I seem to be alone in regarding this as a somewhat serious misstep on the part of Bridgen, who has got so much right over the years and who I admire greatly.
I don't beleive there was a virus myself. It was non replicating infrectios clones or DNA plasmids scattered around....the clones could infect but only for a while.
They cannot even with their microscopes see a virus or alter it. They can only play with computer gene sequences.
I have been disappointed by HART for quite some time because of their seeming inability (or fearful reluctance) to join the obvious dots and conclude that Covid-19 was a heinous “plandemic”, as international lawyer Dr Riener Fuellmich (now locked up under false charges) and his colleagues worked out two years ago, see https://metatron.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmichs-grand-jury-court.
I have recently been encouraged that HART are now much closer to acknowledging reality. They don’t quite use the term “plandemic” but they at least now accept that the word “pandemic” was hi-jacked in the context of Covid-19, see: https://www.hartgroup.org/state-of-the-nation/.
As with the climate change hoax, I no longer feel the need to argue against the arcane pseudoscientific arguments put up by lying globalists. There is no point, because it is obvious that almost everything they have told us about Covid and climate change, which they claim is “following the science”, has been a lie. We need to concentrate on exposing their obvious lies.
Here is a hero who is not afraid to get down to brass tacks on speaking out against the obvious intent of these globalist sociopathic psychopaths and their puppet politicians to seize control of our money, our energy and our food supplies for their own nefarious benefit: https://twitter.com/thecoastguy/status/1747957780785328383?t=y3q4M3-FR2W81HGSEi8mqg&s=19.
"In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies." Winston Churchill
.
I think what we've seen during the last four years of the War on Humanity is
"The Big Lie is so precious that it should always be surrounded by a bodyguard of smaller truths".
.
I regret challenging Jaime to a duel using Churchill as a saber; she drew first blood; and it was a subtle strike, so precise and unexpected. However, cunning linguist that I am I will pull out my Solzhenitsyn to say,
.
“We know that they are lying, they know that they are lying, they even know that we know they are lying…”
.
‘They believe they are Churchill. They are the forces of ultimate good holding back the tide of unchecked humanity that floods the earth. Is it truly a “Big Lie” if everyone actually knows it is true? Everyone who is an insider? (“It is a small club and we ain’t in it”)
.
Remember back in the early dark days of 2020 when everyone had a theory about what was happening. Many theories. Many words. Ho hum, another viral outbreak from China, blah, blah, blah boring turn the page.
.
Then, on Friday March 13th, 2020 they cancelled the London Marathon.
.
That got my attention. I had an invitation to participate in that event, one of the 50,000 who were going to run, walk or pub-crawl to the finish line.
.
Well, they canceled the World but I am “selfish and a narcistic jerk” and only cared about my invitation to run thru the streets of London to the sound of the cheering crowds. Even when you are in 20,000th place out of 50,000 with no chance of ‘winning’ they cheer… bless them.
.
We ‘charity runners’ only had to write a letter to an official sponsor as to why we believed we were worthy enough to make a donation to their charity and wear their colors in the race. Easy for a “selfish and a narcistic jerk” to do. But that is another story and an amusing one but for another day.
.
What really got my attention was that out of the 192 nations around the world nearly all of them began to sing the same song and dance the same dance.
.
Amazing when you see a band with 200 members in the London New Year’s Day Parade marching and dancing down Piccadilly past the Ritz Hotel, with perfect cadence. (Two years practice I was informed; I was there and it was amazing.)
.
However, when you turn and see 192 world leaders all singing the same song, dancing the same dance, mostly doing an imitation of those bands, ‘think practiced’ ‘think coached’ that is not amazing that is alarming. How? What? Why?
.
One person canceled my 2020 London Marathon on Friday March 13th, 2020 but 192 people had to work together to cancel the world that same week.
.
Not a coincidence, think of another “C” word.
.
Jokes, puns and mangled quotes aside, I believe that they think they were telling the truth and were ‘guarding it with lies’
.
So, does Solzhenitsyn trump Churchill in this game?
I certainly do not have the credentials to argue the word pandemic, however, the weaponiization of the word was certainly obvious where I live. Many were silenced, fired, robbed of their own wealth, made into pariahs of their own country and forced to abandon sovereignty of their bodies. This I did observe first hand and in great numbers. What I did not observe, luckily, is mass casualties for the small social group I was fortunate to be a part of. I did observe my brother get serious blood clotting issues, in his leg that had to be amputated, shortly after he received the vaxx He does not think is related to the vaxx. I though otherwise, and, suggested he seek alternative treatment. This for 2 years severed our relationship. My son a doctor also was openly hostile when I attempted to discuss this issue with him. Both, thankfully, are are communicating again, for which I am grateful. So, yes, for me this seemed to be a war of sorts.
