It’s almost certainly going to be the ‘hottest July evah’, as in, it hasn’t been this hot since the last interglacial (the Eemian - the previous geologically brief warm period before the last Ice Age - which in turn lasted 100,000 years) when the Arctic was ice free in summer. Antonio Guterres, Secretary General of the UN, has said that we’ve left the era of global warming and we’re now in the era of global boiling. So, first it was Trump’s “
Does it occur to you for even a moment, that the reason corporate media makes confusing and hyperbolic statements about the climate crisis, is that the investors behind that media also invest in fossil fuels and they *want* people to not trust climate science?
The climate and extinction crisis is real, and here's what may happen if we don't reverse it immediately.
Nature Is Giving Humanity Our Final Extinction Crisis Warning
There's a lot more money pushing the global warming crisis extinction narrative. It's endless and all-encompassing.
The narrative is confusing because, just like critical race theory, colonialism, white privilege, gender identity, etc, etc, it's mostly rubbish mixed in with outright lies.
As someone who lives in Central England, it looks like the Global Boiling could reach a peak of 21 degrees Celsius before the end of the month and there is even hazy sunshine at the moment!
“Clearly all this stuff is globally co-ordinated but with what aim? Even if you believe in all this human CO2 causes global catastrophe nonsense, the path to net zero is supposed to take 30 years or 40 years if you’re China and India. What is the point of stirring up the masses to such an extent? The masses in the UK are missing out on all this boiling and are watching cricketers dodging showers.
It makes me think that the globalist powers that be are planning something crazy like Gates’s sun dimming and geo-engineering.”
Do you have any theories to explain the co-ordinated hysteria?
I was asking myself the same questions. I came up with this but would be interested in other angles too.
Clearly it comes from the UN, WEF world government wanting Davos crowd. The biggest justification for world government are big dangerous problems individual states can't solve. Problems that scare people and have no national boundaries:
1. Viruses
2. Climate
3. Internet, Disinformation Harm
4. ?
They did the virus thing and WHO grabbing more and more power through it.
They exaggerate or even invent the climate change dangers
They work on social media censorship in many countries
What always gives it away is the top-down lock step way they do it. It's not coming from the people.
They want to impress the easy to impress-ones: Young and dumb. We oldies die out. They are in for the long game.
The young ones need to wake up. And they probably will when they lose their spoiled privileges like flying to Ibiza for the weekend.
"CTIL Files #1: US And UK Military Contractors Created Sweeping Plan For Global Censorship In 2018, New Documents Show
Whistleblower makes trove of new documents available to Public and Racket, showing the birth of the Censorship Industrial Complex in reaction to Brexit and Trump election in 2016"
It would seem that the global censorship conspiracy theory wasn't just a theory...
You mention flying where there are hundreds of initiatives worldwide to develop e-fuels using power to liquids technology for aviation. This isn’t cheap and air fares will be higher but commercial aviation did exist before Ryanair and EasyJet. This kind of technology development is happening without political intervention and I don’t see why the masses need to be stirred up about it.
I said a few weeks ago that we should expect an intense climate propaganda campaign, focussed on extreme weather, akin to the globally coordinated Covid psyop. That seems to be happening. Why they have chosen this particular moment to accelerate the green agenda is anyone's guess, but we should expect the worst. They seem quite desperate to me, like this was not part of their original plan.
I've been climbing big mountains for 30+ years now and I can guarantee you that glaciers up high have been seriously receding for all that time. Some of the African ones on Kili have completely gone.
It's also hotter than fuck in the NE usa, moreso than I ever remember as a child.
That being said, I also know their meteorological models are absolute rubbish and attributing these natural changes in a system unimaginably complex to a single gas at .05% is completely absurd.
They used to kill babies on pyramids to make it rain. It appears we haven't progressed at all as a species.
The temperate glaciers here in NZ are also receding like crazy.
Arctic is also melting and there can be no serious doubt about this. Antarctic on the other hand is not showing any signs of doing so despite alarm over WAIS or the Peninsula.
