Hansen, along with co-authors, has released a new study just ahead of COP 28 which basically claims ‘man-made climate change is much worse than we thought’. He derives a new, far higher estimate of climate sensitivity to doubling of atmospheric CO2 of 4.8C by re-examining paleoclimate data and furthermore claims that a reduction in man-made aerosol emissions - notably the recent near elimination of sulphates from ship diesel fuel - is driving a very recent ‘spurt’ in global warming which will mean that we pass the 1.5C ‘OMG we’re all going to DIE!’ threshold much sooner than previously expected.
The false Climate vs. weather dichotomy has always been keystone of the failed Global Warming (aka "Change") cult.
If you can't reliably model and calculate small numbers like the weather trends 2 or 4 or 20 days from now, you can never calculate the large numbers or predict trends 2 or 4 or 20 decades from now.
If your model only gets 2+2=4 less than 5 % of the time adding exponentially more digits and operators won't improve your accuracy.
There is one scientific exponential law underlying this mess.
Parkinson's law: BUREAUCRACIES GROW.
The only goal of a bureaucracy is to increase its budget and authority exponentially. Fake panic is a time-tested growth hormone for budget and power. Redefining words and numbers is another hormone. If the current numbers aren't making enough panic, change the equations and multipliers, or change the test threshold, until you get enough panic. Works every time.
It’s good that at least some of the usual suspects are acknowledging the (short-term) climate-impacting reality of Hunga-Tonga. That will help to force the corrupt Met Office to admit their cover-up.
Hunga Tonga, people. Hunga Tonga.
"you can’t expect them to do simple arithmetic can you?"
No.
It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it. - Upton Sinclair
The false Climate vs. weather dichotomy has always been keystone of the failed Global Warming (aka "Change") cult.
If you can't reliably model and calculate small numbers like the weather trends 2 or 4 or 20 days from now, you can never calculate the large numbers or predict trends 2 or 4 or 20 decades from now.
If your model only gets 2+2=4 less than 5 % of the time adding exponentially more digits and operators won't improve your accuracy.
Hansen is a loony soy-boy. I believe it isn’t the cows but soy-boys like Gates and Hansen increasing greenhouse gasses. Their geoengineering strategies are bizarre and more likely to be our undoing. https://www.newsweek.com/james-hansens-new-climate-warning-controversial-plan-cool-planet-1840385
There is one scientific exponential law underlying this mess.
Parkinson's law: BUREAUCRACIES GROW.
The only goal of a bureaucracy is to increase its budget and authority exponentially. Fake panic is a time-tested growth hormone for budget and power. Redefining words and numbers is another hormone. If the current numbers aren't making enough panic, change the equations and multipliers, or change the test threshold, until you get enough panic. Works every time.
🎯🎯🎯
It’s good that at least some of the usual suspects are acknowledging the (short-term) climate-impacting reality of Hunga-Tonga. That will help to force the corrupt Met Office to admit their cover-up.
I doubt it, they're too far gone.
Maybe he can join Mann and Attenborough and shove Mann's "hockey stick" up their collective arses.
I’d like to see the chart on that. Velocity vs length.
🤣🤣🤣🤣👊🏻👍🏻👏🏻