There is a statue in Carlisle dedicated to Queen Victoria, celebrating her long reign and the considerable achievements of Great Britain during her reign, categorised under Science and Art, Education, Commerce and the expansion of Empire. But the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of the third decade of the 21st Century, has turned its back on Science and Art, and has rendered Education little more than an exercise in political and social indoctrination. Commerce consists largely of exporting financial services and importing virtually everything else. This is because we are decimating our industries by pointless and unscientific Net Zero policies put in place to address a non existent climate crisis which we hoped the rest of the world would see as a ‘good example’ - the rest of the world hasn’t. Empire no longer exists except in the rabid ambitions of aficionados of the British Deep State allied in its objectives with that of the globalist elites.
"neo-Marxist, neo-Malthusian, fascist apologist eco catastrophists embedded in our institutions" - couldn't have put it better myself. Although I'd probably add more colourful language. No wait... that's racist!! Um... white language?
It's not just Great Britain but almost the entire Western world imploding at once under the same Evil force employing the same fifth generation warfare....
Lessons from history,as madness seems to be cyclical: Stalin stubbornly refused to heed the mass of information, transmitted at enormous personal risk, by the Red Orchestra in Germany and the Sorge network in Japan, that Hitler would invade the USSR, dismissing the messages as disinformation.
As we know, Operation Barbarossa commenced on June 22nd 1941, as the agents had warned.
Fast forward to 2003: weapons inspectors found no evidence of WMD in Iraq, yet the dodgy dossier was employed to justify the disastrous invasion,sanctioned by Bush and Blair.
Now we have Nut Zero, Open Borders, following the ruinously destructive Covid lockdowns.
Will humanity's leaders never learn? Will they keep repeating these blunders ,seduced by their own hubris, righteousness and delusional thinking?
I’ve been angry for decades about how proper science has been usurped by pseudo-science on the climate change fraud. At least the damage it has caused to date has been mostly just economic. My anger increased when the establishment used the same trick on the much worse Covid “plandemic” which has maimed, sterilised and killed tens of millions worldwide.
I’ve tried my best to warn my brainwashed acquaintances and family of how badly they are being abused but they mostly don’t want to know. Too bad. At least my anger is abating in my “retirement” and I can now laugh at the establishment’s pathetic attempts to construct a Net Zero silk purse out of a sow’s ear. I told our politicians years ago that Net Zero was infeasible. I’ve also just cancelled the Covid and flu ‘vaccination’ appointment the NHS set up for me.
I'd forgotten that John Campbell lived in Carlisle, so yes, at least he is upholding the principles which once made this nation Great. It wouldn't surprise me if he visits the Victoria monument quite regularly and laments the passing of an era.
The German government locked up Thomas Binder at the start of the plandemic, after labelling him as mentally unstable! That's how desperate they were to censor dissent.
I find it hard to believe nsatube police haven't blocked John completely. Watching John's slow 180 degree change after accepting the redpill was nothing short of extraordinary.
He has to be controlled opposition, releasing information slowly to turn round the oil tanker of public opinion about vaccines and big pharma so that it doesn't have a seizure.
That is why they are attacking free speech. Covid has pulled back the curtain and we are all seeing they are murdering psychopaths. The great freeset has begun...
The (Second) Boer War was very much a nationalist war. On one side was Salisbury, concerned with securing British command of the Cape route to the Far East, thereby increasing the security of our Eastern possessions (India, Australia, NZ, etc.); he also wished to restore British prestige following Gladstone’s pusillanimity after the First Boer War, and exact revenge for Majuba Hill. Another concern was obtaining better treatment of the ‘Uitlanders’, the mostly British non-Dutch residents whose labour and wealth the Transvaal Boers were growing fat on while treating them shabbily in return. (As illustration of their travails, a Briton, Tom Edgar, following a drunken fracas with locals, was shot dead in his home by a ‘Zarp’ (Boer policeman), later acquitted of murder by a Boer jury with approval by the presiding Boer judge). Of lesser but still existing concern was equitable treatment for the natives (while the British generally regarded blacks as inferior, it was as children in need of guidance and development—Kipling’s ‘white man’s burden’—as opposed to the inflexible and altogether nastier attitude of the Boers, e.g. ‘[S]everity was essential. The black man had to be taught that he came second, that he belonged to the inferior class which must obey and learn.’ ‘The Memoirs of Paul Kruger: Four Times President of the South African Republic. Told by Himself.’ Morang, 1902. 41 [footnote]).
