The day before Andrew Bridgen’s infamous tweet, I commented on this post by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil:
Here is what I said:
Here is what Andrew Bridgen tweeted the next day:
I had no idea that Norman was Jewish or that his dad was a survivor of the death camps, the only survivor of an extended family. Had I known, would I have still made that comment? Yes, probably, because I believe it accurately reflects the reality of what’s happened and I do not consider it to be anti-Semitic in any way whatsoever. Norman confirms that he did not find Andrew Bridgen’s tweet to be offensive or anti-Semitic.
This Jewish lady also confirms that she does not believe Andrew Bridgen’s tweet to be anti-Semitic:
There is an explosive story going on right now. MP Andrew Bridgen, who led a debate last month in Parliament about the covid vaccines, has come out with some very bold - and very true - statements. He has gotten in major trouble for simply repeating what he was told by a doctor - “As one consultant cardiologist said to me, this is the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust.”
Well, yes. If billions of people, including pregnant women, babies, children, teens, and young adults have been injected - often under great coercion - with a novel therapy that the vast majority of them did not have a conceivable need for, and this injection is scientifically proven to cause blood clots, heart attacks, myocarditis, strokes, rapid onset cancer, autoimmune diseases, increased susceptibility to infection, and many more illnesses (see Pfizer’s own documents for proof of much of that)… then how is this not the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust?
Note that his statement does not make light of the Holocaust in any way. It does not even say whether this crime is equal to or greater than the Holocaust. It simply states that the covid vaccine administration is the greatest crime to have occurred after the Holocaust.
I will go on the record to declare that anyone who is calling MP Andrew Bridgen or his claims racist or anti-Semitic is not speaking for the benefit of the Jewish people.
If we’re talking about Jewish victims… Israel was the first to receive this shot, and most of their population was vaccinated, (under great pressure from the government, with grave untruths told to the population, and with the side effects hidden from them.) Millions of Jews around the world have gotten the “vaccine” as well. Thus, I have little doubt that millions of Jews have been hurt by the shot, and untold numbers have been killed. I know some of the victims personally.
After my comment on Norman’s blog, then Andrew Bridgen’s tweet, Norman’s response to Andrew’s suspension from the Conservative Party, then this response from a Jewish woman published just a couple of hours ago, I find the whole thing rather freaky. ‘Coincidence’ is a dirty word nowadays. Jung had a better term - ‘Synchronicity’.
I remember seeing on Twitter a video of a frantic Israeli woman whose daughter was forced to fight off army officers who were trying to inject her with the vaccine. Her daughter was a young recruit in the Israeli Defence Force and army personnel woke these 16-17 year old recruits in the early hours of the morning, when they were at their most vulnerable and demanded that they all be vaccinated. This woman's daughter managed to refuse, but only by physically having to fight them off of her. Forced medical experimentation upon Jewish children basically, even those who signed up to defend the state of Israel. But Andrew Bridgen is an anti-Semite for highlighting the massive harms of the vaccines? This corrupt, lying, rotten, murdering government is beneath contempt. They are cockroaches.
Yes, this is all very disturbing and despicable. At the time I could not quite believe that of all the governments in the world it was Israel who were first to impose such strict jab mandates on their population, and effectively treat them as Pfizer's labrats. It's very sad but predictable that the pharma whores are now going after Andrew Bridgen.