13 Comments
User's avatar
Jeremy Poynton's avatar

Moronic thing to say by Starmer. All the more so to Trump, who will have sussed Starmer to 1. Weird & 2. Robotic.

The two couldn't be diiferent, one fully embracing his being, the other having no being. That he is personality disordered I have no doubt, and it's jacked up by power.

Never been scared by a politician. Starmer terrifies me. MacMillan the first PM I recall.

Expand full comment
c Anderson's avatar

A great take on Starmer and why Trump and AG Pam Bondi released the binders with Epstein evidence right before the meeting is that it was a signal to Starmer that the US has the goods on Prince Andrew and his Epstein relationship. 😉 Trump has Starmer under his thumb. Keep up the great work Jaime!

Expand full comment
Leaf and Stream's avatar

The most interesting (I know, oxymoron) thing about what Starmer said in an unguarded moment was that the UK would have free speech " for a very, very long time." Implying that he can certainly see a time or circumstances when, regretfully, due to possible harms , it would have to be suspended indefinitely. You know, to keep people safe.

Expand full comment
c Anderson's avatar

🤯

Expand full comment
Douglas Brodie's avatar

I found it strange that Trump was so “nice” to Starmer during the White House visit. Jeff Childers’ latest newsletter gives devastating insights on Trump’s possible ulterior motives: https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/non-disclosure-friday-february-28.

Expand full comment
LaMaisonGelat's avatar

This goes above Keith to his puppeteers, essentially those globalists that attacked Team Trump and team red via 'Russiagate' (UK involvement), the scamdemic and then via ongoing lawfare and unfettered immigration into the US during the Biden admins reign... To think Keith would then go and bang on about the 'special relationship' (there isn't one) is only indicative of how useless a non-entity he is... And the Eurotrash WEF backed parasites.

Expand full comment
prescott's avatar

Like all weak-willed politicians, Starmer and others honestly think they support free speech. They just define free speech as that which doesn't bother them. I do think they go to sleep every night with the delusion that they are the good guys.

Expand full comment
c Anderson's avatar

Don’t delude yourself. That’s what many Americans thought about Obama, George Bush et al. They are clever, cunning, and narcissistic and they know better than the common folk. Just ask them.

Expand full comment
AYRE DAVID's avatar

You can always tell when a politician is lying - his lips move.

Expand full comment
Douglas Brodie's avatar

Blatant lying is the default option for the likes of Two-Tier Keir – his own Labour MP gets let off for a vicious physical assault while members of the public who tweet supposedly hurty words get banged up for two years.

How can he possibly deny the nefarious free speech-denying ulterior motives behind the Online Safety Act and the fact that he and the EU are actively trying to get X shut down? That latter point was very much what Vance was objecting to.

At least he got put in his place on Ukraine, with Trump saying that joining NATO was never going to happen and that the push for this, which he has now cancelled, was the main cause of the war. It looks as if a so-called peace-keeping force is never going to happen either.

Expand full comment
Alan Richards's avatar

I thought the ultimate gaslight was Starmer praising Trump for bringing back the bust of Churchill, when he’s done the exact opposite in No. 10. I hope Trump picks him up on it on his return trip.

Expand full comment
Gary Sharpe's avatar

Aren't you afraid of being arrested for critizing Starmer online? Folks are being jailed for less!!!

Expand full comment
Jaime Jessop's avatar

It's not how I would choose to prove my point, but I'm not going to let fear of tin pot tyrants get in the way of my online fact-mongering.

Expand full comment