On the other was Paul Kruger, a Boer supremacist who believed the Boers God’s chosen people (Britons also had an elevated view of themselves, and Rhodes believed the world would benefit from being dominated by the Anglo-Saxon race; but it was an amiable superiority complex—for all our talk of God being an Englishman, anyone who came to these isles was legally and politically equal to everyone else, and to a fair extent, this applied throughout our Empire). A Boer Osama Bin-Laden, Kruger was a Calvinist (Dutch Reformed Church) zealot who proudly declared that he had never read any other book than the Bible, which he took literally and believed the Earth to be flat—and like Osama hubristically believing he could take on and defeat the United States, so Kruger hubristically believed he could take on and defeat the British Empire.
Unlike the patriotic Rhodes, Milner, Joseph Chamberlain, et al, Kruger was not promoting his mother country’s interests but his own and his cronies’. ‘The Transvaal “Republic” is administered in the interests of a conservative clique of about three dozen families. “He heaps up pensions and preferments on his relatives in a way that would put Tammany Hall to shame,” writes Mr. T. A. McKenzie in his recently published pamphlet on President Kruger.’ (Hutten, T.C. (1900). The Doom of the Boer Oligarchies. A Netherlander’s View of the South African Problem. ‘The North American Review’, 170(520), 327–331. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25104961)
If the Transvaal had been a Dutch possession and Kruger simply a local governor we would have had a different attitude as we preferred genial relations with *real* countries. Thus no disputes with Portuguese Mozambique or Angola—if issues arose London discussed them with Lisbon (hence agreement for British undercover operations to interdict the supply of arms to Boers via Mozambique). Cabals of religious nutters carving out fiefdoms for themselves on land they’ve no more title to than anyone else is another matter. Nonetheless, we enjoyed amicable relations with the other Boer republic, the Orange Free State, esp. under its president (1864–88) Johannes Brand, our relationship only deteriorating with his Boer supremacist successors, F.W. Reitz and Martinus Steyn.
The South African Wars were over who would dominate South Africa, whether it would be ruled for the benefit of the British or Kruger (who was happy to invade his fellow Boers in the OFS in 1857 in furtherance of his expansionist aims, and people rattle on about the Jameson Raid yet no-one complains of Kruger running guns to the Cape Colony Boers). Insofar as Britain expanded in southern Africa prior to 1899, it was mainly only after the repeated entreaties of various tribal kingdoms desperate for protection from Boer rapine.
We threw our weight about but that’s how international diplomacy works—like a poker game: you fold, you bluff, you call, you raise, and hope your play is right; sometimes it is and you collect your winnings, sometimes it isn’t and you pay your losses. What isn’t supposed to happen is a player throwing his cards away and leaping across the table to try and strangle you; which is what Kruger did when he declared war on Britain and invaded our South African colonies.
‘[G]lobalists’ do not enter into it. While the conflict involved contributions from our various colonies, at that point in history, most colonials regarded themselves as British, being either actually British or of recent British stock; fighting was limited to southern Africa, becoming no more international than those British intelligence operations in Mozambique, along with numbers of foreign volunteers aiding the Boer side. The only ‘global’ aspect to the Second South African War was the number of nations condemning us (foreshadowing of Israel, where victim is portrayed as victimiser)—and it is interesting in light of the later alignment of nations in the First World War which nations were discussing military intervention on the Boer side (Russia and France, Tsar Nicholas being esp. keen), and which were most sympathetic to us (Germany—Kaiser at least, his people being of different mind with many cities seeing anti-British/pro-Boer protests).
As for the First World War being caused by ‘globalists’—examining the motives of the main powers involved and ignoring hindsight makes it hard to fault the various actors. Austria-Hungary can hardly attract blame for seizing an opportunity to end Serbian mischief-making; Germany, unhappy with enemies to West and East, was esp. concerned about Russia’s growing industrialisation; France and Russia were unhappy with the aggressively wielded and rising power of their neighbour, Prussia-dominated Germany; Britain was concerned about Germany’s High Seas fleet threatening our maritime dominance and our nation’s primary defence, not helped by Germany’s rebuffs at our attempts to agree treaties with them.
