11 Comments
User's avatar
Jo Waller's avatar

Wonks can recommend all they like. They'll be ignored just like every other reduced by a certain year (which keeps getting put back) is. It's just greenwashing procrastination. Ignore it. Politicians do.

Expand full comment
prescott's avatar

80% sounds guess-y. 81% sounds very science-y.

Expand full comment
Toffeepud's avatar

Oh and we have to give up meat and dairy.....well, I'm from a rural part of North Yorkshire and grew up in a farming community so they can sod off.

Expand full comment
pimaCanyon's avatar

When I read "CCC" my mind went, she took over the Chinese Communist Party? Oh wait, that's CCP.

CCC is just the UK's version of that! ;-)

Expand full comment
Overhead At Docksat's avatar

This is why they wrote the Climate Change Act the way they did. In Section 2 it says emissions targets can be changed if there is a change in the science. To uninformed people this seems reasonable. But what it should say is “science verified it is safe to apply to the public” rather than any old hypothetical modelling virtual reality output. Imagine trying that with new bridge design.

Expand full comment
Deborah's avatar

The net zero suicide pact for Britain just can come fast enough for satan's little helpers

Expand full comment
AYRE DAVID's avatar

These people live in Cloud cuckoo land. It has become a world of fiction and fantasy.

Expand full comment
AYRE DAVID's avatar

Sorry about the typo.

Expand full comment
Douglas Brodie's avatar

You can use the bottom-right three dot menu to edit.

Expand full comment
AYRE DAVID's avatar

Thanks, but I don't seem to have a three dot menu, or at least I haven't been able to find it yet.

I lied. I've just found it. Thanks.

Expand full comment
Ann Glover's avatar

2035 is the new 2030....

Expand full comment