Busted. The UK government has been caught red-handed quietly changing its advice on the use of the Pfizer-Biontech Covid-19 vaccine in pregnant women. This is what they were saying in August 2021: The supposed US ‘safety’ information came from a CDC study using the V-safe pregnancy register, which was heavily criticised at the time and has been numerous times since. I covered it
Just to make things clear, the v safe pregnancy register study, which the UK government cited as 'evidence' for the safety of the vaccines in pregnant women, was a statistical fraud; I wager a deliberate statistical fraud. They intentionally misled women in order to coerce them into getting injected with what they KNEW was a dangerous product.
"When calculated correctly, removing 700 subjects that were not relevant for the spontaneous abortion denominator (but were included by the NEJM study authors to hide the horrendous result), the rate is a staggering 82%. Comparing to the 10% “normal” rate, this is an 8x increase! Furthermore, in the 700 group of 3rd trimester pregnancies, the rate of stillbirth is ~1.5%, while a quick search of CDC data shows that the historical norm is around only 0.6%. The injected women experienced about 3x increased rate."
The stillbirth rate is 2.5x, but it's still very bad and the spontaneous abortion rate is catastrophic. For the UK government to actually use this data, fraudulently manipulated, as justification to advise pregnant women to get 'vaccinated' - and STILL be using it a year later - is a monstrous CRIME. Hancock and Johnson should be in jail.
The BBC is claiming now that the document is from 2020 and reflected advice given to pregnant women at that time, alleging that the claims that government has changed its advice are false, ergo 'misinformation/disinformation'. Well, excuse me, but if the government updates pages on a web page, then it bears the responsibility of ensuring ALL information on that page is up to date. The page in question has been updated at least twice, the last time on 16th August. If they can't be bothered to alter the text on such an important issue, then they should expect the public to point out the glaring discrepancy. This being the case, the government itself is the purveyor of misinformation. More importantly, even if the government recommends the vaccine for pregnant women still, it does so on the basis of a very iffy US study and is ignoring reports of many harms thereafter.
Thank you for fighting for the victims of this thing.
https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/uk-lab-report
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UlMrYOYEgJRp/
https://vaccinesandmicroscopes.wordpress.com/
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/pfizer-injected-blood-under-the-microscope:6
Just to make things clear, the v safe pregnancy register study, which the UK government cited as 'evidence' for the safety of the vaccines in pregnant women, was a statistical fraud; I wager a deliberate statistical fraud. They intentionally misled women in order to coerce them into getting injected with what they KNEW was a dangerous product.
"When calculated correctly, removing 700 subjects that were not relevant for the spontaneous abortion denominator (but were included by the NEJM study authors to hide the horrendous result), the rate is a staggering 82%. Comparing to the 10% “normal” rate, this is an 8x increase! Furthermore, in the 700 group of 3rd trimester pregnancies, the rate of stillbirth is ~1.5%, while a quick search of CDC data shows that the historical norm is around only 0.6%. The injected women experienced about 3x increased rate."
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/covid-19-injections-in-pregnant-women-lead-to-8x-increase-in-spontaneous-abortions-and-3x-increase-in-stillbirths.-a48c57af
The stillbirth rate is 2.5x, but it's still very bad and the spontaneous abortion rate is catastrophic. For the UK government to actually use this data, fraudulently manipulated, as justification to advise pregnant women to get 'vaccinated' - and STILL be using it a year later - is a monstrous CRIME. Hancock and Johnson should be in jail.
The BBC is claiming now that the document is from 2020 and reflected advice given to pregnant women at that time, alleging that the claims that government has changed its advice are false, ergo 'misinformation/disinformation'. Well, excuse me, but if the government updates pages on a web page, then it bears the responsibility of ensuring ALL information on that page is up to date. The page in question has been updated at least twice, the last time on 16th August. If they can't be bothered to alter the text on such an important issue, then they should expect the public to point out the glaring discrepancy. This being the case, the government itself is the purveyor of misinformation. More importantly, even if the government recommends the vaccine for pregnant women still, it does so on the basis of a very iffy US study and is ignoring reports of many harms thereafter.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-62739554