The First World War is far more comprehensible both in its start and later stalemating than the Second World War which has to be the most telegraphed war in history, with opportunity after opportunity to stamp on Jerry while they were weak squandered, from Ramsey MacDonald through Baldwin to Neville, along with France’s Gaston Doumergue and Albert Lebrun and their various Présidents du Conseil—people prattle about the failure of Versailles but the real failure of Versailles was the treaty not being enforced (although MacDonald simply refusing to withdraw the British Army of the Rhine in 1929 would likely have been enough to keep Adolf in his box, along with the other revanchist elements the BAOR were monitoring). And the so rapid defeat of the quantitatively and qualitatively (in terms of matériel) superior Anglo-French forces at the hands of the nearly WW1-tier Heer in 1940 is little short of astounding.
Recommended reading: ‘Kruger’s War: The Truth Behind the Myths of the Boer War’ (2017) by Chris Ash; updated and expanded edition of ‘Kruger, Kommandos, and Kak: Debunking the Myths of the Boer War’ (2014)
However, I've now seen and read about some of the lies we have all been fed about WW2 and some of the inconvenient truths that have been intentionally hidden from us.
The USS Liberty was an eye opener as well as the alleged reveals about Pearl Harbour and the orchestrated US entry into the war.
I am still not anti Jewish, but can see that there are wealthy tyrants exerting influence to our detriment.
I keep seeing the terms "Khazarian mafia and Black nobility" to give a name to these people.
Not directly linked, but the first diagram on this page is also interesting.
"neo-Marxist, neo-Malthusian, fascist apologist eco catastrophists embedded in our institutions" - couldn't have put it better myself. Although I'd probably add more colourful language. No wait... that's racist!! Um... white language?
I've got it! Language of colour.
It's not just Great Britain but almost the entire Western world imploding at once under the same Evil force employing the same fifth generation warfare....
Lessons from history,as madness seems to be cyclical: Stalin stubbornly refused to heed the mass of information, transmitted at enormous personal risk, by the Red Orchestra in Germany and the Sorge network in Japan, that Hitler would invade the USSR, dismissing the messages as disinformation.
As we know, Operation Barbarossa commenced on June 22nd 1941, as the agents had warned.
Fast forward to 2003: weapons inspectors found no evidence of WMD in Iraq, yet the dodgy dossier was employed to justify the disastrous invasion,sanctioned by Bush and Blair.
Now we have Nut Zero, Open Borders, following the ruinously destructive Covid lockdowns.
Will humanity's leaders never learn? Will they keep repeating these blunders ,seduced by their own hubris, righteousness and delusional thinking?
Can you imagine George Michael's 'Shoot the Dog' on current affairs? Surprised EwTube haven't taken this down.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABhZQ_VRbsQ
At least @johnincarlisle (Dr John Campbell) is bucking the trend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6xBiyidQ9g.
I’ve been angry for decades about how proper science has been usurped by pseudo-science on the climate change fraud. At least the damage it has caused to date has been mostly just economic. My anger increased when the establishment used the same trick on the much worse Covid “plandemic” which has maimed, sterilised and killed tens of millions worldwide.
I’ve tried my best to warn my brainwashed acquaintances and family of how badly they are being abused but they mostly don’t want to know. Too bad. At least my anger is abating in my “retirement” and I can now laugh at the establishment’s pathetic attempts to construct a Net Zero silk purse out of a sow’s ear. I told our politicians years ago that Net Zero was infeasible. I’ve also just cancelled the Covid and flu ‘vaccination’ appointment the NHS set up for me.
I’ve belatedly come across Dr Thomas Binder who has put out a brilliant 7-minute video excoriating the Covid plandemic (his word): https://twitter.com/Thomas_Binder/status/1706278043646410928?s=20.
Don't mention the NHS, Nauseatingly Hopeless Organisation.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/nhs-covid-19-vaccine-advice
I'd forgotten that John Campbell lived in Carlisle, so yes, at least he is upholding the principles which once made this nation Great. It wouldn't surprise me if he visits the Victoria monument quite regularly and laments the passing of an era.