The definition of the word was of peripheral concern, to me, until the WHO's more recent power grab based on their view of the word. That has certainly made me more concerned. The apparently innocuous definition you quoted hides the seeds to regrow the horror we have already witnessed. My country is eager to sign on to unaccountable, corrupt bureaucrats that could reestablish another round of tyranny base on ability to call most flues a pandemic. That is the more important issue to me.
The rest I leave to the people more well positioned to argue it out and hopefully find common ground that will work for the vast majority of people.
I have to admit, I did catch a flu (which could be covid, I did not test for it) at that time; however, I was perhaps lucky, and did not require hospitalization. My wife caught it as well with similar results. I guess we were just lucky. Just as we were lucky with all the strains since. Which reminds me of a joke from Jack Handey (deep thoughts):
"Children need encouragement.
If a kid gets an answer right, tell him it was a lucky guess.
That way he develops a good, lucky feeling".
I guess I had good parents and have a good lucky feeling.
"there are a lot of people out there who have latched on to the ‘no pandemic’ argument to simltaneously claim that there was no novel virus, no lab leak of a GOF virus and even that viruses do not exist, are not transmissible and/or do not cause disease."
The no virus camp are not 'claiming' anything. They are simply pointing out there is no scientific evidence to support the theory of 'contagion' and that virology does not meet the basic criteria for 'science' (such as being falsifiable).
Every contagion experiment for the last century has failed to make healthy people sick by exposing them to the bodily fluids of sick people. 'Viruses' are defined as 'contagious' and 'pathogenic' particles. With no scientific evidence of sickness via contagion (despite many extremely disgusting experiments involving snot and lung fluid) nobody can claim 'viruses' exist - as defined by virologists themselves. It is simple logic.
That is before we even get into the problems with virology itself, such as the fact that Dr Lanka managed to prove the existence of SARS COV2 with standard cell culture CPE and genome assembly experiments - except he accomplished this without adding a sample from a sick person, thus proving the standard virology protocols are a fraud. The methodology and software by itself can provide 'proof' of a virus. His did the controls that virologists never do. Now we know why they never do them.
This also needs to be put into the context of what happened in 2020. The alleged 'virus' had all the characteristics of not existing, such as causing no increase in sickness or death and having to 'borrow' cases and deaths from the seasonal flu (which 'mysteriously' disappeared) as well as car accidents, cancer, diabetes, heart attacks etc, as well medical neglect and murder (vents, Midazolam, DNR etc) - all of which were marked down as 'covid'.
At best we can say SARS COV2's defining feature is that of having no effect in the physical realm. Having the characteristics of not existing is the same as not existing. Like unicorns, SARS COV2, exists in our culture and we are all familiar with the concept - but in the physical realm (in nature) neither actually exist in an objective sense. They are both mythical or superstitious entities.
More context.... the model of contagion which was used to dictate government policy in 2020 was based on a 2017 experiment by the BBC, Cambridge University and LSHTM to simulate contagion by having 30,000 volunteers download a smartphone app which allowed them to be tracked. The experiment involved zero biology whatsoever. As we have already established, every contagion experiment in the last century has failed to demonstrate contagion in the biological realm (ie people). If you needed to create a model of contagion for an upcoming 'pandemic' and vaccine drive, it would therefore make sense to avoid the biological realm altogether (where failure is guaranteed) and swap people for smartphones and hope that nobody notices, which is precisely what they did. And nobody did notice. This will eventually be recognised as the most ridiculous, desperate, audacious and criminal act of science fraud in history.
The 'no virus' camp are a bunch of foul tempered, dirty, smelly, disgusting, vile, rude, lazy, obnoxious, badly dressed, morons with terrible hair and an appalling taste in music. Now that we've gotten all the ad hom distractions out of the way we can get back to the matter at hand which is that (1) virology does not qualify as a scientific discipline and (2) contagion remains an unproven theory after a century of experiments where nobody ever got sick despite being smeared from head to toe with snot and machine gunned with boogers.
The vaccine/ PPE / lockdown business model and pandemic power grab agenda relies on the public's continued belief in (and fear of) 1. viruses 2. contagion. Therefore there is a HUGE incentive to maintain that belief using whatever means necessary (not just for profits but also to avoid criminal prosecution by billions extremely angry people with vax injuries). If making a meal about 'gain of function' labs keeps the public (including covid skeptics) enthralled by the idea of viruses and contagion then that's money well spent.
Why does GoF get leaked all over the mainstream media, while Dr Rosenau's failed contagion experiments or Dr Lanka's damning virology control experiments never get a mention? The answer is simple. The former keeps people in fear, and the latter removes fear by exposing the whole enterprise as a stupid scam.
Two key bits of background. HART wrote this over two years ago pointing out that "Peter Daszak of Ecohealth Alliance, was in fact a recipient of a 2017 NIH grant award that includes specific plans to construct “an infectious clone of full-length MERS-CoV”":
So a bit odd to claim that HART is not recognising that GoF exists. Is HART perhaps, instead, trying to say that playing up the fact that GoF exists is playing into the hands of the pandemic preparedness types that want to take more of your money and spend it on more 'measures' followed by 'counter-measures'? This is an important question.
