All are deemed to be suitable for sacrifice merely to please and accommodate the demented wishes and insane fantasies of the "powers that be" who are scripturally identified as the "workers of iniquity" that God HATES.
Yes, my point exactly. At two score years and ten my fingers are starting to be affected by arthritis, and are much worst in cold damp weather. I feel like bringing a court action for more warm weather.
The other claimant is also a disabled man who is claiming he is uniquely vulnerable to heatwaves . . . . .
The difference here is that FoE are taking the government to court over claims that it is not doing enough to ADAPT to the impacts of climate change, because I think they would be on a sticky wicket trying to claim that the UK is not 'doing its bit' to MITIGATE climate change - our crazy politicians have already gone WAY TOO FAR in that respect, ahead of most other countries. But either way, tax payers are being robbed to pay for schemes deemed necessary because of the projections of climate models! And the current coastal erosion in Norfolk has NOTHING whatsoever to with a modest rise in sea level.
Curiously, every time I've boarded an aeroplane to fly to somewhere warm in the winter, the majority of my fellow passengers have been on the older side in order to avail ourselves of the more clement climate twenty or thirty degrees South of the UK, and I've never noticed a significant number coming back to the frigid UK in wooden boxes...
Ah, so that's the plan obviously. Old folk from northern Europe will be banned from taking foreign holidays to sunny climes in order to protect their human rights!
For decades our Uniparty politicians have been lying, suppressing the truth and making blatantly false assertions on alleged man-made global warming, aka “climate change”.
Most people accept that politicians are self-serving bar stewards but it comes as a shock that a panel of supposedly wise, intelligent judges should unquestioningly accept and regurgitate the criminally-false climate change narrative pushed by Uniparty politicians and their globalist overlords, to mandate the entirety of its mumbo-jumbo into law.
The falsity of the establishment climate change narrative is obvious to any critical thinker, as is the ulterior motive of using it as a trojan horse to impose tyrannical one-world governance.
In a recording made in 2015 around the time of COP21, Christopher Monckton described how the United Nations has been the main leader of the climate change scan, lying and cheating about global warming since 1992, focused always on working towards undemocratic one-world governance. Yet here we are in 2024, post their Covid "plandemic", allowing them to get closer and closer to their objective. https://twitter.com/juneslater17/status/1760726882641924278?t=gfMzasXhJNboh5VyNkVpPA&s=19.
All our treasonous Con/Lab/Lib/SNP Uniparty politicians are complicit in this ulterior agenda. The essential first step to getting out of this mess is for people to stop voting for Uniparty politicians.
They are effectively working against their own best interests, if we're to believe their data.
And you're right that study that concerns *only* 2015 summer excess deaths is worthless. Without having compared it to winter of the same year, it's beyond cherry picking, it's just ignorant.
It's also interesting that they aren't showing data newer than 2015. If everything is supposed to be warming, wouldn't they want newer data?
It's like making legislative decisions based on an anomaly. And we all know science is best when it's *not* repeatable. 🙄
Too many people are scientifically illiterate these days. We need more nerds to straighten things out!
While there were numerous third party intervenes (the usual suspects) in the recent ECHR case, all falling over themselves to support the claimants, not a single witness, claimant, or intervene, so far as I can see, supplied the Court with the highly relevant information that many more people die of cold than of heat. Not that the Court would have been interested, if the judgment (even including the partially dissenting judgment) is anything to go by. So much for objective justice.
Also, not a single intervention by any scientist, challenging or supporting the scientific evidence for an increase in the severity and frequency of heatwaves in Europe/Central Europe and their attribution to climate change, other than the usual hand-waving waffle from the IPCC. I intend to cover this topic in a subsequent post, because it's important that people understand the scandalous lack of scientific evidence to support this judgement and that they understand the existence of the specific science and data which casts serious doubt upon this judgement. It seems we don't have evidence-based law-making, we have politically, financially and ideologically driven law making which has been made unchallengeable and beyond the reach of democracy.
All are deemed to be suitable for sacrifice merely to please and accommodate the demented wishes and insane fantasies of the "powers that be" who are scripturally identified as the "workers of iniquity" that God HATES.
