World Weather Attribution and Imperial College London just keep them coming: the ‘scientific’ studies which purport to demonstrate that man-made climate change is the cause of bad weather occurring across the world. Floods in China, storms in Florida, heatwaves in South America, wildfires in Australia and the western US, now droughts in Africa - it’s all your bloody fault for selfishly using a car and keeping warm in winter using gas or oil-fired central heating, and eating meat, and drinking milk, and all the other reckless, planet-destroying stuff which you do day after day on account of living normally and not like some hermit in a cave.
It happens time and time again; reducing incredibly complex systems dependent on dozens, maybe hundreds or even thousands of variables to just one; man made climate change and thus CO2. We see the same illiterate analysis in the discussions relating to gender, race and whatever greviances people have these days.
Well done for your forensic debunking of the climate propogandists so that we don’t have to.
I've given up hoping that "logic will prevail" on the climate change “debate”. I’m convinced that our politicians know full well (they can’t all be THAT stupid) that they are complicit in what I assert are climate change/Net Zero crimes against humanity, just as they have been with their blatantly obvious Covid crimes against humanity, but they will never admit it.
Forensic legal challenges are probably the only hope.
If science survives the attempt to totally corrupt it, we will need a record of how that attempt at corruption was carried out, and by whom. History will then be the judge.
"... the authors completely ignore them in order to concentrate on just one factor which they attribute to human-caused climate change - temperature"
I understand that this is the modus operandi of 'brave new science', whether of climate change or of biomedicine :- the conclusions don't necessarily reflect the study findings. This is necessary as more funding can be obtained only by getting the right answers and the people who supply the grants only read the 'executive summary'.
If anyone is on Twitter, I would appreciate a link to this article in reply to Fredi Otto's tweet here:
https://twitter.com/FrediOtto/status/1651477810832080896
Of course, this never happened before global warming, so there was no need for Live Aid in the 80s then?
It happens time and time again; reducing incredibly complex systems dependent on dozens, maybe hundreds or even thousands of variables to just one; man made climate change and thus CO2. We see the same illiterate analysis in the discussions relating to gender, race and whatever greviances people have these days.
Well done on doing the research👍
Well, in a way they may be right. The Geoeingeering that is being perpetrated in every country is the cause.
Thanks Jaime, that must have been painful. This paper really takes the biscuit for peak gobbledegook
Well done for your forensic debunking of the climate propogandists so that we don’t have to.
I've given up hoping that "logic will prevail" on the climate change “debate”. I’m convinced that our politicians know full well (they can’t all be THAT stupid) that they are complicit in what I assert are climate change/Net Zero crimes against humanity, just as they have been with their blatantly obvious Covid crimes against humanity, but they will never admit it.
Forensic legal challenges are probably the only hope.
If science survives the attempt to totally corrupt it, we will need a record of how that attempt at corruption was carried out, and by whom. History will then be the judge.
More X-Box science from "Pantsdown" Ferguson and his sad bunch of AGW scammers...
Why on Earth anyone is taking any notice of these charlatans with their unparalleled record of disastrous failures is anybody's guess!
Haha. I don't think Pantsdown had a personal hand in this one but it does seem that Imperial is the home of junk alarmist 'science'.
"... the authors completely ignore them in order to concentrate on just one factor which they attribute to human-caused climate change - temperature"
I understand that this is the modus operandi of 'brave new science', whether of climate change or of biomedicine :- the conclusions don't necessarily reflect the study findings. This is necessary as more funding can be obtained only by getting the right answers and the people who supply the grants only read the 'executive summary'.
The climate scam takes the handoff from the Covid scam.