Those blue buildings are houses with blue tile roofs. The red tile roofed house next door is equally untouched. The housees themselves may have suffered damage, but those roofs are protective.
Find out if any blue metal-roofed buildings did burn.
I'm getting hassled on Notes by someone who says this is just one exception to the rule and is not evidence which contradicts the theory that blue buildings/objects did not burn because a blue laser weapon was used to ignite the blazes. It only takes one inconvenient fact to demolish a beautiful theory, somebody once said.
So, anyway, in order to demonstrate that blue buildings were in fact preferentially left intact, one would need to know the ratio of blue buildings left intact to other colour buildings and one would need to know the ratio of blue buildings to other colour buildings BEFORE the fires. Until this data is forthcoming from the DEW conspiracy theorists, the so called 'exception to the rule' actually disproves the theory.
Those blue buildings are houses with blue tile roofs. The red tile roofed house next door is equally untouched. The housees themselves may have suffered damage, but those roofs are protective.
Find out if any blue metal-roofed buildings did burn.
This stuff is not helpful!
I'm getting hassled on Notes by someone who says this is just one exception to the rule and is not evidence which contradicts the theory that blue buildings/objects did not burn because a blue laser weapon was used to ignite the blazes. It only takes one inconvenient fact to demolish a beautiful theory, somebody once said.
So, anyway, in order to demonstrate that blue buildings were in fact preferentially left intact, one would need to know the ratio of blue buildings left intact to other colour buildings and one would need to know the ratio of blue buildings to other colour buildings BEFORE the fires. Until this data is forthcoming from the DEW conspiracy theorists, the so called 'exception to the rule' actually disproves the theory.