The issue for me is the manmade chemicals being sprayed. As with everything synthetic, there will be downstream effects. Have these chemicals been subjected to scientific safety studies? Their effect on Asthma, COPD etc. Are they safe for children and the environment, what happens when incorporated into precipitation? I suspect none of these studies have been done.
Let's poison the air for the sake of the Net Zero folly. NO, NO, NO.
There’s a good chance that RFK Jr as Health Secretary and Lee Zeldin as head of the Environmental Protection Agency will set an example in the USA which the rest of the world will be obliged to follow.
And just to add to the insanity propoganda, the headline of a major British MSM newspaper today, was to warn us of the terrifying possibility we'll be hit by temperatures around 25°C / 77°F in the next few days! You just couldn't make it up 🤣
I’m happy to let the geoengineering hysteria flourish because it helps to rubbish the Net Zero agenda as the prospect of actually dimming sunlight by human endeavour is quite scary. Most people know that alleged man-made global warming is a nonsense and that trying to prevent it is a nonsense.
My cynical take on the motivation for such geoengineering, which simple physics dictates will have minimal and no lasting effect on the global climate is that when natural global cooling kicks in, as could happen within a few years (AMO, GSM), the corrupt establishment will be able to say “See, it worked, our geoengineering saved us from global boiling but that was only a temporary respite and we need to press ahead with the Net Zero decarbonisation agenda”.
The graph you show of UK sunshine hours vs surface temperature shows a 0.82 correlation coefficient. So is that the cause of the global warming observed in the last century, bearing in mind correlation doesn't prove causation? And is the increase in sunshine years due to less cloud cover? But I thought a warmer earth surface would increase evaporation from the oceans, which make up most of the earth's surface, and therefore likely increase cloud cover (or is that only low altitude clouds?). And where does back radiation caused by greenhouse gases including CO2 (the greenhouse effect) fit into this? Forgive me for feeling a little confused....
There is a useful graph in this 2014 Clive Best post showing cloud cover versus temperature from 1983 to 2008: https://clivebest.com/blog/?p=5694
It could be that the warming of the 1980-90s relates to the warming phase of the 70-year AMO cycle, followed by the flatlining plateau of its warm phase, to be followed by … guess what, a repeat of the 1960-70s new ice age scare? Schedule rudely interrupted by Hunga Tonga!
The Earth's oceans and atmosphere are an incredibly complex system, but my guess is that the response of that complex system to any perturbation will always be self-limiting such that an equilibrium state is maintained in the ling term. This does not mean that equilibrium prevails over shorter periods (e.g. decades). Hence, I imagine the response to increased solar radiation will be an increase in surface temperature initially, but then negative feedbacks will kick in (e.g. increasing cloud cover due to increased evaporation from sea surfaces) and thus limit the increase in temperature. In the real world, runaway global warming is extremely unlikely.
Exactly. The scare stories about tipping points and runaway global warming are unscientific BS. If nature didn’t abhor positive feedbacks the planet would have self-destructed long ago. The huge volume of water in the earth’s oceans keeps the climate stable though all manner of perturbations.
Thanks Jaime. We know from ConVid that governments are now expert at directing the narrative to suit their objective. They must employ thousands to gameplay every option and tactic to achieve their ends. Second guessing their strategy is a risky business and divides even those on the same side. We know they want to achieve total control over the world’s assets and the lives of the populace. The Climate Alarmism is the perfect tool. But deflection, using all manner psychological pressures and manipulation, confuses the issue and causes dissent even amongst those who know the endgame. This should be very evident to all after ConVid.
Global dimwitting, I like that. It's the usual suspects. I don't trust Neil Oliver, he was very happy with lockdown and posted lovely pics online of dog walks in Stirling. John Campbell has finally been red pilled but this is hardly his area of expertise. I think the covid jabs did more damage than we realise.....it was the best decision I ever made not to have the bloody things, and I don't trust govt or the medical establishment after that. But I also try not to listen to the "itS all BEeN pLAnNeD FOr yEaRS" brigade either - I think some folk were so mentally harmed during that time, they might never recover. They see conspiracy in everything.
Dr Fuellmich and his team of expert witnesses exposed the deep corruption of the globalist Covid-supportive establishment. I posted a summary of Dr Fuellmich’s 2022 Covid-19 Crimes Against Humanity model trial here: https://metatron.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmichs-grand-jury-court.
Having seen what happened during Covid and having observed the public's behaviour immediately following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, plus various other world events, I'm starting to recognise the characteristic signs of mass formation psychosis and to me, the current hysteria re. 'chemtrails' and geoengineering bears the hallmarks of another mass formation event. I'm beginning to think that, rather than the public learning their lesson from having been fooled once, then twice, they are actually MORE likely to be fooled for a third time, not less. Which is quite bizarre. I hope I'm wrong.
