The BBC is leading the Charge of the Global Warming Bullshit Brigade as usual: Do those women look particularly heat-stressed to you? They don’t to me. The woman in the centre does look a bit pissed off that someone is pointing a camera at her though! Is this the best the BBC could do to depict the depth of human suffering on our hottest day ever?
Nobody knows how significant it will become. What is clear from the graph is that apart from the massive 2015-16 El Nino, cooling La Ninas have predominated since 2004. This is also shown by the ENSO Multivariate Index. In fact, it shows a preponderance of cooling La Ninas since 1998 and before that a preponderance of warming El Ninos going back to 1980: https://psl.noaa.gov/enso/mei/
A slightly out of date graph going back to 1950 shows a preponderance of cooling La Ninas which in the 1970s caused “experts” to fear the onset of a new ice age: http://climexp.knmi.nl/data/imei.png.
Man-made CO2 has nothing to do with any of these natural cyclical changes.
I've also added it in the post. They're only predicting a weak to moderate El Nino at present, so the effect upon global temperatures will be modest; certainly nothing like 2016.
I am convinced that NASA's real mission in the 1960s was to learn how to "control the weather" to "control the world" as stated by LBJ in 1962 and then lie to 'the people" about "climate change."
Of course they have pretty ladies for the picture. But the Yanktze river dried up last year for God's sake, affecting hydroelectric power and the economy of the whole world.
And by pcr logic, record hot days are counted since 2001. Anything before then is not counted because most bloggers/ influencers/ journalists are under 30.
I note from Paul Homewood's site that the temperature is derived from a combination of global satellite data and historical tree ring analysis.
I assume the "historical tree ring analysis" in question is that used by the egregious Michael Mann to create his bogus Hokey Schtick!
"Hide the Decline"!
And that's leaving aside the question of the validity of splicing satellite data with historic tree rings!
I think the original source of this absurd claim was in the Washington Post. It's pure propaganda.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/07/05/hottest-day-ever-recorded/
So far the El Nino only shows as a tiny blip in the most important Nino 3.4 graph to May 2023: https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/CDB/Tropics/figt5.gif
Nobody knows how significant it will become. What is clear from the graph is that apart from the massive 2015-16 El Nino, cooling La Ninas have predominated since 2004. This is also shown by the ENSO Multivariate Index. In fact, it shows a preponderance of cooling La Ninas since 1998 and before that a preponderance of warming El Ninos going back to 1980: https://psl.noaa.gov/enso/mei/
A slightly out of date graph going back to 1950 shows a preponderance of cooling La Ninas which in the 1970s caused “experts” to fear the onset of a new ice age: http://climexp.knmi.nl/data/imei.png.
Man-made CO2 has nothing to do with any of these natural cyclical changes.
The model forecast plume of current El Nino predictions is here:
https://ensoforecast.iri.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/sst_table_img?month=5&year=2023
I've also added it in the post. They're only predicting a weak to moderate El Nino at present, so the effect upon global temperatures will be modest; certainly nothing like 2016.
I am convinced that NASA's real mission in the 1960s was to learn how to "control the weather" to "control the world" as stated by LBJ in 1962 and then lie to 'the people" about "climate change."
Maybe the journalist who took the picture really adores Asian women and confused the word hottest with temperature rather than attractiveness.
It's highly likely.
Of course they have pretty ladies for the picture. But the Yanktze river dried up last year for God's sake, affecting hydroelectric power and the economy of the whole world.
The Seine dried up in 1540 and there was a lot less water extraction for human use in those days.
But no such commentary from BBC on similar positive trending graphs of actual excess deaths across the vaxxed world since 2021.....
Of course not, but from now on, if you die within 28 days of a heatwave or a 'record hot day' you will be classed as a climate crisis death.
And by pcr logic, record hot days are counted since 2001. Anything before then is not counted because most bloggers/ influencers/ journalists are under 30.
Such obvious horseshite and yet Covid showed just how many people lack critical thinking skills and have joined the sheeple brigade.
We're going to soon see if those same people fall for the 'run for the hills, it's the deadly climate crisis' bullshit.
Even money.