Omg you just made me laugh out loud 🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 just listening to The Dalek. Every time I hear him say "coalition of the willing" I mishear it as Willy and you can imagine the mental image. Einstein - the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. That's EXACTLY what Stoma is proposing - more of the same but with British troops. I could weep with frustration. He thinks he's bloody Churchill or Thatcher (strange, no labour equivalent?) but he's not even Tony Blair 😂
I‘ve just happened across a quite different twist on the Ukraine narrative: "Zelensky the UK and EU were playing the US because the British had already signed a deal that provided Ukraine "security guarantees" and right of access to Ukraine's gas, oil and rare earth minerals, oversight of Ukraine's ports and opportunity to invest in the rebuilding of Ukraine (signed between the two nations three days before President Trump's inauguration, on the 17th of January 2025) and they were looking to sucker us into providing security for THEIR exploitation of Ukraine": https://x.com/T_S_P_O_O_K_Y/status/1896234070230937771.
Getting involved in Ukraine is a catastrophe. I recently watched the Oliver stone film Ukraine on Fire and the situation there was a a political tinderbox before the war. There will never be peace in the country even if the war stops.
Starmer is an utter disgrace. Traitor to his nation, his people. Every area he delves into becomes worse, from winter fuel allowance for old age pensioners being stopped, to allowing mass immigration to increase under his watch, prosecuting innocent White Brits for social media posts, to advocating non existent custodial sentences for child sex offenders and violent offences.
He will be decimated at the ballot box.
I would not trust anything Starmer puts his name to, especially when dealing with Ukraine and Russia. He must be learning disabled to dabble in such affairs so aggressively.
Europe does not have the resources to fight Russia and win. I can't imagine Europe will put boots on the ground in Ukraine but who knows... I don't imagine the US being there for Europe if they start getting their asses kicked, article 5 or no. The tornado swirls but sitting calmly in its eye is Russia who has said nothing and for who nothing has changed since thr war's inception.
I'm looking forward to it all falling apart, like everything our inept establishment turns its hand to.
The state makes everything worse, it's not like the collective western leaders, sans Trump, are suddenly going to making sensible, rational decisions. They'll mess everything up and then run away into the arms of their wealthy benefactors, leaving new sewer rats to disclaim all responsibility.
They've shown the entire world that they'd rather have war than peace and they won't hesitate to send the country's youth off to be turned into pink mist, and a fair proportion of our weak-minded, gullible population will jump at the chance to go.
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."
I'm not sure I'm old enough to remember a time when they acted in accordance with, or for the benefit of their citizens. Maybe they never did.
There is no way Trump will want anything to do with that “deal!” Trump is not a pacifist, but at this point he will want nothing to do with Zelensky-y or Starmer and Macron as his warmongering wingmen. This was all planned and Trump intends to lead when it comes to any agreement. When you write a book called “The Art of the Deal,” there is no way he will let a couple of pea shooters put together a deal where the US provides weapons for another never ending war.
He hasn't vetoed it YET. He wasn't going to embarrass Starmer in front of the media by saying no way Jose, we ain't accepting your deal, was he? He's a canny operator, keeping his powder dry.
Trump is a spread-sheet kind of a person and cost vs potential value is what he based his Ukraine deal on. Hard to say what the ultimate outcome will be there. I do believe Trump is very serious about Greenland if Denmark isn’t serious about working with him. Especially since Russia is pushing into the Arctic.
The Black Belt Barrister has analysed the White House Zelensky/Trump so-called fracas, as the encounter is portrayed by the bought-and-paid-for MSM, and concludes that Zelensky was to blame: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtmMl8ISPcY.
He is running a poll on his channel (easily accessed via the show notes) asking his viewers if they agree with Starmer’s assertion that Zelensky has “full backing across the United Kingdom”. With 35k votes cast the result was Yes 15%, No 85%.
BBB is awesome. I'm not in agreement. Gbnews running a similar poll, and something like 90% saying no, they are not in support of Ukraine. We don't wish them any harm, obvs, but we have the brains to see where this is leading unlike the clowns in the HOC.
Omg you just made me laugh out loud 🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 just listening to The Dalek. Every time I hear him say "coalition of the willing" I mishear it as Willy and you can imagine the mental image. Einstein - the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. That's EXACTLY what Stoma is proposing - more of the same but with British troops. I could weep with frustration. He thinks he's bloody Churchill or Thatcher (strange, no labour equivalent?) but he's not even Tony Blair 😂
Another Ukraine nugget from Jeff Childers: Zelenksy personally pushed through a law outright banning Ukraine from negotiating with Russia so long as Putin remains president: https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/one-month-monday-march-3-2025-c-and.
