This video on Youtube has come to my attention. Watch the first few minutes. Three guys walking alongside a highway near Lahaina, towards a burned out car by the side of the road. The guy with the shades says, “What you are going to see will break science.” Well, here it is. Apparently, this burned out car cannot be explained by science as we know it, Jim.
I'm resisting the use of such language, because that was precisely what Normies used to call those people warning us of the emergence of the New World Order, UN Agenda 21, the depopulation agenda, creation of 15 minute cities and the 'clearances' of farmland and wild areas etc., all of which is now coming to pass, so the 'Tinfoil hatters' were right all along. I do think however that the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction and the confirmation of former 'conspiracy theories' as real has now spawned a new round of wild speculation which is rapidly getting out of control.
The existence of energy weapons and their capabilities are well documented, and their capability of causing the type of damage claimed in Maui is non-existent as is evident to anyone with even the most rudimentary understanding of the physics involved.
Aside from anything else, the beams from them are very narrow, designed as they are designed to burn holes in their target.
As it happens, in the 1970s I was peripherally involved in the use of subsonics in he automotive industry to reduce audio noise levels so cars could be made of beer can tinplate and still maintain a degree of silence, as opposed to having to big, heavy and using sound deadening material.
This involved altering the frequency of the sounds below audible level, unfortunately there were serious effects on the occupants, ranging from loss of concentration - linked to multiple pileups on motorways in the early 1970s to nausea and headaches.
The sound levels of Concorde were "tuned" out of the dba frequency spectrum to pass US SPL level regulations, incidentally.
It would be great to have a meta-analysis of all proposed present-day conspiracies, in order to determine which ones are most likely to be true and logical (based on evidence beyond a reasonable doubt) and which ones are wildly speculative.
I've no idea. I'd never even heard of Directed Energy Weapons before Lahaina, but apparently they are real and have been used. But were they used in Lahaina to ignite the fires and selectively burn certain areas/buildings. but not others? Were they used to melt random cars beside the highway two miles outside of town?
TPTB are perfectly happy with this continuous flow of conjecture. In fact, they probably feed into it. They need the distractions. This fire was a weird weather event. Oswald shot Kennedy. The vaccine is safe and effective. There is an overarching, Grand Theory here. But we are afraid to face it.
The Grauniad article says "However, a “tiny window” of opportunity remained open to tackle the climate crisis, they said, with humanity having all the tools needed."
Funny how there's always a tiny window of opportunity. Repent now of your sins and ye shall be saved. I'll go for the risk of the fires of Hell rather than be burned alive to save my soul, thank you very much.
As to the tools we need - they seem to be mass depopulation followed by ... more mass depopulation. Funny how the cure usually turns out to be the same as the disease.
For your consideration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bs3o3z0G8tw&t=13s&pp=2AENkAIB
What’s this obsession with Direct Energy Weapons?
Tin Foil Hatter nonsense.
I'm resisting the use of such language, because that was precisely what Normies used to call those people warning us of the emergence of the New World Order, UN Agenda 21, the depopulation agenda, creation of 15 minute cities and the 'clearances' of farmland and wild areas etc., all of which is now coming to pass, so the 'Tinfoil hatters' were right all along. I do think however that the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction and the confirmation of former 'conspiracy theories' as real has now spawned a new round of wild speculation which is rapidly getting out of control.
The existence of energy weapons and their capabilities are well documented, and their capability of causing the type of damage claimed in Maui is non-existent as is evident to anyone with even the most rudimentary understanding of the physics involved.
Aside from anything else, the beams from them are very narrow, designed as they are designed to burn holes in their target.
See here:
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/raytheon-technologies-delivers-fourth-combat-ready-laser-weapon-to-us-air-force-301847834.html#:~:text=%22Anywhere%20the%20Air%20Force%20sees,Energy%20Lasers%20at%20Raytheon%20Technologies.
https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2023/3/21/israeli-made-high-energy-laser-makes-debut
Neither of these state-of-the-art devices is designed for nor capable of causing the type of damage in Maui claimed by the catastrophists.
There have been tests of focussed acoustic beams for antipersonnel purposes but nothing AFAIK is in use.
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/accoustic.htm
https://www.jstor.org/stable/45354955
As it happens, in the 1970s I was peripherally involved in the use of subsonics in he automotive industry to reduce audio noise levels so cars could be made of beer can tinplate and still maintain a degree of silence, as opposed to having to big, heavy and using sound deadening material.
This involved altering the frequency of the sounds below audible level, unfortunately there were serious effects on the occupants, ranging from loss of concentration - linked to multiple pileups on motorways in the early 1970s to nausea and headaches.
The sound levels of Concorde were "tuned" out of the dba frequency spectrum to pass US SPL level regulations, incidentally.
It would be great to have a meta-analysis of all proposed present-day conspiracies, in order to determine which ones are most likely to be true and logical (based on evidence beyond a reasonable doubt) and which ones are wildly speculative.
I've no idea. I'd never even heard of Directed Energy Weapons before Lahaina, but apparently they are real and have been used. But were they used in Lahaina to ignite the fires and selectively burn certain areas/buildings. but not others? Were they used to melt random cars beside the highway two miles outside of town?
BTW, electric car fires burn far longer, and up to three times hotter, so they can actualy melt the steel. (Thanks for the post)
"but apparently they are real and have been used"
They're called "lasers", are used for missile defence and research is still in its infancy.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defence-and-security-accelerator-dasa-open-call-for-innovation/ifa035-making-science-fiction-a-reality-future-directed-energy-weapons#:~:text=Directed%20Energy%20Weapons%20(DEW)%20are,effects%20on%20equipment%20or%20facilities.
Fear porn. Period
TPTB are perfectly happy with this continuous flow of conjecture. In fact, they probably feed into it. They need the distractions. This fire was a weird weather event. Oswald shot Kennedy. The vaccine is safe and effective. There is an overarching, Grand Theory here. But we are afraid to face it.
It seems that science today has become much easier to break.
Looks like we've broken the climate too. Oh dear.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/aug/28/crazy-off-the-charts-records-has-humanity-finally-broken-the-climate
The Grauniad article says "However, a “tiny window” of opportunity remained open to tackle the climate crisis, they said, with humanity having all the tools needed."
Funny how there's always a tiny window of opportunity. Repent now of your sins and ye shall be saved. I'll go for the risk of the fires of Hell rather than be burned alive to save my soul, thank you very much.
As to the tools we need - they seem to be mass depopulation followed by ... more mass depopulation. Funny how the cure usually turns out to be the same as the disease.
One tiny window of opportunity for mankind, one giant leap for globalist elites.
Jaime, This interview is probably worth your attention. Catherine covers the land-grab aspects of these fires.
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/catherine-austin-fitts-explains-the?r=g6u5j&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web