The point about novelty is nuanced in this longer piece here, in the sense that every little variant is 'novel', and therefore 'novelty' is not novel (!) - every flu variant is 'novel':
Any claim that SARS-CoV-2 was ‘novel’ in early 2020 is true only in the technical sense that the various circulating coronaviruses regularly present themselves to the human immune system as novel variants. There are now plentiful data points indicating “that in 2019, SARS-CoV-2 circulation was already relatively sustained in Europe and America”:
“In conclusion, a novel unknown respiratory virus that is responsible for severe pneumonia, like SARS-CoV-2, could circulate undetected for months or years, be responsible for many deaths, and even become pandemic, until peculiar characteristics of the disease are noticed that allow its identification”.
Stefano Petti: Undetected and Relatively Sustained Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Circulation Worldwide During 2019
Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 74, Issue 7, 1 April 2022
This should not come as a surprise as “uncontrolled virus circulation in humans before its discovery is typical of the human coronavirus (HCoV) species” and these “‘common cold’ coronaviruses are responsible for 10–30% of common cold cases each winter season”.
And why is it a mis-step to quote an article that has - at its centre - the following key points?
1. Forced social isolation of citizens is always morally and ethically wrong;
2. Forced medical procedures are always morally and ethically wrong;
3. Psychological manipulation of populations without their consent is morally and ethically wrong;
4. Government policies that trample on basic constitutional rights (e.g. the right to work, freedom of movement, free speech) are morally and ethically wrong; and
5. Government policies designed to increase fear are morally and ethically wrong.
There is no attempt in that article to claim no virus, and HART explicitly outlines why it uses the virus model: https://www.hartgroup.org/virus-model/.
This article specifically refers to the HART article written in June 2023, endorsed very recently by Andrew Bridgen and I specifically address the statements therein.
SARS-CoV-2 is UNIQUELY novel in that it has inserts not found in any other circulating coronavirus. The reason, we now know for sure, is that SC-2 was created in a lab, with those specific and very unique inserts. In the article I reference, cited by Bridgen, HART deny that the SC-2 virus is novel and they failed to acknowledge then that the virus was man-made, so it would be encumbent upon HART to now amend their previous position in line with the evidence, especially as Andrew Bridgen is publicly endorsing their article written in June last year.
The January 2024 article specifically references the "null hypothesis" article which makes the novelty distinction that I quoted above.
HART wrote about (and endorsed) the 'lab leak' theory over two years ago, as referenced above. SC-2 therefore being 'novel' is true... the point being made is that all variants are 'novel', and so 'novelty is not novel'.
The danger of hyping SC-2 as being a 'novel lab leak' is that it gives the 'pandemic preparedness' crew exactly what they want: (1) a scared populace that demands (2) huge budgets for 'biosecurity' and more pharmaceutical countermeasures.
I think everyone would agree with you that those who created the chimera (that HART wrote about in 2021 in an article that has been repeatedly referenced) should face the full force of the law.
Saying "all variants are new", therefore novel is NOT novel." is, IMV, nonsense when discussing a man made GOF variant. I can find dozens of quotes about the flu like mildness of Covid. They are correct in the narrow perspective of CFR. Yet there are dozens of peer review reports about multiple complex long term issues with the spike, not associated with any flu, or sometimes very very infrequently, relative to Covid. The harms of the vaccine and the Covid virus, are long, complex, and nearly identical.
Minimising the crime of GOF research that produced Covid, is to invite it again. US and China policy is doing just that. China said "it is liike a cold." The US does less then 10 percent of the testing they formerly did. Policy is 180 degrees from when they hyped Covid. They are responsible for both the viral and vaccine harms, and need to be accountable for both.
But they've been doing this for twenty plus years. Do you think SARS-CoV-2 is the first and only GoF release? Far more reasonable to assume they are all GoF outputs.
Please don't get me wrong. I'm not minimising the GoF crimes, not am I minimising the jab crimes. Far from it! Defund / shut down the lot, I say.
But be nuanced and don't swallow the "official" lab leak story. They want you to think a point leak in late Nov 2019 ran away and infected the world, thus justifying their lockdowns, the masks and the jabs.
Truth is they've been running leaky establishments for years, and SARS-CoV-2 took years of swarming/varying/spreading until they were able shine the spotlight on it with a particular diagnostic test.
There is no 'official' lab leak story. They denied it and still do. 'They' emphasise that by far the greater risk of a deadly pandemic is a 'spillover' from an animal to human host, most likely because of an imaginary 'climate crisis'. They themselves have downplayed the risk of a lab leak of a GOF virus. The true origin of SC-2 has not been revealed because of any story-telling on the part of the establishment, it has been painstakingly uncovered by diligent researchers and scientists who have had to carefully piece together the evidence and thus identify the criminals responsible.
