Those blue buildings are houses with blue tile roofs. The red tile roofed house next door is equally untouched. The housees themselves may have suffered damage, but those roofs are protective.
Find out if any blue metal-roofed buildings did burn.
I'm getting hassled on Notes by someone who says this is just one exception to the rule and is not evidence which contradicts the theory that blue buildings/objects did not burn because a blue laser weapon was used to ignite the blazes. It only takes one inconvenient fact to demolish a beautiful theory, somebody once said.
So, anyway, in order to demonstrate that blue buildings were in fact preferentially left intact, one would need to know the ratio of blue buildings left intact to other colour buildings and one would need to know the ratio of blue buildings to other colour buildings BEFORE the fires. Until this data is forthcoming from the DEW conspiracy theorists, the so called 'exception to the rule' actually disproves the theory.
Irrespective of whether energy weapons were used, there are enough inconsistencies and oddities to be very sceptical of 'official' narrative on the land clearance of the third highest priced land in the world on remote islands being bought wholesale by tech, finance and media billionaires involved in promoting the Scamdemic.
I'm sceptical of all 'official narratives'. I'm also becoming increasingly sceptical of 'unofficial narratives'. It's time for genuine, evidence-based conspiracy theorizing, not wild speculation!
Speculation is how hypotheses are born... I am old enough to remember that 'Science' not 'Science TM' always started with a null-hypothesis and provenance with a contradiction.
I would be wary of dismissing the 'tin-hat brigade' as the last decade has been full of conspiracy theorists (a term coined by government agency) becoming conspiracy realists.
The 'evidence' usually arrives in legal terms as means, motive and (Schwabian singular) opportunity and rests on the concept of 'cui bono', i.e. beneficiary. One can add an historical context also, repeat offence etc.
To my mind, this is land clearance, same as it ever was, from the same parasites, now foundations, that saw no problem with the extinction of buffalo on the plains to drive the natives out. Lahaina is not about 'climate change'.
I don't have any problem with entertaining the idea that 'wildfires' are being set deliberately with the aim of land clearance, as I don't have any problem with speculating that 'climate crisis' fraudsters may actually be starting these 'wildfires' in order to promote their pet 'emergency'. We have had a front seat at the show of pure malice from our supposed 'leaders' these last four years. I just have a problem with the proposed means of igniting the fires and/or creating the weather conditions necessary for the fires to occur.
I really appreciate your sound logic and reasoning. As you've said, after 3 years of covid lies (and before that 4 years of Russiagate lies, Syrian gas attacks lies, WMD's in Iraq lies, 911 lies, JFK, RFK, and MLK lies, and now 1 1/2 years of Ukraine lies), it's easy to see why people don't trust MSM or the government!! But until we have evidence of DEW's or weather mod being used in Maui, we really can't jump onto that bandwagon just yet.
Those blue buildings are houses with blue tile roofs. The red tile roofed house next door is equally untouched. The housees themselves may have suffered damage, but those roofs are protective.
Find out if any blue metal-roofed buildings did burn.
This stuff is not helpful!
I'm getting hassled on Notes by someone who says this is just one exception to the rule and is not evidence which contradicts the theory that blue buildings/objects did not burn because a blue laser weapon was used to ignite the blazes. It only takes one inconvenient fact to demolish a beautiful theory, somebody once said.
So, anyway, in order to demonstrate that blue buildings were in fact preferentially left intact, one would need to know the ratio of blue buildings left intact to other colour buildings and one would need to know the ratio of blue buildings to other colour buildings BEFORE the fires. Until this data is forthcoming from the DEW conspiracy theorists, the so called 'exception to the rule' actually disproves the theory.
Irrespective of whether energy weapons were used, there are enough inconsistencies and oddities to be very sceptical of 'official' narrative on the land clearance of the third highest priced land in the world on remote islands being bought wholesale by tech, finance and media billionaires involved in promoting the Scamdemic.
Smallpox blankets are no longer de rigeur.
I'm sceptical of all 'official narratives'. I'm also becoming increasingly sceptical of 'unofficial narratives'. It's time for genuine, evidence-based conspiracy theorizing, not wild speculation!
Speculation is how hypotheses are born... I am old enough to remember that 'Science' not 'Science TM' always started with a null-hypothesis and provenance with a contradiction.
I would be wary of dismissing the 'tin-hat brigade' as the last decade has been full of conspiracy theorists (a term coined by government agency) becoming conspiracy realists.
The 'evidence' usually arrives in legal terms as means, motive and (Schwabian singular) opportunity and rests on the concept of 'cui bono', i.e. beneficiary. One can add an historical context also, repeat offence etc.
To my mind, this is land clearance, same as it ever was, from the same parasites, now foundations, that saw no problem with the extinction of buffalo on the plains to drive the natives out. Lahaina is not about 'climate change'.
IMHO.
I don't have any problem with entertaining the idea that 'wildfires' are being set deliberately with the aim of land clearance, as I don't have any problem with speculating that 'climate crisis' fraudsters may actually be starting these 'wildfires' in order to promote their pet 'emergency'. We have had a front seat at the show of pure malice from our supposed 'leaders' these last four years. I just have a problem with the proposed means of igniting the fires and/or creating the weather conditions necessary for the fires to occur.
I really appreciate your sound logic and reasoning. As you've said, after 3 years of covid lies (and before that 4 years of Russiagate lies, Syrian gas attacks lies, WMD's in Iraq lies, 911 lies, JFK, RFK, and MLK lies, and now 1 1/2 years of Ukraine lies), it's easy to see why people don't trust MSM or the government!! But until we have evidence of DEW's or weather mod being used in Maui, we really can't jump onto that bandwagon just yet.