And I completely agree with you about CO2, in fact the records show that CO2 has always followed warming in past and has never been the instigator. I challenged a climate scientist at a public meeting on this (I am technically a climate scientist myself but don't work in the area) and he repeated the mantra in public but when I went up to him afterwards and told him that I had trained in the same Geography department that he had he kind of backed off and admitted that warming in past was more to do with sun and that the Antarctic was not showing signs of melting. Question, did he feel the need to deny what he knew when he was on stage due to the 4 other government scientists on stage with him.
I'd also suggest that industrial pollution in the Northern Hemisphere is the probable culprit. Maybe somebody should check the sunshine records around the Ruhr Valley over the last 100 years.
Jul 28, 2023·edited Jul 28, 2023Liked by Jaime Jessop
Remember, it was the Russians who hacked the East Anglia University to reveal the emails showing that warming was not happening. In their emails, those "scientists" were discussing how to fudge the data to keep the climate nonsense going. Of course it was claimed in the media that the emails were fake, kind of like the Hunter Biden laptop.
The point I kept making back then was, "Release the raw data!" East Anglia University would never release the raw data that *proved* their findings -- because it was not "science" it was fraud.
If the emails were fake, then releasing the raw data would prove everything. It would have cleared their names. But they never released it.
They were caught with their pants down. Of course, that didn't make big headlines at the time, but it should always be considered when anyone tells us that we're going to die from "Global Boiling." 🤣😂
I beg to differ on this. The data was from all around the world. There was literally no way of standardizing it but if the raw data was given to the Koch backed types asking for it then they would have mangled it for their own purposes. Maybe you can accuse the scientists on those emails of attempting to do the same thing but I actually don't think that they were.
The truth is somewhere between WEF backed alarmism and Koch (oil & gas i.e. via the Heartland Institute) positions.
They could have made the information public. Post it on the Internet for everyone to see. There are plenty of individual analysts who could have looked at it.
They were going back and forth in the emails about how to skew the data to show what they wanted it to show.
They're frauds, even without the raw data.
In 2022 the Tonga eruption caused huge amounts of water vapor to enter the stratosphere. More than they have ever recorded, it will definitely effect the climate.
And I agree that the information should be transparent. But I looked at the East Anglia stuff probably 12 years ago and I didn't see that the claims held water at the time.
I think this will backfire - the "boiling" thing is so extreme and hysterical - and so open for mockery - that it will turn a lot of people off. and more people will start to see the fear mongering for what it is.
Ah yes, he did. The reference to "good old global warming" was cynical, as was Trump's use of the phrase when he said a few years ago that 'we could do with some good old global warming in the US now' during a particularly severe winter. The global warming cultists freaked out of course, accusing him of confusing 'weather' with 'climate' - which they never do, as we know.
"The state of the atmosphere at a given time and place, with respect to variables such as temperature, moisture, wind velocity, and barometric pressure."
Whereas 'climate' is what you you do when you see a mountain you want to get to the top of. :)
'Weather' you 'climate' and get to the top is another matter!
I don't understand it. With all this 'boiling' going on, how come there are so many wildfires? You wouldn't expect that to happen when the planet's being boiled. Maybe we should change the name from the 'era of global boiling' to the 'era of flash-frying'?
Does it occur to you for even a moment, that the reason corporate media makes confusing and hyperbolic statements about the climate crisis, is that the investors behind that media also invest in fossil fuels and they *want* people to not trust climate science?
The climate and extinction crisis is real, and here's what may happen if we don't reverse it immediately.
Nature Is Giving Humanity Our Final Extinction Crisis Warning
https://ericbrooks.substack.com/p/nature-is-giving-humanity-our-final
There's a lot more money pushing the global warming crisis extinction narrative. It's endless and all-encompassing.
The narrative is confusing because, just like critical race theory, colonialism, white privilege, gender identity, etc, etc, it's mostly rubbish mixed in with outright lies.
It's not about CMEs. Check this out.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2093264/Forget-global-warming--Cycle-25-need-worry-NASA-scientists-right-Thames-freezing-again.html
Ouch! Facts hurt! Now wait for the steam to emerge from the propagandists' nostrils.