I‘ve just happened across a quite different twist on the Ukraine narrative: "Zelensky the UK and EU were playing the US because the British had already signed a deal that provided Ukraine "security guarantees" and right of access to Ukraine's gas, oil and rare earth minerals, oversight of Ukraine's ports and opportunity to invest in the rebuilding of Ukraine (signed between the two nations three days before President Trump's inauguration, on the 17th of January 2025) and they were looking to sucker us into providing security for THEIR exploitation of Ukraine": https://x.com/T_S_P_O_O_K_Y/status/1896234070230937771.
Getting involved in Ukraine is a catastrophe. I recently watched the Oliver stone film Ukraine on Fire and the situation there was a a political tinderbox before the war. There will never be peace in the country even if the war stops.
https://youtu.be/pKcmNGvaDUs?si=dPmA2WLYPKQD9-Vm
We'll all go together when we go.
"War is Peace" in New Speak
Starmer is an utter disgrace. Traitor to his nation, his people. Every area he delves into becomes worse, from winter fuel allowance for old age pensioners being stopped, to allowing mass immigration to increase under his watch, prosecuting innocent White Brits for social media posts, to advocating non existent custodial sentences for child sex offenders and violent offences.
He will be decimated at the ballot box.
I would not trust anything Starmer puts his name to, especially when dealing with Ukraine and Russia. He must be learning disabled to dabble in such affairs so aggressively.
Dumb SOB's is all I can say...... guess they want World War III
no they don't speak for the US.
Europe does not have the resources to fight Russia and win. I can't imagine Europe will put boots on the ground in Ukraine but who knows... I don't imagine the US being there for Europe if they start getting their asses kicked, article 5 or no. The tornado swirls but sitting calmly in its eye is Russia who has said nothing and for who nothing has changed since thr war's inception.
I'm looking forward to it all falling apart, like everything our inept establishment turns its hand to.
The state makes everything worse, it's not like the collective western leaders, sans Trump, are suddenly going to making sensible, rational decisions. They'll mess everything up and then run away into the arms of their wealthy benefactors, leaving new sewer rats to disclaim all responsibility.
They've shown the entire world that they'd rather have war than peace and they won't hesitate to send the country's youth off to be turned into pink mist, and a fair proportion of our weak-minded, gullible population will jump at the chance to go.
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."
I'm not sure I'm old enough to remember a time when they acted in accordance with, or for the benefit of their citizens. Maybe they never did.
This is a globalist’s wet dream. So dystopian. I sure hope we get through.
There is no way Trump will want anything to do with that “deal!” Trump is not a pacifist, but at this point he will want nothing to do with Zelensky-y or Starmer and Macron as his warmongering wingmen. This was all planned and Trump intends to lead when it comes to any agreement. When you write a book called “The Art of the Deal,” there is no way he will let a couple of pea shooters put together a deal where the US provides weapons for another never ending war.
I would hope not, but then Trump surprised many people by inexplicably not vetoing Starmer's giveaway of the Chagos Islands. I can't fathom that.
He hasn't vetoed it YET. He wasn't going to embarrass Starmer in front of the media by saying no way Jose, we ain't accepting your deal, was he? He's a canny operator, keeping his powder dry.
Trump is a spread-sheet kind of a person and cost vs potential value is what he based his Ukraine deal on. Hard to say what the ultimate outcome will be there. I do believe Trump is very serious about Greenland if Denmark isn’t serious about working with him. Especially since Russia is pushing into the Arctic.
The Black Belt Barrister has analysed the White House Zelensky/Trump so-called fracas, as the encounter is portrayed by the bought-and-paid-for MSM, and concludes that Zelensky was to blame: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtmMl8ISPcY.
He is running a poll on his channel (easily accessed via the show notes) asking his viewers if they agree with Starmer’s assertion that Zelensky has “full backing across the United Kingdom”. With 35k votes cast the result was Yes 15%, No 85%.
BBB is awesome. I'm not in agreement. Gbnews running a similar poll, and something like 90% saying no, they are not in support of Ukraine. We don't wish them any harm, obvs, but we have the brains to see where this is leading unlike the clowns in the HOC.