Ryan Maue, meteorologist, on X:
What could be causing this?
The most obvious explanation: Hunga Tonga affecting global circulation. I mean, it’s not like I wasn’t pointing this out 13 months ago:
Finally, we might expect to see changes in atmospheric circulation. So apart from generalised warming, extreme weather may become slightly more extreme in response to changing jet stream patterns. This has implications for rainfall, hot summers and possible severe winters.
Looks like extreme weather hurricanes in the tropical north Atlantic got a whole lot less extreme! Ryan Maue was previously insisting that the exceptional global warming spike in 2023 was due to the nascent El Nino at that time. He is now of the opinion that it is likely Hunga Tonga which has impacted the Brewer-Dobson circulation and Intertropical Convergence Zone, resulting in the highly unusual circulation pattern in the tropical Atlantic. A volcano which can do that is also the most likely culprit to explain most or all of the sudden global warming which we witnessed starting summer 2023, in my humble opinion. But the definitive science eludes the ‘experts’ still:
There is some suggestion that a sudden increase in solar insolation into the oceans (due to a decrease in cloud cover) drove the remarkable increase in Atlantic ocean surface temperatures which we witnessed beginning spring 2023, and which is almost certainly connected to the more general global warming starting summer 2023. Some scientists tried to blame that warming on the disappearance of so called ‘ship tracks’ due to 2020 legislation limiting the amount of sulphur allowed in marine fuels - but that explanation didn’t hold water. In answer as to what may have caused the sudden increase in solar insolation, I suggest that, with reference to Ryan Maue’s reply to the Saharan Dust tweet, regional decreases in tropical and extratropical cloud cover may be “a symptom or proxy of larger circulation change”. Which brings us right back to Hunga Tonga.
Hunga Tonga, the gift that keeps on giving! More popcorn please. Good on Ryan Maue for publicly conceding the impact of Hunga Tonga although he sounds a bit desperate because in a later post he also blames “weird effects of pandemic shutting down industry + pollution”.
The thread on X brings to light good guy John Shewchuk (@_ClimateCraze): https://x.com/_ClimateCraze/status/1830414913304490127.
His X home page (or whatever it’s called) has an intriguing HungaTongaMeter post by Javier Vinós: https://x.com/JVinos_Climate/status/1830505246050668877.
Further down he has a great post with graph showing how the warming effect of CO2 is saturated, meaning that “further CO2 warming is so tiny it is not tangible -- it's irrelevant. It is so tiny, that the media is afraid to say how tiny”: https://x.com/_ClimateCraze/status/1830402252059660517.
Anyone who's seen the satellite photos of the Hunga Tonga eruption could tell that it was going to be a big deal!
Climatologists are fraudsters -- not scientists. That's why they're always "shocked, amazed, or baffled" every single time a natural event causes a climate impact.
It's so transparent that these people are propagandists. How do they think weather patterns changed before the industrial age? There have been ice ages and warming periods LONG before man was producing anything, and yet, they're still "shocked and amazed."
Also, the La Nina pattern always results in less serious storms for the Atlantic. The pacific is warmer during La Nina and the Atlantic is colder. I've witnessed this -- in my lifetime. I live in Florida.
Even without the Hunga Tonga eruption, the Atlantic was going to see less storms that hit land. When they do pop up, they usually spin north, way out in the ocean nowhere near land.
I think that's why they are trying to hype up the "number of named storms." Because there's always the possibility there might be more named storms, but they're likely to have less of an impact on large population centers.
It seems the Climate Hoax is starting to unravel. I also think the "scientists" who profit(ed) most from Climate Change fraud were so adamant about climate legislation in 2023 -- because even without the Hunga Tonga eruption, La Nina was going to cause less eventful storms in the Atlantic, just as I predicted.
What amazes me is the number of times these people "cry wolf" -- and others were still falling for it. I think the younger generation is going to do better about not believing propaganda, because they're in the middle of things being exposed.
Even in the non-doctored clip Greta Thunburg admitted that world leaders aren't doing enough to treat climate issues as a "crisis."
https://www.ibtimes.sg/fact-check-greta-thunberg-admits-climate-change-hoax-says-climate-change-does-not-exist-58383
***
Debunking the claims being made by the clip, USA Today said that viral video was altered to change the meaning of Thunberg's sentence.
In the original video, Thunberg while speaking about Biden said, "I would just tell him to tell the situation as it is. Because, I mean, yes, you could say – I meet with a lot of world leaders and they say, 'I can't do anything because I don't have the support from voters.' Well, how can you expect support and pressure from voters if you aren't treating the crisis like a crisis? Since the climate crisis doesn't exist, how can we expect people to want climate action?"
Let's just hope people keep seeing all the "science" fraud all around us.
***
If Climate Change was a "crisis" people would know by now. But every prediction has fallen through -- every single time. That's why things are shifting to "viruses are going to kill us all!"
Remember that World Economic Forum video, going on about how great the pandemic was -- because there were less people out and about? Perhaps not, because they pulled it from old Twitter quickly.
https://ogre.substack.com/p/the-world-economic-forum
Pandemics are the next big hoax.
The proposed solutions for pandemics will result in the same kinds of outcomes that Climate Change legislation would have brought about. Less people moving about, traveling.
Most importantly less freedom.