MUCH higher than is being reported in the media. Most of the town’s residents were caught completely by surprise because the initial fire up the hill from town was declared contained at 9:00 a.m. However, another fire in the same area, but closer to town, apparently flared up at 3:30 p.m., and strong winds quickly pushed it into town."
I think its Directed Energy Weapons, DEW. From satellites I guess.
We are not talking aliens, that's just psyop BS.
It couldn't be China either, at least not without the complicity of the U.S. DoD.
No, I think this is proof that there is a world government apparatus already in place.
That apparatus is in control of the U.S. DoD.
This is consistent with the Covid operation being perpetrated by the U.S. DoD, at least in the U.S.
Its a depopulation agenda. They are not using DEW to directly depopulate, but to support the climate change narrative, which will be used to depopulate.
Its about control, not money. They already control the central banks.
I don't think a world government apparatus cares too much about Lahaina real estate.
Why would they use a multi-million dollar directed energy weapon in earth orbit to start wildfires when they can just get someone with a box of matches to do it? That I don't understand.
Money doesn't matter to the BIS and its minions, including the U.S. DoD, because they can just print more, so it probably comes down to their perceptions of reliability, secrecy and believability.
In terms of reliability, its probably much more reliable to start "wildfires" with DEW.
In terms of secrecy, its probably hard to depend on a group of arsonists, and it probably would have to be a group in such a wet climate. Not only would the arsonists have to be foolhardy enough to undertake it, but they would also have to be reliable, a tricky combination.
With DEW, most people wouldn't be aware of the possibility, which makes it hard to believe, and any smoking gun witnessing would probably have to be done by another agency or government with the ability to record and interpret events in space. Pictures of circles of fire taken from aircraft, and expert interpretation of the fires spread and effects can, at least for a while, be passed off as conspiracy theory if enough propaganda is applied.
Time is important because the public memory is so short, and if it goes down as "climate change" before it goes down as DEW, then they probably would call that a win.
I had to look at the link to the Holocaust Museum to verify the three key decrees implemented by ‘authorities’… “emergency legislation was needed to prevent…” and “For the Protection of the People and State”, “Using emergency constitutional powers,” interesting words that changed the world then and perhaps again soon.
You mean like lockdowns, compulsory masking, vaccine passports, vaccinations that are observed to cause more harm than good and various other restrictions for little more than a bad cold?
That's really sad. Perhaps this was not a preventable disaster but a hell of a lot more could have been done to minimise the risk of it happening. One sentence stands out:
"Finally, there are documented instances on Maui in which public announcements of heightened fire risk have, paradoxically, inspired criminally disordered individuals to commit acts of arson."
This paradox (notification and warnings of high fire hazard) has been a problem for fire authorities for decades.
One semantic detail to add: When a fire is said to have been contained, it simply means a perimeter has been established and no further lateral spread is expected. While the term controlled is used to indicate all hot spots close enough to the perimeter which may cause a spot fire outside the line have been extinguished. When winds exceed 20 mph, spot fires are frequent, at 80 mph spot fires can occur great distances down wind (1/4 mile to upwards of 1 to 2 miles) as embers are lofted and carried to any available fuel downwind. These spots, and radiant heat would certainly ignite boats in the harbor.
The cause will most likely be kept elusively quiet for some time. Partly because it can be difficult to determine with certainty. But most likely because that cause will be from one of two protected classes, the ever growing homeless population, or the green nanny state subsidized energy utility.
Given the tragic loss of life, and also the economic costs of the fire, one might think that a top priority of the authorities would be to establish the cause of the blaze, with a view to trying to work out how to minimise the risk of it happening again.
Unfortunately the climate change narrative trumps everything.
It's pretty sick Mark. You can't control the weather or the climate, but you can certainly mitigate against sources of ignition and mitigate against uncontrolled spread.
To me, it looks like a precedent-setting an example of how we can expect them to react to upcoming disasters. They are not in it together.
probably a test for the climate change narrative.
too many questions and no answers. So much for truth to power.
https://wltreport.com/2023/08/12/somethings-not-right-hawaiis-world-best-alarm-system/
Powerful testimony from a woman trapped in Lahaina for 4 days: https://twitter.com/wolsned/status/1690744517857611776?t=dineLrWAEa9_OqD74lYvag&s=19.
Here’s another: https://twitter.com/Inversionism/status/1690550232675688449?t=iIQl_C3rX3L_pq6h-LJH4w&s=19.
"Directed energy weapon" attack - on Maui?
Why?
Looks like a load of conspiranoid fantasy to me!
I can't make head nor tail of all this 'directed energy weapon' chatter. It just seems weird to me.
Excellent work!
John Leake's brother informs us that the afternoon fire was close to the original brush fire, but nearer to town. So it would seem that the original fire was contained and another ignited at 3.30pm. This destroyed Lahaina and has killed possibly many hundreds of people. The final death toll looks like it will be horrific.
