13 Comments
author

I am reminded that the Guardian has got previous form in promoting the removal of its ideological opponents. Toby Rogers points out that they advocated 'reining in' Tanzania's antivaxxer Covid-denying President - and a month later he was dead and the paper rejoiced:

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/the-spectacle-of-covid

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/feb/08/its-time-for-africa-to-rein-in-tanzanias-anti-vaxxer-president

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/17/tanzanias-president-john-magufuli-dies-aged-61

Of course, I'm not suggesting that the Graun hired a hit man to dispose of Magufuli, but the coincidence is 'odd' and their obvious delight at his passing is very unseemly.

Expand full comment
Jul 18, 2023Liked by Jaime Jessop

"Michael Mann was scathing and personal in his comments"

Ah, good old Hokey Schtick Mann, who can even get a hockey stick when the data says exactly the opposite!

https://climateaudit.org/2009/09/03/kaufmann-and-upside-down-mann/

Expand full comment
Jul 18, 2023Liked by Jaime Jessop

The blatant corruption in climate science was obvious to me years ago. Dealing with a loved one’s cancer exposed me to the same level of corruption in the medical field, but I naively thought it was confined to oncology. Covid opened my eyes to the reality that the entire field of medicine is as bastardized and corrupt as Climate Science. We need to establish replacement publications and associations that are not financed by governments and Pharma.

Expand full comment

Anyone remember this from the University of East Anglia? This is where the hoax was first exposed. The university of East Anglia is where the "hockey stick graph" came from.

There is no "Climate Science" because the raw data is always hidden. Kind of like what they were trying to do with the Pfizer clinical trial data. "We're telling the truth, but you can't see our 'proof' because... well just because."

"Oh, and if you want proof, uhh, you're racist! Because Climate Change effects the poor and minorities the most! We stopped saying Climate change hurts 'minorities, women, and the poor' -- because chicks can be dudes now..."

Carnival barkers are *not* scientists, anymore than Dr. Pepper is a doctor.

If the planet was really being destroyed, why would you have to list the people "most effected" by it? Wouldn't that really be *everyone*?

Give me a break!

http://winduprubberfinger.com/blog1.php/2009/12/10/top-scientists-try-to-use-consensus-agai

Expand full comment

The usual suspects in the Climate Mafia™️ once again having a paper retracted because it goes against their narrative. Colour me surprised. If it's a narrative, as they spent much of the 2010's telling us needed to be communicated better, then it's not science. Can't be having the ponzi scheme underminded.

Expand full comment

Well done for highlighting this, Jaime.

Expand full comment
author

P.S.

RIP Dr David Kelly, a scientist who died 20 years ago today because he exposed the lies of Prime Minister Tony Blair's government.

Expand full comment

Murdered

Expand full comment