I wrote about the lab leak over two years ago. They didn't want to to think that then, because of you'd thought that then you (not you, you know what I mean: "average citizen who went along with lockdown") would have pushed back against authorities for allowing the nonsense, and you'd have been less likely to take the jab.
Now that you've taken the jab (not you or me, of course...) they want you to believe in the nastiness of GoF to justify infinite spend on pandemic preparedness. They want you to sing this tune.
The tune needs to be refined to say that ALL GoF must end AND THE CONTAGION FILM-STYLE FAIRYTALES ARE JUST THAT: FAIRYTALES.
Let me finish by discussing a peer-reviewed paper published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology back in 2010. The researchers conducted a large-scale comprehensive screening (using a sensitive PCR test) for all four coronaviruses by analysis of 11,661 diagnostic respiratory samples collected in Edinburgh over 3 years between July 2006 and June 2009. And what did they find? “Coronaviruses were detected in 0.3[%] to 0.85% of samples in all age groups. Generally, coronaviruses displayed marked winter seasonality between the months of December and April and were not detected in summer months, which is comparable to the pattern seen with influenza viruses… A total of 11[%] to 41% of coronaviruses detected were in samples testing positive for other respiratory viruses”.
Sound familiar? That is because it is. It happens every year in northern latitudes during autumn and winter. The years 2006 to 2009 were not pandemic – or epidemic – years, and neither is 2020 to 2021. Also the PCR test currently in use is not specific, and is known to pick up other coronaviruses. There is no overriding correlation – let alone causation – linking all the restrictions we are suffering to an amelioration of respiratory disease, which happens every year. There is also no sign whatsoever of exponential growth of cases, hospitalisations or mortality, or an excessive burden on health services due to ‘coronavirus’. It is the restrictions – bubbles, mandatory quarantines, distancing, closures – that are putting pressure on services, and as such are a problem of the government’s own making.
Alex, your assertion.. (correted to clairfy what I think you are aserting...
" Now that the population has taken the jab (not you, of course...) they want the people to believe in the nastiness of GoF to justify infinite spend on pandemic preparedness. They want you to sing tune."
I find illogical. If, as is accurate, GOF research was cause of a global pandemic, then it cannot logically lead to allowing more GOF research.
If those who skirted GOF laws are correctly held accountable, and the more severe the crime the more vigourous the pursuit of justice should be, then the punishment should be more severe, leading to greater deterence of repeat offense. As to preventing future tyranny in the name of pandemic response, pointing out that the very people responsible for the global pandemic, are likewise responsible for the response including the vaccines that was cause to even greater death, and vast economic harm to the world. (In short global tyranny one world government is a disaster in every way) Truth is always the best course.
Alex, I must side with Jamie here. Yes, he does not say "viruses are not real" yet it is my perspective that Covid itself is very novel, not a flu or a cold, man made, and we will not know for years how deadly, as most all the varied harms noted in VAERS, also occur in Covid and anything that breaks down the immune system can be cause to a host of deadly results not directly seen to be associated with the primary cause of the broken immune system. (The spike will spike) So nothing should mimimise the criminal responsability of the creators of the novel manmade GOF virus.
No-one can assert the existence of Stars Cov 2 as the only proof was the flawed and fraudulent PCR test. The bigger mystery is what happened to flu for the last four years.
I am in complete agreement with you re criminal responsibility.
But can I ask you to read the 'null hypothesis' article in detail? This is referenced in the Jan 2023 article re 'novelty':
H0: SARS-CoV-2 was nasty, but not unusually so, and certainly not particularly novel. The cure was worse than the disease.
and:
"Any claim that SARS-CoV-2 was ‘novel’ in early 2020 is true only in the technical sense that the various circulating coronaviruses regularly present themselves to the human immune system as novel variants. There are now plentiful data points indicating “that in 2019, SARS-CoV-2 circulation was already relatively sustained in Europe and America”:"
and:
"The hypothesis that will likely stand the test of time goes like this: a nasty — if not particularly unusual — respiratory disease season was turned into a catastrophe by human misadventure, and this catastrophe was compounded by efforts to save face and justify the unjustifiable. "
As above, the danger of hyping SC-2 as being a 'novel lab leak' is that it gives the 'pandemic preparedness' crew exactly what they want: (1) a scared populace that demands (2) huge budgets for 'biosecurity' and more pharmaceutical countermeasures. And it also hides the culpability of those who (possibly deliberately) made things look worse than they would have been by pushing unnecessary interventions. Those were also criminal. They must not get away with it.
I think it is a political/strategic mis-step too.
I don't beleive there was a virus myself. It was non replicating infrectios clones or DNA plasmids scattered around....the clones could infect but only for a while.
They cannot even with their microscopes see a virus or alter it. They can only play with computer gene sequences.
