Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas Brodie's avatar

Hunga Tonga, the gift that keeps on giving! More popcorn please. Good on Ryan Maue for publicly conceding the impact of Hunga Tonga although he sounds a bit desperate because in a later post he also blames “weird effects of pandemic shutting down industry + pollution”.

The thread on X brings to light good guy John Shewchuk (@_ClimateCraze): https://x.com/_ClimateCraze/status/1830414913304490127.

His X home page (or whatever it’s called) has an intriguing HungaTongaMeter post by Javier Vinós: https://x.com/JVinos_Climate/status/1830505246050668877.

Further down he has a great post with graph showing how the warming effect of CO2 is saturated, meaning that “further CO2 warming is so tiny it is not tangible -- it's irrelevant. It is so tiny, that the media is afraid to say how tiny”: https://x.com/_ClimateCraze/status/1830402252059660517.

Expand full comment
OGRE's avatar
Sep 2Edited

Anyone who's seen the satellite photos of the Hunga Tonga eruption could tell that it was going to be a big deal!

Climatologists are fraudsters -- not scientists. That's why they're always "shocked, amazed, or baffled" every single time a natural event causes a climate impact.

It's so transparent that these people are propagandists. How do they think weather patterns changed before the industrial age? There have been ice ages and warming periods LONG before man was producing anything, and yet, they're still "shocked and amazed."

Also, the La Nina pattern always results in less serious storms for the Atlantic. The pacific is warmer during La Nina and the Atlantic is colder. I've witnessed this -- in my lifetime. I live in Florida.

Even without the Hunga Tonga eruption, the Atlantic was going to see less storms that hit land. When they do pop up, they usually spin north, way out in the ocean nowhere near land.

I think that's why they are trying to hype up the "number of named storms." Because there's always the possibility there might be more named storms, but they're likely to have less of an impact on large population centers.

It seems the Climate Hoax is starting to unravel. I also think the "scientists" who profit(ed) most from Climate Change fraud were so adamant about climate legislation in 2023 -- because even without the Hunga Tonga eruption, La Nina was going to cause less eventful storms in the Atlantic, just as I predicted.

What amazes me is the number of times these people "cry wolf" -- and others were still falling for it. I think the younger generation is going to do better about not believing propaganda, because they're in the middle of things being exposed.

Even in the non-doctored clip Greta Thunburg admitted that world leaders aren't doing enough to treat climate issues as a "crisis."

https://www.ibtimes.sg/fact-check-greta-thunberg-admits-climate-change-hoax-says-climate-change-does-not-exist-58383

***

Debunking the claims being made by the clip, USA Today said that viral video was altered to change the meaning of Thunberg's sentence.

In the original video, Thunberg while speaking about Biden said, "I would just tell him to tell the situation as it is. Because, I mean, yes, you could say – I meet with a lot of world leaders and they say, 'I can't do anything because I don't have the support from voters.' Well, how can you expect support and pressure from voters if you aren't treating the crisis like a crisis? Since the climate crisis doesn't exist, how can we expect people to want climate action?"

Let's just hope people keep seeing all the "science" fraud all around us.

***

If Climate Change was a "crisis" people would know by now. But every prediction has fallen through -- every single time. That's why things are shifting to "viruses are going to kill us all!"

Remember that World Economic Forum video, going on about how great the pandemic was -- because there were less people out and about? Perhaps not, because they pulled it from old Twitter quickly.

https://ogre.substack.com/p/the-world-economic-forum

Pandemics are the next big hoax.

The proposed solutions for pandemics will result in the same kinds of outcomes that Climate Change legislation would have brought about. Less people moving about, traveling.

Most importantly less freedom.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts