I despise the constant degradation of our language that goes on all around us.
Expressing our distaste for another person’s or culture’s practices is *hatred* and must be outlawed.
Having views that deviate from left wing progressive orthodoxy, which only 5 minutes ago were mainstream moderate conservatism, is “fascist”.
And now misogyny is to become “terrorism”.
No, Cooper, it is nothing of the sort. Terrorism is an act that induces in those experiencing it feelings of terror - think bombs such as the IRA used to terrorise us with or a madman running amok with a knife or gun. Warrington, Dunblane and Southport are examples of terrorism. Don’t devalue what we mean by terrorism by attaching the word to much lesser matters, even if they are unpleasant.
Having chauvinistic attitudes and an irrational dislike of women are pretty unsavoury character traits but terrorism they ain’t. Nor, unless these traits take the holder of them into the arena of harassment or worse, is it something with which the law should be concerned. If the misogyny reaches those levels, as it often does with the trans activists whom Labour MPs seem to love so much, then there adequate legal remedies already available. But somehow I doubt that it this modern day class of misogynist that wants to invade women’s private places and sport that is the sights of Cooper.
Great post. I often wonder if this is just massive brainwashing or social contagion or if it intentional/evil. At least at the higher levels for the latter.
It is so obvious to anyone with a functioning brain that net zero fossil fuels by 2050 coupled with antipathy to nuclear power and “reliance” on expensive, short-lifespan, non-recyclable, heavily resource-depleting, inefficient, unreliable, weather-dependent so-called renewables will lead to economic collapse and mass starvation. I’ve been making the same point for years, most recently in this post: https://metatron.substack.com/p/debunking-the-climate-change-hoax.
I don’t believe they can all be so stupid as to believe their own fake climate change and Net Zero propaganda. I believe they are set on a course of treasonous, deliberate destruction at the behest of their globalist overlords – the UN, Big Money, Big Tech, Big Media, megalomaniac multi-billionaires with unlimited budgets for propaganda and censorship, et al. They are play-actors and inveterate liars embarked upon coldly-premeditated crimes against humanity.
Well that's never going to happen. By extension all governments and all billionaires would be labelled terrorists. No, it's White people that are terrorists or fascists or whatever... because they point out the obvious.
The Green movement will be labelled a terrorist entity once it has served it's usefulness and they start kicking off, as a few have recently, about the industrialisation of the countryside and the toxic detrius of technologies that are 'saving the planet'. I find it interesting to say the least that the system only came down on JSO after years of XR/JSO shenanigans bang on the eve of Herr Starmentroopers coronation. However, it won't be the Malthusian's getting nicked.
I think Cooper's suggestion is irresponsible at best.
As for Mr Packham, I was behind him over the HS2 vanity project (not for the same reasons) but this outburst is beyond the Pale.
Perhaps we should just let these loudmouths have all the rope they want. I trust the common sense of the vast bulk of the British people to see through their nonsense.
HS2 was the wrong answer to the wrong question. Otherwise it was perfect! 🤣 As for Packham, every time I hear him speak I become more convinced he's a few sandwiches short of a picnic.
I think they're concentrating on seeing off Whitey in the West first because they know that is where the main opposition to their dreadful scheme is coming from. They're using the Third World to do it, but ironically, the Third World, where vast numbers live on the edge of starvation and extreme poverty, is eventually going to be hardest hit by the global energy and food rationing agenda.
I despise the constant degradation of our language that goes on all around us.
Expressing our distaste for another person’s or culture’s practices is *hatred* and must be outlawed.
Having views that deviate from left wing progressive orthodoxy, which only 5 minutes ago were mainstream moderate conservatism, is “fascist”.
And now misogyny is to become “terrorism”.
No, Cooper, it is nothing of the sort. Terrorism is an act that induces in those experiencing it feelings of terror - think bombs such as the IRA used to terrorise us with or a madman running amok with a knife or gun. Warrington, Dunblane and Southport are examples of terrorism. Don’t devalue what we mean by terrorism by attaching the word to much lesser matters, even if they are unpleasant.
Having chauvinistic attitudes and an irrational dislike of women are pretty unsavoury character traits but terrorism they ain’t. Nor, unless these traits take the holder of them into the arena of harassment or worse, is it something with which the law should be concerned. If the misogyny reaches those levels, as it often does with the trans activists whom Labour MPs seem to love so much, then there adequate legal remedies already available. But somehow I doubt that it this modern day class of misogynist that wants to invade women’s private places and sport that is the sights of Cooper.
As the dystopian wheel turns…and will we ever be able to stop it in its tracks!
Great post. I often wonder if this is just massive brainwashing or social contagion or if it intentional/evil. At least at the higher levels for the latter.
Bravely published. How long before they deem such heretical thoughts to be a crime? https://dailysceptic.org/2024/08/13/climate-deniers-of-the-world-unite/.
It is so obvious to anyone with a functioning brain that net zero fossil fuels by 2050 coupled with antipathy to nuclear power and “reliance” on expensive, short-lifespan, non-recyclable, heavily resource-depleting, inefficient, unreliable, weather-dependent so-called renewables will lead to economic collapse and mass starvation. I’ve been making the same point for years, most recently in this post: https://metatron.substack.com/p/debunking-the-climate-change-hoax.
I don’t believe they can all be so stupid as to believe their own fake climate change and Net Zero propaganda. I believe they are set on a course of treasonous, deliberate destruction at the behest of their globalist overlords – the UN, Big Money, Big Tech, Big Media, megalomaniac multi-billionaires with unlimited budgets for propaganda and censorship, et al. They are play-actors and inveterate liars embarked upon coldly-premeditated crimes against humanity.
It’s not just the climate change hoax, it’s all the other oppressions they have been heaping on us in recent years: https://metatron.substack.com/p/my-heretical-epitaph.
Well that's never going to happen. By extension all governments and all billionaires would be labelled terrorists. No, it's White people that are terrorists or fascists or whatever... because they point out the obvious.
The Green movement will be labelled a terrorist entity once it has served it's usefulness and they start kicking off, as a few have recently, about the industrialisation of the countryside and the toxic detrius of technologies that are 'saving the planet'. I find it interesting to say the least that the system only came down on JSO after years of XR/JSO shenanigans bang on the eve of Herr Starmentroopers coronation. However, it won't be the Malthusian's getting nicked.
I think Cooper's suggestion is irresponsible at best.
As for Mr Packham, I was behind him over the HS2 vanity project (not for the same reasons) but this outburst is beyond the Pale.
Perhaps we should just let these loudmouths have all the rope they want. I trust the common sense of the vast bulk of the British people to see through their nonsense.
HS2 was the wrong answer to the wrong question. Otherwise it was perfect! 🤣 As for Packham, every time I hear him speak I become more convinced he's a few sandwiches short of a picnic.
I think that could be very well advised! So tired of these players determined to edge the human race to destruction.
Agreed.
They only seem to be pushing the Caucasians off the edge though.
If that is in my future, then I need to work out how to drag some of those bastards off the edge with me.
I think they're concentrating on seeing off Whitey in the West first because they know that is where the main opposition to their dreadful scheme is coming from. They're using the Third World to do it, but ironically, the Third World, where vast numbers live on the edge of starvation and extreme poverty, is eventually going to be hardest hit by the global energy and food rationing agenda.