I have been disappointed by HART for quite some time because of their seeming inability (or fearful reluctance) to join the obvious dots and conclude that Covid-19 was a heinous “plandemic”, as international lawyer Dr Riener Fuellmich (now locked up under false charges) and his colleagues worked out two years ago, see https://metatron.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmichs-grand-jury-court.
I have recently been encouraged that HART are now much closer to acknowledging reality. They don’t quite use the term “plandemic” but they at least now accept that the word “pandemic” was hi-jacked in the context of Covid-19, see: https://www.hartgroup.org/state-of-the-nation/.
As with the climate change hoax, I no longer feel the need to argue against the arcane pseudoscientific arguments put up by lying globalists. There is no point, because it is obvious that almost everything they have told us about Covid and climate change, which they claim is “following the science”, has been a lie. We need to concentrate on exposing their obvious lies.
Here is a hero who is not afraid to get down to brass tacks on speaking out against the obvious intent of these globalist sociopathic psychopaths and their puppet politicians to seize control of our money, our energy and our food supplies for their own nefarious benefit: https://twitter.com/thecoastguy/status/1747957780785328383?t=y3q4M3-FR2W81HGSEi8mqg&s=19.
Perhaps Bridgen reads Churchill
"In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies." Winston Churchill
I think what we've seen during the last four years of the War on Humanity is
"The Big Lie is so precious that it should always be surrounded by a bodyguard of smaller truths".
“Perhaps Bridgen reads Churchill”
"In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies." Winston Churchill
.
I think what we've seen during the last four years of the War on Humanity is
"The Big Lie is so precious that it should always be surrounded by a bodyguard of smaller truths".
.
I regret challenging Jaime to a duel using Churchill as a saber; she drew first blood; and it was a subtle strike, so precise and unexpected. However, cunning linguist that I am I will pull out my Solzhenitsyn to say,
.
“We know that they are lying, they know that they are lying, they even know that we know they are lying…”
.
‘They believe they are Churchill. They are the forces of ultimate good holding back the tide of unchecked humanity that floods the earth. Is it truly a “Big Lie” if everyone actually knows it is true? Everyone who is an insider? (“It is a small club and we ain’t in it”)
.
Remember back in the early dark days of 2020 when everyone had a theory about what was happening. Many theories. Many words. Ho hum, another viral outbreak from China, blah, blah, blah boring turn the page.
.
Then, on Friday March 13th, 2020 they cancelled the London Marathon.
.
That got my attention. I had an invitation to participate in that event, one of the 50,000 who were going to run, walk or pub-crawl to the finish line.
.
Well, they canceled the World but I am “selfish and a narcistic jerk” and only cared about my invitation to run thru the streets of London to the sound of the cheering crowds. Even when you are in 20,000th place out of 50,000 with no chance of ‘winning’ they cheer… bless them.
.
We ‘charity runners’ only had to write a letter to an official sponsor as to why we believed we were worthy enough to make a donation to their charity and wear their colors in the race. Easy for a “selfish and a narcistic jerk” to do. But that is another story and an amusing one but for another day.
.
What really got my attention was that out of the 192 nations around the world nearly all of them began to sing the same song and dance the same dance.
.
Amazing when you see a band with 200 members in the London New Year’s Day Parade marching and dancing down Piccadilly past the Ritz Hotel, with perfect cadence. (Two years practice I was informed; I was there and it was amazing.)
.
However, when you turn and see 192 world leaders all singing the same song, dancing the same dance, mostly doing an imitation of those bands, ‘think practiced’ ‘think coached’ that is not amazing that is alarming. How? What? Why?
.
One person canceled my 2020 London Marathon on Friday March 13th, 2020 but 192 people had to work together to cancel the world that same week.
.
Not a coincidence, think of another “C” word.
.
Jokes, puns and mangled quotes aside, I believe that they think they were telling the truth and were ‘guarding it with lies’
.
So, does Solzhenitsyn trump Churchill in this game?
I certainly do not have the credentials to argue the word pandemic, however, the weaponiization of the word was certainly obvious where I live. Many were silenced, fired, robbed of their own wealth, made into pariahs of their own country and forced to abandon sovereignty of their bodies. This I did observe first hand and in great numbers. What I did not observe, luckily, is mass casualties for the small social group I was fortunate to be a part of. I did observe my brother get serious blood clotting issues, in his leg that had to be amputated, shortly after he received the vaxx He does not think is related to the vaxx. I though otherwise, and, suggested he seek alternative treatment. This for 2 years severed our relationship. My son a doctor also was openly hostile when I attempted to discuss this issue with him. Both, thankfully, are are communicating again, for which I am grateful. So, yes, for me this seemed to be a war of sorts.
The definition of the word was of peripheral concern, to me, until the WHO's more recent power grab based on their view of the word. That has certainly made me more concerned. The apparently innocuous definition you quoted hides the seeds to regrow the horror we have already witnessed. My country is eager to sign on to unaccountable, corrupt bureaucrats that could reestablish another round of tyranny base on ability to call most flues a pandemic. That is the more important issue to me.
