I've come across him before and he's the archetypal elitist and fraud. Uses his academic qualifications, his academic institution and the IPPC to try and close people down. If you are OK with it I will screenshot your graphic and ask him what the red means in the southwest. I'll link your substack article if I can but don't think Twitter allows it now.
He'll know my name. I challenged him regularly on Twitter. He started out being reasonable and approachable, willing to engage with sceptics, but he's become a fanatical warmist now.
They have a narcissistic fascination with their own creations (models) and so are impervious to data and observation. We've witnessed their continuous torturing of the data which is what narcissists and their fellow Cluster-B travellers do to inconvenient truths that stand in the way of the adulation and rewards for frothing at every weather event - such as a slow moving cell that tends to drop lots of rain as they always have done in spring and summer. Ed Hawkins also joined in the frothing but the comments to both him and Betts are not supportive.
As one put it,
"This is the daily historical rainfall data for Yeovilton, with yesterday's 35.8mm marked on it.
If anything the frequency of 35mm per day is reducing.
15 occurrences 1964-1983, but just 3 in the last 20 years.
I've come across him before and he's the archetypal elitist and fraud. Uses his academic qualifications, his academic institution and the IPPC to try and close people down. If you are OK with it I will screenshot your graphic and ask him what the red means in the southwest. I'll link your substack article if I can but don't think Twitter allows it now.
He'll know my name. I challenged him regularly on Twitter. He started out being reasonable and approachable, willing to engage with sceptics, but he's become a fanatical warmist now.
Spatial average they bamboozle with terminology science says if a 4th grader can’t understand it it’s bull shit.
How many people have seen this excellent video I wonder?
https://odysee.com/@IvorCummins:f/the-best-climate-clip-i've-ever-seen:7
They have a narcissistic fascination with their own creations (models) and so are impervious to data and observation. We've witnessed their continuous torturing of the data which is what narcissists and their fellow Cluster-B travellers do to inconvenient truths that stand in the way of the adulation and rewards for frothing at every weather event - such as a slow moving cell that tends to drop lots of rain as they always have done in spring and summer. Ed Hawkins also joined in the frothing but the comments to both him and Betts are not supportive.
As one put it,
"This is the daily historical rainfall data for Yeovilton, with yesterday's 35.8mm marked on it.
If anything the frequency of 35mm per day is reducing.
15 occurrences 1964-1983, but just 3 in the last 20 years.
Stop claiming every extreme event is Co2 driven."
https://twitter.com/EnergyBillHigh/status/1656342100546289664?t=LbIVJocpPhhsdaSVO41Cnw&s=19
Curiously, if I plug "drought climate change UK site: bbc.co.uk" into my search engine I get droughts, droughts and more droughts, year after year...
Thank you Jaime for sharing this information. It's so important that we call out the climate fraud.
I would have like to have challenged him directly, on Twitter, but of course with the continuing online censorship of dissident voices, I can't.