You have to read it to believe it. Even NNZ teachers are shocked by a draft science curriculum which has no mention of the core science subjects of physics, chemistry and biology. Apparently some New Zealand officials are toying with a whole new science curriculum which sounds like a return to the stone age. All the hard stuff about electromagnetism, elements, mass, motion, and molecular bonding has been replaced with UN Agenda 21 items like climate change and biodiversity.
It seems to me NZ and Australia both are practice fields to see how far the absurd pendulum can swing, how far till people professors, students fight back. Education goes woke with gender equity climate catastrophes. It’s always the THE agenda.
Utterly transparent as to their true agenda: an easily controlled population. Would seem after Covid they already accomplished this, but a few intelligent and educated people could turn this around, can’t risk it, can they?
"First they came for language, arts and history, then they came for biology, now they want the STEM courses." Well-spoken. I hadn't thought of it in this way before.
As you say, you have to read it to believe it. I still swither on deciding whether these people are mad or bad. The former applies if they have swallowed their own fake propaganda and are unconsciously behaving totally irrationally. The latter applies if they know the agenda is totally fraudulent but are playing along to satisfy the ulterior motives of their globalist overlords.
My default assumption is that they are bad. However, we have seen so much “madness” in recent years, including among the general public, that I still wonder.
Andrew Montford of the GWPF has just sponsored the book “Climate Catastrophism and the Cult of Culture” by a US psychologist which claims to prove that climate catastrophism has become a secular religion. The author says this is very dangerous because such cultures work through subconscious behaviours and so are entirely irrational. They can lead to the building of great civilisations, but also to their complete and utter collapse [as could happen in NZ if these mad nutters or bad (meaning malign) actors get their way].
I didn’t say directly what he was guilty of and he didn’t reply. Giving him the benefit of the doubt, the most favourable interpretation is that he is “mad” and was acting (mostly by passive omission) as an ignorant “useful idiot” to further the establishment’s criminal Covid plandemic narrative.
In contrast, people like Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock and all the other WEF puppets all round the world must have been fully briefed to know that the whole thing was a sham and therefore what they were doing was “bad”. The same applies on the climate change sham.
It seems to me NZ and Australia both are practice fields to see how far the absurd pendulum can swing, how far till people professors, students fight back. Education goes woke with gender equity climate catastrophes. It’s always the THE agenda.
Just let’s see how far we can get away with.
Follow the science, bc we are science.
No chemistry, no physics, no thermodynamics, no biology, they're training "climate scientists"!
LOL
Utterly transparent as to their true agenda: an easily controlled population. Would seem after Covid they already accomplished this, but a few intelligent and educated people could turn this around, can’t risk it, can they?
Your lead in killed me. Hilarious! Thanks for making me smile today.
If you're going to slaughter the spring lambs anyway it doesn't make sense to waste a lot of effort on teaching them anything....
"First they came for language, arts and history, then they came for biology, now they want the STEM courses." Well-spoken. I hadn't thought of it in this way before.
As you say, you have to read it to believe it. I still swither on deciding whether these people are mad or bad. The former applies if they have swallowed their own fake propaganda and are unconsciously behaving totally irrationally. The latter applies if they know the agenda is totally fraudulent but are playing along to satisfy the ulterior motives of their globalist overlords.
My default assumption is that they are bad. However, we have seen so much “madness” in recent years, including among the general public, that I still wonder.
Andrew Montford of the GWPF has just sponsored the book “Climate Catastrophism and the Cult of Culture” by a US psychologist which claims to prove that climate catastrophism has become a secular religion. The author says this is very dangerous because such cultures work through subconscious behaviours and so are entirely irrational. They can lead to the building of great civilisations, but also to their complete and utter collapse [as could happen in NZ if these mad nutters or bad (meaning malign) actors get their way].
It's quite a long book so I doubt I’ll get round to reading it unless things get really desperate. Maybe someone will do a precis. See https://mailchi.mp/thegwpf/new-book-climate-catastrophism-and-the-grip-of-culture-197175?e=69a42f046a.
" I still swither on deciding whether these people are mad or bad."
Don't bother your head with it, they're clearly both.
But it does make a difference. Almost a year ago I accused my MP of being guilty by commission or omission, see https://metatron.substack.com/p/an-open-letter-to-my-mp-culpable?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email.
I didn’t say directly what he was guilty of and he didn’t reply. Giving him the benefit of the doubt, the most favourable interpretation is that he is “mad” and was acting (mostly by passive omission) as an ignorant “useful idiot” to further the establishment’s criminal Covid plandemic narrative.
In contrast, people like Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock and all the other WEF puppets all round the world must have been fully briefed to know that the whole thing was a sham and therefore what they were doing was “bad”. The same applies on the climate change sham.