So, here we are at last. Peak insanity in the climate change grift, where any Tom, Dick or Harry can now take their government to court to argue successfully that their ‘yuman’ rights have been violated because of a gloriously hot summer or even a few hot days in an otherwise unremarkable or abysmal summer caused by the failure of said government to ‘do its bit’ in addressing the putative ‘man-made climate crisis’. A group of female pensioners in Switzerland did just that and the ECHR has ruled in their favour.
I'm intrigued by the statement "Of all climate hazards, heat-related mortality in Europe, for people over 65, is by far the most significant cause of death." I feel pretty confident in saying that, no matter where on the planet, cold-related deaths far exceed those that are heat-related. Or does "heat-related" in the context of their statement include all deaths related to temperature (hot or cold)? That would make more sense. Needs clarification!
It will be interesting to see if Swiss government lawyers challenge this ruling, and on what basis. If they decide to go down the route of demonstrating the failure of the plaintiff to scientifically validate their claim of damages, then I'll gladly permit them to use the content of this post . . . . . for a modest fee of course!
This is a very bad precedent for democracy, when unelected legal authorities think they can legally enforce laws based on clealy-faked, never-validated, never-proven, unscientific climate mumgo-jumbo pushed by lying, treasonous Uniparty politicians.
Insanity is the rule of the day. Sane thinking and facts based on actual truths went permanently out the door in 2016 when Trump derangement syndrome baked in with MSM and the puppet masters. But it had its beginning with the Obama Hussein administration and political correctness. It kicked into overdrive with the genocide plandemic and now we live in an alternate reality where nothing that is actually true is actually true anymore despite volumes of evidence to prove it. Pick any subject that has concrete, irrefutable proof and the puppet masters have turned it into an untruth.
What gets me are the sheer numbers of people who are duped but all this insanity. I never thought I would live in a real dystopian society that only Hollywood could dream up but it sure does appear to be where we are. Which begs the question…are there enough of the red-pilled people to enable us to leave the theater or are we doomed?
The EHRC is a political court, not a court in any conventional sense, whose mission is to further the causes of the governments who appoint its “judges”.
The case for the U.K. leaving the ECHR is overwhelming. This is just the latest piece of nonsense to add to the already substantial pile.
I'm intrigued by the statement "Of all climate hazards, heat-related mortality in Europe, for people over 65, is by far the most significant cause of death." I feel pretty confident in saying that, no matter where on the planet, cold-related deaths far exceed those that are heat-related. Or does "heat-related" in the context of their statement include all deaths related to temperature (hot or cold)? That would make more sense. Needs clarification!
It will be interesting to see if Swiss government lawyers challenge this ruling, and on what basis. If they decide to go down the route of demonstrating the failure of the plaintiff to scientifically validate their claim of damages, then I'll gladly permit them to use the content of this post . . . . . for a modest fee of course!
It appears to me that this was a deliberately organised legal action. A bit like dear old Greta is a stooge for the globalists.
Can I say f'ing boomers 🤬
Nice clip of the McEnroe classic.
This is a very bad precedent for democracy, when unelected legal authorities think they can legally enforce laws based on clealy-faked, never-validated, never-proven, unscientific climate mumgo-jumbo pushed by lying, treasonous Uniparty politicians.
Insanity is the rule of the day. Sane thinking and facts based on actual truths went permanently out the door in 2016 when Trump derangement syndrome baked in with MSM and the puppet masters. But it had its beginning with the Obama Hussein administration and political correctness. It kicked into overdrive with the genocide plandemic and now we live in an alternate reality where nothing that is actually true is actually true anymore despite volumes of evidence to prove it. Pick any subject that has concrete, irrefutable proof and the puppet masters have turned it into an untruth.
What gets me are the sheer numbers of people who are duped but all this insanity. I never thought I would live in a real dystopian society that only Hollywood could dream up but it sure does appear to be where we are. Which begs the question…are there enough of the red-pilled people to enable us to leave the theater or are we doomed?
The EHRC is a political court, not a court in any conventional sense, whose mission is to further the causes of the governments who appoint its “judges”.
The case for the U.K. leaving the ECHR is overwhelming. This is just the latest piece of nonsense to add to the already substantial pile.
"Peak insanity", Jaime?
I wish I could believe that, but I've a nasty suspicion we ain't seen nuthin yet!