Mass formation psychosis is not a medically recognized disorder. However, your point that people are now paying attention to the wizards behind the curtains that are working to control everything in the world is a great change that will hopefully result in a more alert and educated world. Forbes headline from 4 years ago, “A Bill Gates Venture Aims To Spray Dust Into The Atmosphere To Block The Sun. What Could Go Wrong” has finally hit home and people are more than conscious to globalists and their agenda. Thank goodness for the awakening!
I’m not sure that the public is becoming more and more gullible as they are taken for fools again and again on issue after issue. I think what we are seeing is how the public is ALWAYS gullible when the entire globalist establishment and MSM pump out the same, usually false narrative and psy-ops. The problem is that most people don’t have the time, inclination or capability to research the alt media.
Taking the war in Ukraine as an example, I am horrified at how the globalist establishment and MSM plug the false line that Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine was unprovoked and if the West gives in to Putin, he will invade Europe - and that most people seem to agree.
Talk about 1984 and the re-writing of history! Never a mention that Gorbachev was solemnly promised when the Berlin wall came down that Nato would never extend eastwards from Germany “by even an inch”. No mention of the CIA-supported 2014 Ukraine coup to oust the pro-Russia leader. No mention of the subsequent Ukraine civil war against the Russian-speaking people of the Donbas which killed tens of thousands. No mention of the US bio-labs sited in Ukraine. No mention that Putin had repeatedly warned that Ukraine joining Nato would be the last straw, analogous to Khruschev siting ballistic missiles in Cuba in 1962.
I also listen to well-educated people saying they have taken the latest Covid booster jab.
We can only hope that people like Donald Trump succeed in taking on and defeating the globalists. Ironically most people are opposed to Trump, their potential saviour, because he is so relentlessly demonised by the globalist establishment and MSM who recognise him as their potential nemesis.
The issue for me is the manmade chemicals being sprayed. As with everything synthetic, there will be downstream effects. Have these chemicals been subjected to scientific safety studies? Their effect on Asthma, COPD etc. Are they safe for children and the environment, what happens when incorporated into precipitation? I suspect none of these studies have been done.
Let's poison the air for the sake of the Net Zero folly. NO, NO, NO.
There’s a good chance that RFK Jr as Health Secretary and Lee Zeldin as head of the Environmental Protection Agency will set an example in the USA which the rest of the world will be obliged to follow.
And just to add to the insanity propoganda, the headline of a major British MSM newspaper today, was to warn us of the terrifying possibility we'll be hit by temperatures around 25°C / 77°F in the next few days! You just couldn't make it up 🤣
Which for most of us is a pleasant day 🤣
I’m happy to let the geoengineering hysteria flourish because it helps to rubbish the Net Zero agenda as the prospect of actually dimming sunlight by human endeavour is quite scary. Most people know that alleged man-made global warming is a nonsense and that trying to prevent it is a nonsense.
My cynical take on the motivation for such geoengineering, which simple physics dictates will have minimal and no lasting effect on the global climate is that when natural global cooling kicks in, as could happen within a few years (AMO, GSM), the corrupt establishment will be able to say “See, it worked, our geoengineering saved us from global boiling but that was only a temporary respite and we need to press ahead with the Net Zero decarbonisation agenda”.
The graph you show of UK sunshine hours vs surface temperature shows a 0.82 correlation coefficient. So is that the cause of the global warming observed in the last century, bearing in mind correlation doesn't prove causation? And is the increase in sunshine years due to less cloud cover? But I thought a warmer earth surface would increase evaporation from the oceans, which make up most of the earth's surface, and therefore likely increase cloud cover (or is that only low altitude clouds?). And where does back radiation caused by greenhouse gases including CO2 (the greenhouse effect) fit into this? Forgive me for feeling a little confused....
There is a useful graph in this 2014 Clive Best post showing cloud cover versus temperature from 1983 to 2008: https://clivebest.com/blog/?p=5694
It could be that the warming of the 1980-90s relates to the warming phase of the 70-year AMO cycle, followed by the flatlining plateau of its warm phase, to be followed by … guess what, a repeat of the 1960-70s new ice age scare? Schedule rudely interrupted by Hunga Tonga!
