h/t Mark Hodgson Predictably, the Imperial College London pseudoscientific outfit, World Weather Attribution (WWA), have rushed out an extreme weather attribution re. the very wet weather which affected Great Britain between October 2023 and March 2024.
I won't answer for headlines which always, whatever they are about, are sensationalised; for clicks, to sell ads and to make money for their shareholders and yes according to this study storminess is less likely - but that doesn't alter the fact of anthropogenic global warming.
Nor does it mean that net zero is a disgrace. Though it is a scam to postpone climate action to an indefinite point in the future.
GHE theory fails because of two erroneous assumptions: 1. near Earth space is cold & w/o GHE would become 255 K, -18 C, ball of ice & 2. radiating as a 16 C BB the surface produces “extra” GHE energy aka radiative forcing (caloric).
Without the atmosphere, water vapor and its 30% albedo Earth would become much like the Moon, a barren rock, hot^3 400 K on the lit side, cold^3 100 K on the dark.
“TFK_bams09” GHE heat balance graphic & its legion of clones uses bad math and badder physics. 63 W/m^2 appears twice (once from Sun & second from a BB calculation) violating both LoT 1 and GAAP. 396 W/m^2 upwelling is a BB calc for a 16 C surface for denominator of the emissivity ratio, 63/396=0.16, “extra” & not real. 333 W/m^2 “back” radiating from cold to warm violates LoT 1 & 2. Remove 396/333/63 from the graphic and the solar balance still works.
Kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules (60%) render a terrestrial BB (100%) impossible as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science.
Since both GHE & CAGW climate “science” are indefensible rubbish alarmists must resort to fear mongering, lies, lawsuits, censorship and violence.
Net zero will make the UK colder and mouldier because we’ve have no energy to run our modern society!!!!! Sorry for the profanity but these net zero zealots are as thick as shit, totally deluded and hypocritical. All the while still wearing clothing made with plastics, and using equipment etc made of plastic and steel. Indoctrinated & dangerous dimwits!!! 🤯
Yes, but you need to append that it is also to assist with the enslavement of said slaves. Keep 'em fearful, keep 'em poor.
Thus spake the new Secretary of State for the Deparment for Peace & War, the Rt Hon Oxym Oron MP, replacing the previous incumbent, The Rt Hon Leo Tolstoy MP, sacked for not being able to communicate in brainless soundbites (he kept trying to write War & Peace while trying to convey nuance).
I won't answer for headlines which always, whatever they are about, are sensationalised; for clicks, to sell ads and to make money for their shareholders and yes according to this study storminess is less likely - but that doesn't alter the fact of anthropogenic global warming.
Nor does it mean that net zero is a disgrace. Though it is a scam to postpone climate action to an indefinite point in the future.
GHE theory fails because of two erroneous assumptions: 1. near Earth space is cold & w/o GHE would become 255 K, -18 C, ball of ice & 2. radiating as a 16 C BB the surface produces “extra” GHE energy aka radiative forcing (caloric).
Without the atmosphere, water vapor and its 30% albedo Earth would become much like the Moon, a barren rock, hot^3 400 K on the lit side, cold^3 100 K on the dark.
“TFK_bams09” GHE heat balance graphic & its legion of clones uses bad math and badder physics. 63 W/m^2 appears twice (once from Sun & second from a BB calculation) violating both LoT 1 and GAAP. 396 W/m^2 upwelling is a BB calc for a 16 C surface for denominator of the emissivity ratio, 63/396=0.16, “extra” & not real. 333 W/m^2 “back” radiating from cold to warm violates LoT 1 & 2. Remove 396/333/63 from the graphic and the solar balance still works.
Kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules (60%) render a terrestrial BB (100%) impossible as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science.
Since both GHE & CAGW climate “science” are indefensible rubbish alarmists must resort to fear mongering, lies, lawsuits, censorship and violence.
So we never has wet winters before the AGW hoax was invented, didn't we?
I'm pretty sure I can remember quite a few in the 1950s and 1960s actually!
Net zero will make the UK colder and mouldier because we’ve have no energy to run our modern society!!!!! Sorry for the profanity but these net zero zealots are as thick as shit, totally deluded and hypocritical. All the while still wearing clothing made with plastics, and using equipment etc made of plastic and steel. Indoctrinated & dangerous dimwits!!! 🤯
We should rename "The Department for Energy Security & Net Zero".
I propose: "The Department for Devout Christian Belief and Witchcraft".
Net Zero is just the updated modern version of the sacrificing of animals and human slaves to appease the Weather Gods.
Yes, but you need to append that it is also to assist with the enslavement of said slaves. Keep 'em fearful, keep 'em poor.
Thus spake the new Secretary of State for the Deparment for Peace & War, the Rt Hon Oxym Oron MP, replacing the previous incumbent, The Rt Hon Leo Tolstoy MP, sacked for not being able to communicate in brainless soundbites (he kept trying to write War & Peace while trying to convey nuance).