10 Comments

No, no, no. It was the cloud seeding that did it. (SARC)

Expand full comment
author

Unfortunately, that is the most common rebuttal I'm seeing; not that natural weather could have driven these rains, but that an alternative man-made explanation fits perfectly. We've become obsessed with our own self-importance and our own story; manic, hysterical, narcissistic, ego/anthropocentric apes that we are.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I know. Weather no longer exists unless man has in one way or another, created or caused it. Same with wild fires, earthquakes and all industrial and transportation accidents.

Expand full comment
Apr 26Liked by Jaime Jessop

Imperial College are paid to churn out this propagandist drivel, as with Neil Ferguson’s fearmongering modelling of predicted Covid deaths (500,000 in the UK).

Expand full comment

Awesome! So, now the weather works like the mafia.

They "know" Global Warming is to blame, but they just can't find it in the data. There's no evidence.

Just like a mob hit. It was written on a napkin somewhere then burned after reading.

The weather pattern destroyed the evidence of Global Warming. Weather is that skilled and illusive. 🤣😂

Who releases a scientific report that literally says, "We ain't found shit!?" I know why, because they "know" most people only read the headline. 🙄

Expand full comment
author

This is just incredible from Otto:

"“It’s not such a clear fingerprint, but we have lots of other circumstantial evidence, other lines of evidence that tell us that we see this increase,” said Imperial College of London climate scientist Friederike Otto, who coordinates the attribution study team. “It’s what we expect from physics. It’s what we expect from other studies that have been done in the area, from other studies around the world, and there’s nothing else that’s going on that could explain this increase.”

https://apnews.com/article/dubai-flooding-climate-change-cause-blame-d14743eb0e4a60c75074cb74bb44b035

What an utter clown she is.

Expand full comment

Fixed the fraudsters statement…

“It’s not such a clear fingerprint, but we have lots of other circumstantial evidence, other lines of evidence that tell us that we see this increase G vin academic fraud” said Imperial College of London climate scientist Friederike Otto, who coordinates the attribution study team. “It’s what we expect from human nature and corruption. It’s what we expect from other studies that have been done in the area, from other studies around the world, and there’s nothing else that’s going on that could explain this increase in academic fraud."

Expand full comment
Apr 25·edited Apr 25Liked by Jaime Jessop

If your model cannot be verified even with hypothetical massaged data maybe keep your mouth shut. But Imperial College apparently haven't found a nothing burger they couldn’t spin into a crisis.

Expand full comment
Apr 25Liked by Jaime Jessop

Imperial college yet again.

Expand full comment

Good lord! We don’t want Oman and Dubai getting more water. Catastrophic!!

Expand full comment