It’s a crime in itself: the denial of biology and reality in order to pander to Woke ideology and record serious violent offences committed by biological males as female crimes.
It’s bad in Australia, they are having a human rights enquiry into women’s rights, but here’s the thing in 2012 our then prime minister Julia Gillard removed the word women from the sex discrimination act. Real women are excluded- the only submissions will be from transgender and transgender lobbyists.
Isn’t the fundamental issue simply the conflation of gender (effectively personality) with biological sex? Why can’t we use male and female? E.g. crime was committed by a male. Perhaps we could even say, crime was committed by a male that identifies as a woman if we need a compromise. Either way a relevant question is why does gender take precedent over biological sex when reporting crimes? You could argue I suppose that the reporting could just say a person. Anyways, it’s deliberate which should perhaps be the bigger concern. Who’s pushing this and for what purpose?
To my way of thinking, the first question to ask is, was this person not only 'identifying' as a woman at the time of the crimes, but officially living in that role as well? That seems highly unlikely. So it seems probable that the crimes were committed by a man who was subsequently 'identifying' as female when he was brought in for questioning. Having said that, EVEN if this person was legitimately recognised in his chosen gender at the time of the murder, by committing a violent crime overwhelmingly attributable to those sharing his biological sex at birth, he automatically forfeited the right to be recorded as female on the charge sheet, and society has NO right to record his sex as female on the charge sheet.
“A spokesman for the force told The Telegraph: “We are required to record the gender of individuals when they are brought into our custody.”
This statement isn’t true. If they believe it’s true that is also deeply concerning.
The law which has encouraged much of the gender nonsense is a disgrace, but nowhere does it require what TV Police state it requires. They are in bed with Stonewall to promote a change in the law to make self ID rather than possession of an absurd GRC the basis for being treated as the sex which one is not. And that law is not absolute but has plenty of exceptions, although no doubt the Stonewall Alliance would remove them too.
It is not for the Police to be part of any campaign to change the law; their job is to enforce the existing law uniformly and without prejudice. Once this didn’t need saying; today it is a distant dream.
This is insanity. We are witnessing the breakdown of society occurring right before our eyes. There is a widespread mental health crisis and it's only being amplified by political policies, the media and the pharmaceutical industry. The plague of loneliness and isolation sure doesn't help matters either. This is a spiritual crisis.
When reason is shunned by society there are no more boundaries to irrationality! Cultural Marxism is only one of many avenues used sanction irrational behavior. Reason is the bond which strengthens society and irrationality is it’s destroyer.
All of this obvious Madness is fruit from the same poison tree. It's well past time to cut that tree down, dig up the roots, and salt the Earth where it stood.
Someone does my cat that way gets the potato peeler. Don't care how they identify
It’s bad in Australia, they are having a human rights enquiry into women’s rights, but here’s the thing in 2012 our then prime minister Julia Gillard removed the word women from the sex discrimination act. Real women are excluded- the only submissions will be from transgender and transgender lobbyists.
Unreal.
Isn’t the fundamental issue simply the conflation of gender (effectively personality) with biological sex? Why can’t we use male and female? E.g. crime was committed by a male. Perhaps we could even say, crime was committed by a male that identifies as a woman if we need a compromise. Either way a relevant question is why does gender take precedent over biological sex when reporting crimes? You could argue I suppose that the reporting could just say a person. Anyways, it’s deliberate which should perhaps be the bigger concern. Who’s pushing this and for what purpose?
To my way of thinking, the first question to ask is, was this person not only 'identifying' as a woman at the time of the crimes, but officially living in that role as well? That seems highly unlikely. So it seems probable that the crimes were committed by a man who was subsequently 'identifying' as female when he was brought in for questioning. Having said that, EVEN if this person was legitimately recognised in his chosen gender at the time of the murder, by committing a violent crime overwhelmingly attributable to those sharing his biological sex at birth, he automatically forfeited the right to be recorded as female on the charge sheet, and society has NO right to record his sex as female on the charge sheet.
Pure vermin.
And, I imagine, when he identifies as innocent, they’ll drop all charges
“A spokesman for the force told The Telegraph: “We are required to record the gender of individuals when they are brought into our custody.”
This statement isn’t true. If they believe it’s true that is also deeply concerning.
The law which has encouraged much of the gender nonsense is a disgrace, but nowhere does it require what TV Police state it requires. They are in bed with Stonewall to promote a change in the law to make self ID rather than possession of an absurd GRC the basis for being treated as the sex which one is not. And that law is not absolute but has plenty of exceptions, although no doubt the Stonewall Alliance would remove them too.
It is not for the Police to be part of any campaign to change the law; their job is to enforce the existing law uniformly and without prejudice. Once this didn’t need saying; today it is a distant dream.
This is insanity. We are witnessing the breakdown of society occurring right before our eyes. There is a widespread mental health crisis and it's only being amplified by political policies, the media and the pharmaceutical industry. The plague of loneliness and isolation sure doesn't help matters either. This is a spiritual crisis.
When reason is shunned by society there are no more boundaries to irrationality! Cultural Marxism is only one of many avenues used sanction irrational behavior. Reason is the bond which strengthens society and irrationality is it’s destroyer.
All of this obvious Madness is fruit from the same poison tree. It's well past time to cut that tree down, dig up the roots, and salt the Earth where it stood.