The German government locked up Thomas Binder at the start of the plandemic, after labelling him as mentally unstable! That's how desperate they were to censor dissent.
I find it hard to believe nsatube police haven't blocked John completely. Watching John's slow 180 degree change after accepting the redpill was nothing short of extraordinary.
He has to be controlled opposition, releasing information slowly to turn round the oil tanker of public opinion about vaccines and big pharma so that it doesn't have a seizure.
Mixing my metaphors there!
Broken Woken Britain; destroyed from within by entryism, magical thinking, dogma and cultish agitprop.
Part and parcel of the decay and corruption of the west.
The UK government are now murderers killing for profit on the orders of the CIA globalist terrorist organisation.
Given my recent exposure to the existence of "untold history", I wonder if it is the City of London that pulls everyone's strings.
All roads lead to Rome because as I have said elsewhere, vaccination is an anagram of 'icon Vatican'. There is even a 'coin Vatican'.
https://www.cfn.va/en/home/2631-20-05-2022-euro-coin-set-proof-version-year-2022.html
Unbelievable that they would produce such coins in the first place.
CIA, MI6, Freemasons, WEF, WHO, it doesn't really matter any more, they are all the same.
Agreed, though I think the powerful and rich puppet masters, operate behind the curtain and have done for at least 100 years.
That is why they are attacking free speech. Covid has pulled back the curtain and we are all seeing they are murdering psychopaths. The great freeset has begun...
And probably far longer...
At least as far back as Cecil Rhodes and the Boer War, which was the warm up exercise for the globalists' first international profit-making World War.
The (Second) Boer War was very much a nationalist war. On one side was Salisbury, concerned with securing British command of the Cape route to the Far East, thereby increasing the security of our Eastern possessions (India, Australia, NZ, etc.); he also wished to restore British prestige following Gladstone’s pusillanimity after the First Boer War, and exact revenge for Majuba Hill. Another concern was obtaining better treatment of the ‘Uitlanders’, the mostly British non-Dutch residents whose labour and wealth the Transvaal Boers were growing fat on while treating them shabbily in return. (As illustration of their travails, a Briton, Tom Edgar, following a drunken fracas with locals, was shot dead in his home by a ‘Zarp’ (Boer policeman), later acquitted of murder by a Boer jury with approval by the presiding Boer judge). Of lesser but still existing concern was equitable treatment for the natives (while the British generally regarded blacks as inferior, it was as children in need of guidance and development—Kipling’s ‘white man’s burden’—as opposed to the inflexible and altogether nastier attitude of the Boers, e.g. ‘[S]everity was essential. The black man had to be taught that he came second, that he belonged to the inferior class which must obey and learn.’ ‘The Memoirs of Paul Kruger: Four Times President of the South African Republic. Told by Himself.’ Morang, 1902. 41 [footnote]).
On the other was Paul Kruger, a Boer supremacist who believed the Boers God’s chosen people (Britons also had an elevated view of themselves, and Rhodes believed the world would benefit from being dominated by the Anglo-Saxon race; but it was an amiable superiority complex—for all our talk of God being an Englishman, anyone who came to these isles was legally and politically equal to everyone else, and to a fair extent, this applied throughout our Empire). A Boer Osama Bin-Laden, Kruger was a Calvinist (Dutch Reformed Church) zealot who proudly declared that he had never read any other book than the Bible, which he took literally and believed the Earth to be flat—and like Osama hubristically believing he could take on and defeat the United States, so Kruger hubristically believed he could take on and defeat the British Empire.
Unlike the patriotic Rhodes, Milner, Joseph Chamberlain, et al, Kruger was not promoting his mother country’s interests but his own and his cronies’. ‘The Transvaal “Republic” is administered in the interests of a conservative clique of about three dozen families. “He heaps up pensions and preferments on his relatives in a way that would put Tammany Hall to shame,” writes Mr. T. A. McKenzie in his recently published pamphlet on President Kruger.’ (Hutten, T.C. (1900). The Doom of the Boer Oligarchies. A Netherlander’s View of the South African Problem. ‘The North American Review’, 170(520), 327–331. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25104961)
If the Transvaal had been a Dutch possession and Kruger simply a local governor we would have had a different attitude as we preferred genial relations with *real* countries. Thus no disputes with Portuguese Mozambique or Angola—if issues arose London discussed them with Lisbon (hence agreement for British undercover operations to interdict the supply of arms to Boers via Mozambique). Cabals of religious nutters carving out fiefdoms for themselves on land they’ve no more title to than anyone else is another matter. Nonetheless, we enjoyed amicable relations with the other Boer republic, the Orange Free State, esp. under its president (1864–88) Johannes Brand, our relationship only deteriorating with his Boer supremacist successors, F.W. Reitz and Martinus Steyn.
