Here is Fredi Otto’s tweet talking about her latest co-authored attribution study re. the drought in the Horn of Africa: A user replied and she answered: The peer review and journal publishing system is by no means without fault but it does at least provide some reassurance of the quality of the work. WWA publishes ‘rapid response attribution analyses’ which it claims use ‘peer reviewed methods’, but none of these published analyses are peer reviewed and I suspect very few are subsequently peer reviewed and published in reputable scientific journals. So there you go. But the media insists it’s ‘the latest science’.
" However, a major, continent-wide historical climate study shows that eastern Africa experienced droughts – at least as bad as those in recent decades – throughout the 1820s and 1830s, during the 1880s and around 1900.
The 1820s-1830s drought was probably the worst of the last 200 years."
I get most of my 'climate' info here - https://wattsupwiththat.com/
Or here https://answersingenesis.org/environmental-science/
Even the UN agrees it's BS.
" However, a major, continent-wide historical climate study shows that eastern Africa experienced droughts – at least as bad as those in recent decades – throughout the 1820s and 1830s, during the 1880s and around 1900.
The 1820s-1830s drought was probably the worst of the last 200 years."
https://climatechampions.unfccc.int/is-eastern-africas-drought-the-worst-in-recent-history-and-are-worse-yet-to-come/#:~:text=However%2C%20a%20major%2C%20continent%2D,of%20the%20last%20200%20years.
Thanks for that link. Interesting.
Whatever journal you’re looking at medical scientific etc they are all shills- being published means nought
@WWAtttibutionBS
"That's the point of @WWattribution" says it all. It is of course just more "climate emergency" hooey.