The rest I leave to the people more well positioned to argue it out and hopefully find common ground that will work for the vast majority of people.
I noticed that those who didn't buy into the ConVid drama never caught anything. Strange
I have to admit, I did catch a flu (which could be covid, I did not test for it) at that time; however, I was perhaps lucky, and did not require hospitalization. My wife caught it as well with similar results. I guess we were just lucky. Just as we were lucky with all the strains since. Which reminds me of a joke from Jack Handey (deep thoughts):
"Children need encouragement.
If a kid gets an answer right, tell him it was a lucky guess.
That way he develops a good, lucky feeling".
I guess I had good parents and have a good lucky feeling.
not true.
"there are a lot of people out there who have latched on to the ‘no pandemic’ argument to simltaneously claim that there was no novel virus, no lab leak of a GOF virus and even that viruses do not exist, are not transmissible and/or do not cause disease."
The no virus camp are not 'claiming' anything. They are simply pointing out there is no scientific evidence to support the theory of 'contagion' and that virology does not meet the basic criteria for 'science' (such as being falsifiable).
Every contagion experiment for the last century has failed to make healthy people sick by exposing them to the bodily fluids of sick people. 'Viruses' are defined as 'contagious' and 'pathogenic' particles. With no scientific evidence of sickness via contagion (despite many extremely disgusting experiments involving snot and lung fluid) nobody can claim 'viruses' exist - as defined by virologists themselves. It is simple logic.
That is before we even get into the problems with virology itself, such as the fact that Dr Lanka managed to prove the existence of SARS COV2 with standard cell culture CPE and genome assembly experiments - except he accomplished this without adding a sample from a sick person, thus proving the standard virology protocols are a fraud. The methodology and software by itself can provide 'proof' of a virus. His did the controls that virologists never do. Now we know why they never do them.
This also needs to be put into the context of what happened in 2020. The alleged 'virus' had all the characteristics of not existing, such as causing no increase in sickness or death and having to 'borrow' cases and deaths from the seasonal flu (which 'mysteriously' disappeared) as well as car accidents, cancer, diabetes, heart attacks etc, as well medical neglect and murder (vents, Midazolam, DNR etc) - all of which were marked down as 'covid'.
At best we can say SARS COV2's defining feature is that of having no effect in the physical realm. Having the characteristics of not existing is the same as not existing. Like unicorns, SARS COV2, exists in our culture and we are all familiar with the concept - but in the physical realm (in nature) neither actually exist in an objective sense. They are both mythical or superstitious entities.
More context.... the model of contagion which was used to dictate government policy in 2020 was based on a 2017 experiment by the BBC, Cambridge University and LSHTM to simulate contagion by having 30,000 volunteers download a smartphone app which allowed them to be tracked. The experiment involved zero biology whatsoever. As we have already established, every contagion experiment in the last century has failed to demonstrate contagion in the biological realm (ie people). If you needed to create a model of contagion for an upcoming 'pandemic' and vaccine drive, it would therefore make sense to avoid the biological realm altogether (where failure is guaranteed) and swap people for smartphones and hope that nobody notices, which is precisely what they did. And nobody did notice. This will eventually be recognised as the most ridiculous, desperate, audacious and criminal act of science fraud in history.
The 'no virus' camp are a bunch of foul tempered, dirty, smelly, disgusting, vile, rude, lazy, obnoxious, badly dressed, morons with terrible hair and an appalling taste in music. Now that we've gotten all the ad hom distractions out of the way we can get back to the matter at hand which is that (1) virology does not qualify as a scientific discipline and (2) contagion remains an unproven theory after a century of experiments where nobody ever got sick despite being smeared from head to toe with snot and machine gunned with boogers.
The vaccine/ PPE / lockdown business model and pandemic power grab agenda relies on the public's continued belief in (and fear of) 1. viruses 2. contagion. Therefore there is a HUGE incentive to maintain that belief using whatever means necessary (not just for profits but also to avoid criminal prosecution by billions extremely angry people with vax injuries). If making a meal about 'gain of function' labs keeps the public (including covid skeptics) enthralled by the idea of viruses and contagion then that's money well spent.
Why does GoF get leaked all over the mainstream media, while Dr Rosenau's failed contagion experiments or Dr Lanka's damning virology control experiments never get a mention? The answer is simple. The former keeps people in fear, and the latter removes fear by exposing the whole enterprise as a stupid scam.
Bloody marvellous. Well done.
Two key bits of background. HART wrote this over two years ago pointing out that "Peter Daszak of Ecohealth Alliance, was in fact a recipient of a 2017 NIH grant award that includes specific plans to construct “an infectious clone of full-length MERS-CoV”":
https://www.hartgroup.org/a-grandee-exits-stage-left/
So a bit odd to claim that HART is not recognising that GoF exists. Is HART perhaps, instead, trying to say that playing up the fact that GoF exists is playing into the hands of the pandemic preparedness types that want to take more of your money and spend it on more 'measures' followed by 'counter-measures'? This is an important question.