As someone who lives in Central England, it looks like the Global Boiling could reach a peak of 21 degrees Celsius before the end of the month and there is even hazy sunshine at the moment!
I posted this on John Dee’s Climate Normal
“Clearly all this stuff is globally co-ordinated but with what aim? Even if you believe in all this human CO2 causes global catastrophe nonsense, the path to net zero is supposed to take 30 years or 40 years if you’re China and India. What is the point of stirring up the masses to such an extent? The masses in the UK are missing out on all this boiling and are watching cricketers dodging showers.
It makes me think that the globalist powers that be are planning something crazy like Gates’s sun dimming and geo-engineering.”
Do you have any theories to explain the co-ordinated hysteria?
I was asking myself the same questions. I came up with this but would be interested in other angles too.
Clearly it comes from the UN, WEF world government wanting Davos crowd. The biggest justification for world government are big dangerous problems individual states can't solve. Problems that scare people and have no national boundaries:
1. Viruses
2. Climate
3. Internet, Disinformation Harm
4. ?
They did the virus thing and WHO grabbing more and more power through it.
They exaggerate or even invent the climate change dangers
They work on social media censorship in many countries
What always gives it away is the top-down lock step way they do it. It's not coming from the people.
They want to impress the easy to impress-ones: Young and dumb. We oldies die out. They are in for the long game.
The young ones need to wake up. And they probably will when they lose their spoiled privileges like flying to Ibiza for the weekend.
https://public.substack.com/p/ctil-files-1-us-and-uk-military-contractors?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web
"CTIL Files #1: US And UK Military Contractors Created Sweeping Plan For Global Censorship In 2018, New Documents Show
Whistleblower makes trove of new documents available to Public and Racket, showing the birth of the Censorship Industrial Complex in reaction to Brexit and Trump election in 2016"
It would seem that the global censorship conspiracy theory wasn't just a theory...
You mention flying where there are hundreds of initiatives worldwide to develop e-fuels using power to liquids technology for aviation. This isn’t cheap and air fares will be higher but commercial aviation did exist before Ryanair and EasyJet. This kind of technology development is happening without political intervention and I don’t see why the masses need to be stirred up about it.
https://safplusconsortium.com/
https://www.norsk-e-fuel.com/
Oh, I forgot aliens. Just starting in the US. Malone seems to fall for it, I think (Just read a few paragraphs)
I said a few weeks ago that we should expect an intense climate propaganda campaign, focussed on extreme weather, akin to the globally coordinated Covid psyop. That seems to be happening. Why they have chosen this particular moment to accelerate the green agenda is anyone's guess, but we should expect the worst. They seem quite desperate to me, like this was not part of their original plan.
Money is always a good start, make the markets fluctuate and take advantage.
It is also seeing who is dim enough to fall for the tricks.
I've been climbing big mountains for 30+ years now and I can guarantee you that glaciers up high have been seriously receding for all that time. Some of the African ones on Kili have completely gone.
It's also hotter than fuck in the NE usa, moreso than I ever remember as a child.
That being said, I also know their meteorological models are absolute rubbish and attributing these natural changes in a system unimaginably complex to a single gas at .05% is completely absurd.
They used to kill babies on pyramids to make it rain. It appears we haven't progressed at all as a species.
The temperate glaciers here in NZ are also receding like crazy.
Arctic is also melting and there can be no serious doubt about this. Antarctic on the other hand is not showing any signs of doing so despite alarm over WAIS or the Peninsula.
And I completely agree with you about CO2, in fact the records show that CO2 has always followed warming in past and has never been the instigator. I challenged a climate scientist at a public meeting on this (I am technically a climate scientist myself but don't work in the area) and he repeated the mantra in public but when I went up to him afterwards and told him that I had trained in the same Geography department that he had he kind of backed off and admitted that warming in past was more to do with sun and that the Antarctic was not showing signs of melting. Question, did he feel the need to deny what he knew when he was on stage due to the 4 other government scientists on stage with him.
I'd also suggest that industrial pollution in the Northern Hemisphere is the probable culprit. Maybe somebody should check the sunshine records around the Ruhr Valley over the last 100 years.