The Earth's oceans and atmosphere are an incredibly complex system, but my guess is that the response of that complex system to any perturbation will always be self-limiting such that an equilibrium state is maintained in the ling term. This does not mean that equilibrium prevails over shorter periods (e.g. decades). Hence, I imagine the response to increased solar radiation will be an increase in surface temperature initially, but then negative feedbacks will kick in (e.g. increasing cloud cover due to increased evaporation from sea surfaces) and thus limit the increase in temperature. In the real world, runaway global warming is extremely unlikely.
Exactly. The scare stories about tipping points and runaway global warming are unscientific BS. If nature didn’t abhor positive feedbacks the planet would have self-destructed long ago. The huge volume of water in the earth’s oceans keeps the climate stable though all manner of perturbations.
Thanks Jaime. We know from ConVid that governments are now expert at directing the narrative to suit their objective. They must employ thousands to gameplay every option and tactic to achieve their ends. Second guessing their strategy is a risky business and divides even those on the same side. We know they want to achieve total control over the world’s assets and the lives of the populace. The Climate Alarmism is the perfect tool. But deflection, using all manner psychological pressures and manipulation, confuses the issue and causes dissent even amongst those who know the endgame. This should be very evident to all after ConVid.
Global dimwitting, I like that. It's the usual suspects. I don't trust Neil Oliver, he was very happy with lockdown and posted lovely pics online of dog walks in Stirling. John Campbell has finally been red pilled but this is hardly his area of expertise. I think the covid jabs did more damage than we realise.....it was the best decision I ever made not to have the bloody things, and I don't trust govt or the medical establishment after that. But I also try not to listen to the "itS all BEeN pLAnNeD FOr yEaRS" brigade either - I think some folk were so mentally harmed during that time, they might never recover. They see conspiracy in everything.
You may be aware that the German/American attorney Dr Reiner Fuellmich has recently been imprisoned on shockingly trumped up charges for speaking out against the Covid plandemic: https://www.malone.news/p/the-persecution-of-dr-reiner-fuellmich-a9d.
Dr Fuellmich and his team of expert witnesses exposed the deep corruption of the globalist Covid-supportive establishment. I posted a summary of Dr Fuellmich’s 2022 Covid-19 Crimes Against Humanity model trial here: https://metatron.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmichs-grand-jury-court.
Having seen what happened during Covid and having observed the public's behaviour immediately following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, plus various other world events, I'm starting to recognise the characteristic signs of mass formation psychosis and to me, the current hysteria re. 'chemtrails' and geoengineering bears the hallmarks of another mass formation event. I'm beginning to think that, rather than the public learning their lesson from having been fooled once, then twice, they are actually MORE likely to be fooled for a third time, not less. Which is quite bizarre. I hope I'm wrong.
Mass formation psychosis is not a medically recognized disorder. However, your point that people are now paying attention to the wizards behind the curtains that are working to control everything in the world is a great change that will hopefully result in a more alert and educated world. Forbes headline from 4 years ago, “A Bill Gates Venture Aims To Spray Dust Into The Atmosphere To Block The Sun. What Could Go Wrong” has finally hit home and people are more than conscious to globalists and their agenda. Thank goodness for the awakening!
I’m not sure that the public is becoming more and more gullible as they are taken for fools again and again on issue after issue. I think what we are seeing is how the public is ALWAYS gullible when the entire globalist establishment and MSM pump out the same, usually false narrative and psy-ops. The problem is that most people don’t have the time, inclination or capability to research the alt media.
Taking the war in Ukraine as an example, I am horrified at how the globalist establishment and MSM plug the false line that Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine was unprovoked and if the West gives in to Putin, he will invade Europe - and that most people seem to agree.
Talk about 1984 and the re-writing of history! Never a mention that Gorbachev was solemnly promised when the Berlin wall came down that Nato would never extend eastwards from Germany “by even an inch”. No mention of the CIA-supported 2014 Ukraine coup to oust the pro-Russia leader. No mention of the subsequent Ukraine civil war against the Russian-speaking people of the Donbas which killed tens of thousands. No mention of the US bio-labs sited in Ukraine. No mention that Putin had repeatedly warned that Ukraine joining Nato would be the last straw, analogous to Khruschev siting ballistic missiles in Cuba in 1962.
I also listen to well-educated people saying they have taken the latest Covid booster jab.
We can only hope that people like Donald Trump succeed in taking on and defeating the globalists. Ironically most people are opposed to Trump, their potential saviour, because he is so relentlessly demonised by the globalist establishment and MSM who recognise him as their potential nemesis.
Daniel Jupp has a great article in TCW on how, in our globalist-controlled nightmare modern world, President Trump is universally reviled for his Ukraine war peace-making efforts: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/donald-trump-the-hated-thankless-and-only-peacemaker/.