The point about novelty is nuanced in this longer piece here, in the sense that every little variant is 'novel', and therefore 'novelty' is not novel (!) - every flu variant is 'novel':
https://www.hartgroup.org/a-possibly-unpopular-null-hypothesis/
Any claim that SARS-CoV-2 was ‘novel’ in early 2020 is true only in the technical sense that the various circulating coronaviruses regularly present themselves to the human immune system as novel variants. There are now plentiful data points indicating “that in 2019, SARS-CoV-2 circulation was already relatively sustained in Europe and America”:
“In conclusion, a novel unknown respiratory virus that is responsible for severe pneumonia, like SARS-CoV-2, could circulate undetected for months or years, be responsible for many deaths, and even become pandemic, until peculiar characteristics of the disease are noticed that allow its identification”.
Stefano Petti: Undetected and Relatively Sustained Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Circulation Worldwide During 2019
Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 74, Issue 7, 1 April 2022
This should not come as a surprise as “uncontrolled virus circulation in humans before its discovery is typical of the human coronavirus (HCoV) species” and these “‘common cold’ coronaviruses are responsible for 10–30% of common cold cases each winter season”.
And why is it a mis-step to quote an article that has - at its centre - the following key points?
1. Forced social isolation of citizens is always morally and ethically wrong;
2. Forced medical procedures are always morally and ethically wrong;
3. Psychological manipulation of populations without their consent is morally and ethically wrong;
4. Government policies that trample on basic constitutional rights (e.g. the right to work, freedom of movement, free speech) are morally and ethically wrong; and
5. Government policies designed to increase fear are morally and ethically wrong.
There is no attempt in that article to claim no virus, and HART explicitly outlines why it uses the virus model: https://www.hartgroup.org/virus-model/.
This article specifically refers to the HART article written in June 2023, endorsed very recently by Andrew Bridgen and I specifically address the statements therein.
SARS-CoV-2 is UNIQUELY novel in that it has inserts not found in any other circulating coronavirus. The reason, we now know for sure, is that SC-2 was created in a lab, with those specific and very unique inserts. In the article I reference, cited by Bridgen, HART deny that the SC-2 virus is novel and they failed to acknowledge then that the virus was man-made, so it would be encumbent upon HART to now amend their previous position in line with the evidence, especially as Andrew Bridgen is publicly endorsing their article written in June last year.
June 2023?
The January 2024 article specifically references the "null hypothesis" article which makes the novelty distinction that I quoted above.
HART wrote about (and endorsed) the 'lab leak' theory over two years ago, as referenced above. SC-2 therefore being 'novel' is true... the point being made is that all variants are 'novel', and so 'novelty is not novel'.
The danger of hyping SC-2 as being a 'novel lab leak' is that it gives the 'pandemic preparedness' crew exactly what they want: (1) a scared populace that demands (2) huge budgets for 'biosecurity' and more pharmaceutical countermeasures.
I think everyone would agree with you that those who created the chimera (that HART wrote about in 2021 in an article that has been repeatedly referenced) should face the full force of the law.
Saying "all variants are new", therefore novel is NOT novel." is, IMV, nonsense when discussing a man made GOF variant. I can find dozens of quotes about the flu like mildness of Covid. They are correct in the narrow perspective of CFR. Yet there are dozens of peer review reports about multiple complex long term issues with the spike, not associated with any flu, or sometimes very very infrequently, relative to Covid. The harms of the vaccine and the Covid virus, are long, complex, and nearly identical.
Minimising the crime of GOF research that produced Covid, is to invite it again. US and China policy is doing just that. China said "it is liike a cold." The US does less then 10 percent of the testing they formerly did. Policy is 180 degrees from when they hyped Covid. They are responsible for both the viral and vaccine harms, and need to be accountable for both.
But they've been doing this for twenty plus years. Do you think SARS-CoV-2 is the first and only GoF release? Far more reasonable to assume they are all GoF outputs.
Please don't get me wrong. I'm not minimising the GoF crimes, not am I minimising the jab crimes. Far from it! Defund / shut down the lot, I say.
But be nuanced and don't swallow the "official" lab leak story. They want you to think a point leak in late Nov 2019 ran away and infected the world, thus justifying their lockdowns, the masks and the jabs.
Truth is they've been running leaky establishments for years, and SARS-CoV-2 took years of swarming/varying/spreading until they were able shine the spotlight on it with a particular diagnostic test.
There is no 'official' lab leak story. They denied it and still do. 'They' emphasise that by far the greater risk of a deadly pandemic is a 'spillover' from an animal to human host, most likely because of an imaginary 'climate crisis'. They themselves have downplayed the risk of a lab leak of a GOF virus. The true origin of SC-2 has not been revealed because of any story-telling on the part of the establishment, it has been painstakingly uncovered by diligent researchers and scientists who have had to carefully piece together the evidence and thus identify the criminals responsible.
