So 'Global Warming' dramatically increased over these 3 years did it? - massively up from its 1 degC per century! 0.01 degC on average per year!!! - Ludicrous concept! Thanks for posting Jaime.
So the paper melted as fast as the snow we had just over a week ago (on contact with the surface), yet the headline has gone out into the ether to fuel the acolytes and sheeple. Job done. More factoid faeces for the intellectually facile to flush through their turgid lobotomised brains as they droll uncontrollably as they slowly club themselves to death.
I just fucking despair at this utter shit show, despite my many years in the climate trenches.
Along with the NYT the WaPo is the US equivalent of the Guardian, home to the arch-AGW evangelist George Moonbat who wants to stop all farming, and not fit to line a cat litter tray.
Mar 17, 2023·edited Mar 17, 2023Liked by Jaime Jessop
My fitst thought was how did this get past peer review. I noticed one of the issues immediately with just a quick scan of the graph.
Dr Kimberley Reid was too polite with her criticism, “Those two issues should have been picked up on during peer review, but the processes designed to maintain scientific rigour are not infallible, unfortunately."
So 'Global Warming' dramatically increased over these 3 years did it? - massively up from its 1 degC per century! 0.01 degC on average per year!!! - Ludicrous concept! Thanks for posting Jaime.
So the paper melted as fast as the snow we had just over a week ago (on contact with the surface), yet the headline has gone out into the ether to fuel the acolytes and sheeple. Job done. More factoid faeces for the intellectually facile to flush through their turgid lobotomised brains as they droll uncontrollably as they slowly club themselves to death.
I just fucking despair at this utter shit show, despite my many years in the climate trenches.
Along with the NYT the WaPo is the US equivalent of the Guardian, home to the arch-AGW evangelist George Moonbat who wants to stop all farming, and not fit to line a cat litter tray.
The rag of the liberal tools and climate cultists (sorry to be redundant) interviews one if their own. Tool to tool.
My fitst thought was how did this get past peer review. I noticed one of the issues immediately with just a quick scan of the graph.
Dr Kimberley Reid was too polite with her criticism, “Those two issues should have been picked up on during peer review, but the processes designed to maintain scientific rigour are not infallible, unfortunately."
Not that long ago, Aztec "Climate Priests" demanded the heart cut out of your youngest child atop a stone pyramid in the jungle so that it would rain.
And they were absolutely correct in their methods too. Turns out if they murdered enough children that it DID eventually rain.
Same $cience.
I read the Washington Post once. But I didn't inhale.
I cannot stand the stupidity anymore......
I hope all the climate scientists that utter this crap fall into a crevass.