Heatwaves were hotter in the US during the 1930s.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2022/07/20/heat-wave-1936/
Jaime, you might like this one.
"Climate Science" tends to involve only things *on* the planet. Why are scientists so hell-bent on ignoring the sun?
https://ogre.substack.com/p/global-warming-is-going-to-the-back
After writing hundreds of scientific papers attempting to explain the global warming pause 1998-2013, they just decided to erase it in the end.
Remember, it was the Russians who hacked the East Anglia University to reveal the emails showing that warming was not happening. In their emails, those "scientists" were discussing how to fudge the data to keep the climate nonsense going. Of course it was claimed in the media that the emails were fake, kind of like the Hunter Biden laptop.
The point I kept making back then was, "Release the raw data!" East Anglia University would never release the raw data that *proved* their findings -- because it was not "science" it was fraud.
If the emails were fake, then releasing the raw data would prove everything. It would have cleared their names. But they never released it.
They were caught with their pants down. Of course, that didn't make big headlines at the time, but it should always be considered when anyone tells us that we're going to die from "Global Boiling." 🤣😂
I beg to differ on this. The data was from all around the world. There was literally no way of standardizing it but if the raw data was given to the Koch backed types asking for it then they would have mangled it for their own purposes. Maybe you can accuse the scientists on those emails of attempting to do the same thing but I actually don't think that they were.
The truth is somewhere between WEF backed alarmism and Koch (oil & gas i.e. via the Heartland Institute) positions.
They could have made the information public. Post it on the Internet for everyone to see. There are plenty of individual analysts who could have looked at it.
They were going back and forth in the emails about how to skew the data to show what they wanted it to show.
They're frauds, even without the raw data.
In 2022 the Tonga eruption caused huge amounts of water vapor to enter the stratosphere. More than they have ever recorded, it will definitely effect the climate.
Were you aware of this?
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/tonga-eruption-blasted-unprecedented-amount-of-water-into-stratosphere
Clouds were not considered in most of the climate models as well. It's all nonsense.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/clouds-may-be-the-key-to-a-climate-modeling-mystery/#
I'm aware of the Tongan eruption yes.
But how did you hear about it? I'm just curious.
And I agree that the information should be transparent. But I looked at the East Anglia stuff probably 12 years ago and I didn't see that the claims held water at the time.
Meanwhile in dear old Australia we were promised a warmer drier winter. No sign of that yet, I can’t get warm enough.😏
I think this will backfire - the "boiling" thing is so extreme and hysterical - and so open for mockery - that it will turn a lot of people off. and more people will start to see the fear mongering for what it is.
I keep saying to people things get sillier and sillier to see who is really silly and those who see through the exaggeration.
Great article, but "Trump’s “good old global warming”?
Pretty sure that he considered it to be bullshit straight away.
Hence leaving the Paris accord and telling the UN and the WHO to piss off.
Ah yes, he did. The reference to "good old global warming" was cynical, as was Trump's use of the phrase when he said a few years ago that 'we could do with some good old global warming in the US now' during a particularly severe winter. The global warming cultists freaked out of course, accusing him of confusing 'weather' with 'climate' - which they never do, as we know.
'Weather' is:
"The state of the atmosphere at a given time and place, with respect to variables such as temperature, moisture, wind velocity, and barometric pressure."
Whereas 'climate' is what you you do when you see a mountain you want to get to the top of. :)
'Weather' you 'climate' and get to the top is another matter!
Thanks for the explanation Jaime.
I hadn't heard that.
Anything that makes the cultists explode is on the right side of history.
I've added a note at the bottom of the article to this effect.
This is too funny!
I don't understand it. With all this 'boiling' going on, how come there are so many wildfires? You wouldn't expect that to happen when the planet's being boiled. Maybe we should change the name from the 'era of global boiling' to the 'era of flash-frying'?
There's plenty of wildfires because there are plenty of arsonists.
Wildfires don't suddenly happen simultaneously across Canada all on their own...
Wildfires - lack of forest management and arson.