Yes, my point exactly. At two score years and ten my fingers are starting to be affected by arthritis, and are much worst in cold damp weather. I feel like bringing a court action for more warm weather.
It seems that taxpayers will be forced to spend billions in a vain attempt to prevent coastal erosion in Norfolk.
https://www.politics.co.uk/opinion-former/press-release/2024/04/12/inadequate-climate-adaptation-plan-to-be-examined-by-high-court-friends-of-the-earth/
The other claimant is also a disabled man who is claiming he is uniquely vulnerable to heatwaves . . . . .
The difference here is that FoE are taking the government to court over claims that it is not doing enough to ADAPT to the impacts of climate change, because I think they would be on a sticky wicket trying to claim that the UK is not 'doing its bit' to MITIGATE climate change - our crazy politicians have already gone WAY TOO FAR in that respect, ahead of most other countries. But either way, tax payers are being robbed to pay for schemes deemed necessary because of the projections of climate models! And the current coastal erosion in Norfolk has NOTHING whatsoever to with a modest rise in sea level.
Curiously, every time I've boarded an aeroplane to fly to somewhere warm in the winter, the majority of my fellow passengers have been on the older side in order to avail ourselves of the more clement climate twenty or thirty degrees South of the UK, and I've never noticed a significant number coming back to the frigid UK in wooden boxes...
Strange or what!
Just back from 30 degrees south myself! Everyone there loved it.
Ah, so that's the plan obviously. Old folk from northern Europe will be banned from taking foreign holidays to sunny climes in order to protect their human rights!
For decades our Uniparty politicians have been lying, suppressing the truth and making blatantly false assertions on alleged man-made global warming, aka “climate change”.
Most people accept that politicians are self-serving bar stewards but it comes as a shock that a panel of supposedly wise, intelligent judges should unquestioningly accept and regurgitate the criminally-false climate change narrative pushed by Uniparty politicians and their globalist overlords, to mandate the entirety of its mumbo-jumbo into law.
The falsity of the establishment climate change narrative is obvious to any critical thinker, as is the ulterior motive of using it as a trojan horse to impose tyrannical one-world governance.
In a recording made in 2015 around the time of COP21, Christopher Monckton described how the United Nations has been the main leader of the climate change scan, lying and cheating about global warming since 1992, focused always on working towards undemocratic one-world governance. Yet here we are in 2024, post their Covid "plandemic", allowing them to get closer and closer to their objective. https://twitter.com/juneslater17/status/1760726882641924278?t=gfMzasXhJNboh5VyNkVpPA&s=19.
All our treasonous Con/Lab/Lib/SNP Uniparty politicians are complicit in this ulterior agenda. The essential first step to getting out of this mess is for people to stop voting for Uniparty politicians.
Brilliant!
They are effectively working against their own best interests, if we're to believe their data.
And you're right that study that concerns *only* 2015 summer excess deaths is worthless. Without having compared it to winter of the same year, it's beyond cherry picking, it's just ignorant.
It's also interesting that they aren't showing data newer than 2015. If everything is supposed to be warming, wouldn't they want newer data?
It's like making legislative decisions based on an anomaly. And we all know science is best when it's *not* repeatable. 🙄
Too many people are scientifically illiterate these days. We need more nerds to straighten things out!
Have reduce the population somehow. Oh & make some more money in the process.
While there were numerous third party intervenes (the usual suspects) in the recent ECHR case, all falling over themselves to support the claimants, not a single witness, claimant, or intervene, so far as I can see, supplied the Court with the highly relevant information that many more people die of cold than of heat. Not that the Court would have been interested, if the judgment (even including the partially dissenting judgment) is anything to go by. So much for objective justice.
Also, not a single intervention by any scientist, challenging or supporting the scientific evidence for an increase in the severity and frequency of heatwaves in Europe/Central Europe and their attribution to climate change, other than the usual hand-waving waffle from the IPCC. I intend to cover this topic in a subsequent post, because it's important that people understand the scandalous lack of scientific evidence to support this judgement and that they understand the existence of the specific science and data which casts serious doubt upon this judgement. It seems we don't have evidence-based law-making, we have politically, financially and ideologically driven law making which has been made unchallengeable and beyond the reach of democracy.