The South African Wars were over who would dominate South Africa, whether it would be ruled for the benefit of the British or Kruger (who was happy to invade his fellow Boers in the OFS in 1857 in furtherance of his expansionist aims, and people rattle on about the Jameson Raid yet no-one complains of Kruger running guns to the Cape Colony Boers). Insofar as Britain expanded in southern Africa prior to 1899, it was mainly only after the repeated entreaties of various tribal kingdoms desperate for protection from Boer rapine.
We threw our weight about but that’s how international diplomacy works—like a poker game: you fold, you bluff, you call, you raise, and hope your play is right; sometimes it is and you collect your winnings, sometimes it isn’t and you pay your losses. What isn’t supposed to happen is a player throwing his cards away and leaping across the table to try and strangle you; which is what Kruger did when he declared war on Britain and invaded our South African colonies.
‘[G]lobalists’ do not enter into it. While the conflict involved contributions from our various colonies, at that point in history, most colonials regarded themselves as British, being either actually British or of recent British stock; fighting was limited to southern Africa, becoming no more international than those British intelligence operations in Mozambique, along with numbers of foreign volunteers aiding the Boer side. The only ‘global’ aspect to the Second South African War was the number of nations condemning us (foreshadowing of Israel, where victim is portrayed as victimiser)—and it is interesting in light of the later alignment of nations in the First World War which nations were discussing military intervention on the Boer side (Russia and France, Tsar Nicholas being esp. keen), and which were most sympathetic to us (Germany—Kaiser at least, his people being of different mind with many cities seeing anti-British/pro-Boer protests).
As for the First World War being caused by ‘globalists’—examining the motives of the main powers involved and ignoring hindsight makes it hard to fault the various actors. Austria-Hungary can hardly attract blame for seizing an opportunity to end Serbian mischief-making; Germany, unhappy with enemies to West and East, was esp. concerned about Russia’s growing industrialisation; France and Russia were unhappy with the aggressively wielded and rising power of their neighbour, Prussia-dominated Germany; Britain was concerned about Germany’s High Seas fleet threatening our maritime dominance and our nation’s primary defence, not helped by Germany’s rebuffs at our attempts to agree treaties with them.
The First World War is far more comprehensible both in its start and later stalemating than the Second World War which has to be the most telegraphed war in history, with opportunity after opportunity to stamp on Jerry while they were weak squandered, from Ramsey MacDonald through Baldwin to Neville, along with France’s Gaston Doumergue and Albert Lebrun and their various Présidents du Conseil—people prattle about the failure of Versailles but the real failure of Versailles was the treaty not being enforced (although MacDonald simply refusing to withdraw the British Army of the Rhine in 1929 would likely have been enough to keep Adolf in his box, along with the other revanchist elements the BAOR were monitoring). And the so rapid defeat of the quantitatively and qualitatively (in terms of matériel) superior Anglo-French forces at the hands of the nearly WW1-tier Heer in 1940 is little short of astounding.
Recommended reading: ‘Kruger’s War: The Truth Behind the Myths of the Boer War’ (2017) by Chris Ash; updated and expanded edition of ‘Kruger, Kommandos, and Kak: Debunking the Myths of the Boer War’ (2014)
I was never on board with anti Jewish attitudes.
However, I've now seen and read about some of the lies we have all been fed about WW2 and some of the inconvenient truths that have been intentionally hidden from us.
The USS Liberty was an eye opener as well as the alleged reveals about Pearl Harbour and the orchestrated US entry into the war.
I am still not anti Jewish, but can see that there are wealthy tyrants exerting influence to our detriment.
I keep seeing the terms "Khazarian mafia and Black nobility" to give a name to these people.
Not directly linked, but the first diagram on this page is also interesting.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439997/