"In delivering supplies to Lahaina, my brother spoke with several people on the ground, and they all told him that the final death count is going to be MUCH higher than is being reported in the media. Most of the town’s residents were caught completely by surprise because the initial fire up the hill from town was declared contained at 9:00 a.m. However, another fire in the same area, but closer to town, apparently flared up at 3:30 p.m., and strong winds quickly pushed it into town."
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/goodbye-lahaina-post-script
Exactly by the same at the almost continuous Eastern Canadian fires that were obviously set.
Unfortunately it's cheap and easy to have a few antifa type shitbags with 6 gallon diesel containers on call.
Ed Dowd also lives on Maui. Perhaps an implied warning there too.
What kind of "wildfires" burn in a perfect circle, and JUMP OVER WATER, igniting all the boats?
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/what-kind-of-wildfires-burn-in-a
Don't know about the circle but it's possible the boat fires were sparked by burning embers being blown across the small stretch of water.
I read they had wind gusts up to 80 mph. Burning embers could be carried by a wind like that to the boats on the water.
I think its Directed Energy Weapons, DEW. From satellites I guess.
We are not talking aliens, that's just psyop BS.
It couldn't be China either, at least not without the complicity of the U.S. DoD.
No, I think this is proof that there is a world government apparatus already in place.
That apparatus is in control of the U.S. DoD.
This is consistent with the Covid operation being perpetrated by the U.S. DoD, at least in the U.S.
Its a depopulation agenda. They are not using DEW to directly depopulate, but to support the climate change narrative, which will be used to depopulate.
Its about control, not money. They already control the central banks.
I don't think a world government apparatus cares too much about Lahaina real estate.
Why would they use a multi-million dollar directed energy weapon in earth orbit to start wildfires when they can just get someone with a box of matches to do it? That I don't understand.
Money doesn't matter to the BIS and its minions, including the U.S. DoD, because they can just print more, so it probably comes down to their perceptions of reliability, secrecy and believability.
In terms of reliability, its probably much more reliable to start "wildfires" with DEW.
In terms of secrecy, its probably hard to depend on a group of arsonists, and it probably would have to be a group in such a wet climate. Not only would the arsonists have to be foolhardy enough to undertake it, but they would also have to be reliable, a tricky combination.
With DEW, most people wouldn't be aware of the possibility, which makes it hard to believe, and any smoking gun witnessing would probably have to be done by another agency or government with the ability to record and interpret events in space. Pictures of circles of fire taken from aircraft, and expert interpretation of the fires spread and effects can, at least for a while, be passed off as conspiracy theory if enough propaganda is applied.
Time is important because the public memory is so short, and if it goes down as "climate change" before it goes down as DEW, then they probably would call that a win.
They may have the Reichstag Fire moment they have been waiting for.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-reichstag-fire
Disturbing to think so.
I had to look at the link to the Holocaust Museum to verify the three key decrees implemented by ‘authorities’… “emergency legislation was needed to prevent…” and “For the Protection of the People and State”, “Using emergency constitutional powers,” interesting words that changed the world then and perhaps again soon.
“Emergency constitutional powers”?
You mean like lockdowns, compulsory masking, vaccine passports, vaccinations that are observed to cause more harm than good and various other restrictions for little more than a bad cold?
Did you read this account from John Leake?
https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/goodbye-lahaina?r=peo1w&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
That's really sad. Perhaps this was not a preventable disaster but a hell of a lot more could have been done to minimise the risk of it happening. One sentence stands out:
"Finally, there are documented instances on Maui in which public announcements of heightened fire risk have, paradoxically, inspired criminally disordered individuals to commit acts of arson."
This paradox (notification and warnings of high fire hazard) has been a problem for fire authorities for decades.
One semantic detail to add: When a fire is said to have been contained, it simply means a perimeter has been established and no further lateral spread is expected. While the term controlled is used to indicate all hot spots close enough to the perimeter which may cause a spot fire outside the line have been extinguished. When winds exceed 20 mph, spot fires are frequent, at 80 mph spot fires can occur great distances down wind (1/4 mile to upwards of 1 to 2 miles) as embers are lofted and carried to any available fuel downwind. These spots, and radiant heat would certainly ignite boats in the harbor.
The cause will most likely be kept elusively quiet for some time. Partly because it can be difficult to determine with certainty. But most likely because that cause will be from one of two protected classes, the ever growing homeless population, or the green nanny state subsidized energy utility.
Jaime,
Given the tragic loss of life, and also the economic costs of the fire, one might think that a top priority of the authorities would be to establish the cause of the blaze, with a view to trying to work out how to minimise the risk of it happening again.
Unfortunately the climate change narrative trumps everything.
It's pretty sick Mark. You can't control the weather or the climate, but you can certainly mitigate against sources of ignition and mitigate against uncontrolled spread.
Operation Popeye, Project Stormfury, Project Cirrus, Project Baton, HAARP.