I wrote about the lab leak over two years ago. They didn't want to to think that then, because of you'd thought that then you (not you, you know what I mean: "average citizen who went along with lockdown") would have pushed back against authorities for allowing the nonsense, and you'd have been less likely to take the jab.
Now that you've taken the jab (not you or me, of course...) they want you to believe in the nastiness of GoF to justify infinite spend on pandemic preparedness. They want you to sing this tune.
The tune needs to be refined to say that ALL GoF must end AND THE CONTAGION FILM-STYLE FAIRYTALES ARE JUST THAT: FAIRYTALES.
PS. "seek and ye shall find":
Let me finish by discussing a peer-reviewed paper published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology back in 2010. The researchers conducted a large-scale comprehensive screening (using a sensitive PCR test) for all four coronaviruses by analysis of 11,661 diagnostic respiratory samples collected in Edinburgh over 3 years between July 2006 and June 2009. And what did they find? “Coronaviruses were detected in 0.3[%] to 0.85% of samples in all age groups. Generally, coronaviruses displayed marked winter seasonality between the months of December and April and were not detected in summer months, which is comparable to the pattern seen with influenza viruses… A total of 11[%] to 41% of coronaviruses detected were in samples testing positive for other respiratory viruses”.
Sound familiar? That is because it is. It happens every year in northern latitudes during autumn and winter. The years 2006 to 2009 were not pandemic – or epidemic – years, and neither is 2020 to 2021. Also the PCR test currently in use is not specific, and is known to pick up other coronaviruses. There is no overriding correlation – let alone causation – linking all the restrictions we are suffering to an amelioration of respiratory disease, which happens every year. There is also no sign whatsoever of exponential growth of cases, hospitalisations or mortality, or an excessive burden on health services due to ‘coronavirus’. It is the restrictions – bubbles, mandatory quarantines, distancing, closures – that are putting pressure on services, and as such are a problem of the government’s own making.
(from Dec 2020! https://twitter.com/AlexStarling77/status/1339300970988249090)
Alex, your assertion.. (correted to clairfy what I think you are aserting...
" Now that the population has taken the jab (not you, of course...) they want the people to believe in the nastiness of GoF to justify infinite spend on pandemic preparedness. They want you to sing tune."
I find illogical. If, as is accurate, GOF research was cause of a global pandemic, then it cannot logically lead to allowing more GOF research.
If those who skirted GOF laws are correctly held accountable, and the more severe the crime the more vigourous the pursuit of justice should be, then the punishment should be more severe, leading to greater deterence of repeat offense. As to preventing future tyranny in the name of pandemic response, pointing out that the very people responsible for the global pandemic, are likewise responsible for the response including the vaccines that was cause to even greater death, and vast economic harm to the world. (In short global tyranny one world government is a disaster in every way) Truth is always the best course.
Alex, I must side with Jamie here. Yes, he does not say "viruses are not real" yet it is my perspective that Covid itself is very novel, not a flu or a cold, man made, and we will not know for years how deadly, as most all the varied harms noted in VAERS, also occur in Covid and anything that breaks down the immune system can be cause to a host of deadly results not directly seen to be associated with the primary cause of the broken immune system. (The spike will spike) So nothing should mimimise the criminal responsability of the creators of the novel manmade GOF virus.
No-one can assert the existence of Stars Cov 2 as the only proof was the flawed and fraudulent PCR test. The bigger mystery is what happened to flu for the last four years.
I am in complete agreement with you re criminal responsibility.
But can I ask you to read the 'null hypothesis' article in detail? This is referenced in the Jan 2023 article re 'novelty':
H0: SARS-CoV-2 was nasty, but not unusually so, and certainly not particularly novel. The cure was worse than the disease.
and:
"Any claim that SARS-CoV-2 was ‘novel’ in early 2020 is true only in the technical sense that the various circulating coronaviruses regularly present themselves to the human immune system as novel variants. There are now plentiful data points indicating “that in 2019, SARS-CoV-2 circulation was already relatively sustained in Europe and America”:"
and:
"The hypothesis that will likely stand the test of time goes like this: a nasty — if not particularly unusual — respiratory disease season was turned into a catastrophe by human misadventure, and this catastrophe was compounded by efforts to save face and justify the unjustifiable. "
https://www.hartgroup.org/a-possibly-unpopular-null-hypothesis/
As above, the danger of hyping SC-2 as being a 'novel lab leak' is that it gives the 'pandemic preparedness' crew exactly what they want: (1) a scared populace that demands (2) huge budgets for 'biosecurity' and more pharmaceutical countermeasures. And it also hides the culpability of those who (possibly deliberately) made things look worse than they would have been by pushing unnecessary interventions. Those were also criminal. They must not get away with it.