The Covid Iatrogenocide: If Not The Holocaust, Then Shall I Compare Thee To A Summer's Day?

I have now lost any patience or any inclination to be polite with those who frown self-righteously upon the mere mention of the Holocaust in the same sentence as the Covid iatrogenic mass murder which has taken place over the last three years and is ongoing, much less those who will spit blood and feathers whenever any person dares to make the direct comparison, claiming righteous indignation on behalf of the victims of the Nazi Holocaust whilst ignoring the millions of entirely avoidable iatrogenic ‘Covid’ deaths. In fact, the next time I come across such an individual, I am inclined to unleash a shit load of pent up rage. Because I’m sick. Sick of reading about death and suffering, brought about by a ‘vaccination’ which was supposed to save lives, not cripple, maim, injure, debilitate, devastate and ultimately destroy lives.

These kids, for example, who could never, in a million years, have given informed consent to being injected. All dead. All murdered by their idiotic, wilfully ignorant and negligent parents or others who coerced/mandated them to receive the shots. So what if they were not lead into the gas chambers? They were lead to their deaths at the point of a needle by those who could have, should have known better. They were executed, sacrificed to the Gods of ‘Safetyism’, slaughtered to appease a morally corrupt code of conduct fuelled by a rampant social contagion manifesting as a toxic mix of do-gooder virtue signalling, ignorance, stupidity, culpability, greed and fear-based paranoia.

Children 5-12 years old who died after taking Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: here are 25 children who died from mRNA jabs, while 0 healthy children died from COVID-19 infection itself

Just the tip of a very large iceberg. Millions have died. Millions more will die. All deaths were avoidable and predictable. If that’s not comparable to the Nazi Holocaust then I don’t know what is. Nay, if that’s not a 21st Century Holocaust gone global, then I don’t know what is. And yet, for the ‘crime’ of quoting an Israeli doctor who believed that the Covid vaccine rollout was the worst human atrocity since the Holocaust, Andrew Bridgen has been excommunicated from the Tory Party and has to suffer the indignity of journalistic hit-jobs like this from Fraser Myers in Spiked Online of all places:

It can be tempting to ignore the anti-vax conspiracy theorists – the people who believe the Covid vaccines are killing hundreds of thousands and injuring millions, and that it’s all being covered up by the powers-that-be. After all, these beliefs are mainly confined to a small but vocal fringe. But now that this tendency counts a British MP among its ranks, we cannot afford to let it slide. It is simply too irrational to shrug off – it needs to be challenged head on.

That MP is Andrew Bridgen, the member for North West Leicestershire. This week, we learned that he has been expelled from the Conservative Party for his anti-vax agitation (he was initially suspended back in January).

‘Anti-vax agitation’. He means pointing out the incontrovertible evidence of very significant vaccine harms, backed up by real data and real science. That’s what Myers euphemistically refers to as ‘anti-vax agitation’, as if Bridgen was some scummy, low-life political agitator with nefarious aims. Perhaps Myers should look in the mirror.

Myers then goes into full on anti-Holocaust comparison mode:

The online version of Bridgen believes that there is a conspiracy against the public. In an interview last year with NHS100k, a group representing healthcare staff opposed to vaccine mandates, he spoke of a plot around the pandemic that ‘would have taken a lot of planning over many, many years – an awful lot of organisation and money’. Most infamously, in the tweet that led to his suspension, he claimed that the vaccines were the ‘biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust’. This is not ‘just asking questions’. This is not ‘raising concerns’. This is exploiting the mass murder of six million Jews to bolster a blatantly false claim.

Even before Bridgen compared the vaccines to the Holocaust directly, he often complained that the vaccine rollout was in breach of the Nuremberg Code. As most people know, this code of ethical principles on medical experiments was drawn up after the Holocaust. To say that the vaccines breach the code is to suggest there’s something a bit Hitler about them.

In truth, the Nuremberg Code applies only to medical experiments – not to vaccines that have already passed clinical trials, have been approved by medical regulators and have been rolled out, in the UK at least, on a largely voluntary basis. There are very good and principled reasons to object to coercive measures like vaccine mandates or vaccine passports. But even those policies are not infringements of the Nuremberg principles.

So if I have the misfortune to come across Myers online or some other rabid objector to Holocaust comparisons, I might initially be tempted to be sarcastic and query whether, if comparisons to the Nazi Holocaust are verboten, should I then compare the Covid iatrogenocide to a summer’s day? Would that be more fitting and appropriate?

This attempt at mockery probably will fall flat on its face because Covidians are immune to humour, even the blackest. So then I’ll just let loose with the pent up rage number.