Following my post yesterday, I came across this post today: I would have liked to have commented but once again, only paid subscribers can comment. I have to say, I’m increasingly finding that Substack is not conducive to open discussion. Too many authors are limiting replies to their posts by using a paywall. So, I’ll say in more detail what I would have liked to have said on Jessica’s post. Don’t get me wrong; I’m certainly no expert and have no training whatsoever in this stuff, which I find incredibly complex and difficult to understand, but I am rather good at detecting common themes and patterns emerging from fearfully complex subjects.
Researching further, I find there is still some controversy regarding the relative importance of ACE2 and CD147 binding, with one paper claiming that CD147 does not bind at all to the spike protein, which it clearly DOES in lung and liver cells. I'm uncertain of CD147's role in binding to endothelial cells, so further reading required. As I say, this stuff is really very complex!
I just looked properly at this post, funnily enough I also tried to reply to Jessica's clotting post and was annoyed, I wrote my reply on her unconditional site, but she never responds anyway!
There is no evidence that any clots or cell damage are caused by a virus. A positive test shows RNA fragments and proteins present in a person that have never been shown to come from a virus. These genetic changes and stress proteins are undoubtedly part of the homeostatic process. The damage/clotting observed could be caused by a person's 'co-morbidiites' , diabetes, CVD, hypertension, obesity, dysbiosis, lack of sleep which allegedly make them more susceptible to 'covid' or by their medications for statins, metformin, ACE inhibitors, anti virals, anti proteases, anti-depressants, flu jabs etc etc. All the studies on clots are observational, not a properly controlled study. Perhaps sars negative patients also have clots but no one is looking for them.
Assessing the impact of so called infection in vitro would involve using control samples from patients with the exact same symptoms but SARs test negative and they would also have to be matched for morbidities and medications.
However the impact of injecting nanoparticles, toxins or indeed any protein where it can get into the blood stream directly and not via the gut is going to be bad! If the jabs do contain mRNA that is translated into 'spike' protein (no evidence it comes from a viurs nor is spike shaped) https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs which is known to be involved in stimulating inflammation etc there's no accounting for the damage it will cause.
Hi Jaime, I was looking for your comment on Joel about lab leak theory but can't find it so will reply here.
(Yes, it really annoys me too when I can't reply to posts!)
I've just seen this from Stefano Scoglio on the '80% of Omni-S mice died' story that did the rounds.
Absolute proof for me that the lab leak is the narrative they want us to follow, waste our time and money trying to prove happened and that it killed people, which we wont be able to do.
'Preprint' non-peer reviewed studies aka propaganda is published on bioriix or medirix website, then is drip fed to MSM and jumped on by undiscerning alternative folks-'80% of Omicron-S mice died!!!
None of the mice died; they were euthanised after scores of ruffled fur, hunched posture, weight loss and respiratory distress. The mice were modified to express extra ACE-2 receptors making more susceptible to 'spike' protein (never shown to come from a virus) damage. We will note and ask, but pass over, why someone would do such barbaric things to fellow earthlings.
The Omicron patient sample had virtually no effect on mice. The 'virus' we are all going on and on about was virtually harmless to mice even after injecting loads of it right up tiny mammals noses and directly into their lungs.
The other two were cell cultures, not samples, and they contained the toxic chemical phenol red.
The 'WT' was made from stressing abnormal cells in culture which we know produces the 'spike' protein, the Omni-S had the spike protein added. We know that the spike protein causes respiratory distress.
All that this shows is that a scary lab leak is the official narrative.
"which have been modified to be more resistant to degradation than the viral spike"
I knew that Vaccine spike was not identical to the viral, but can you elaborate a little on this aspect, or point me towards info ? Many thanks - great article
Researching further, I find there is still some controversy regarding the relative importance of ACE2 and CD147 binding, with one paper claiming that CD147 does not bind at all to the spike protein, which it clearly DOES in lung and liver cells. I'm uncertain of CD147's role in binding to endothelial cells, so further reading required. As I say, this stuff is really very complex!
I just looked properly at this post, funnily enough I also tried to reply to Jessica's clotting post and was annoyed, I wrote my reply on her unconditional site, but she never responds anyway!
There is no evidence that any clots or cell damage are caused by a virus. A positive test shows RNA fragments and proteins present in a person that have never been shown to come from a virus. These genetic changes and stress proteins are undoubtedly part of the homeostatic process. The damage/clotting observed could be caused by a person's 'co-morbidiites' , diabetes, CVD, hypertension, obesity, dysbiosis, lack of sleep which allegedly make them more susceptible to 'covid' or by their medications for statins, metformin, ACE inhibitors, anti virals, anti proteases, anti-depressants, flu jabs etc etc. All the studies on clots are observational, not a properly controlled study. Perhaps sars negative patients also have clots but no one is looking for them.
Assessing the impact of so called infection in vitro would involve using control samples from patients with the exact same symptoms but SARs test negative and they would also have to be matched for morbidities and medications.
However the impact of injecting nanoparticles, toxins or indeed any protein where it can get into the blood stream directly and not via the gut is going to be bad! If the jabs do contain mRNA that is translated into 'spike' protein (no evidence it comes from a viurs nor is spike shaped) https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs which is known to be involved in stimulating inflammation etc there's no accounting for the damage it will cause.
Jo
🐒
Hi Jaime, I was looking for your comment on Joel about lab leak theory but can't find it so will reply here.
(Yes, it really annoys me too when I can't reply to posts!)
I've just seen this from Stefano Scoglio on the '80% of Omni-S mice died' story that did the rounds.
Absolute proof for me that the lab leak is the narrative they want us to follow, waste our time and money trying to prove happened and that it killed people, which we wont be able to do.
'Preprint' non-peer reviewed studies aka propaganda is published on bioriix or medirix website, then is drip fed to MSM and jumped on by undiscerning alternative folks-'80% of Omicron-S mice died!!!
None of the mice died; they were euthanised after scores of ruffled fur, hunched posture, weight loss and respiratory distress. The mice were modified to express extra ACE-2 receptors making more susceptible to 'spike' protein (never shown to come from a virus) damage. We will note and ask, but pass over, why someone would do such barbaric things to fellow earthlings.
The Omicron patient sample had virtually no effect on mice. The 'virus' we are all going on and on about was virtually harmless to mice even after injecting loads of it right up tiny mammals noses and directly into their lungs.
The other two were cell cultures, not samples, and they contained the toxic chemical phenol red.
The 'WT' was made from stressing abnormal cells in culture which we know produces the 'spike' protein, the Omni-S had the spike protein added. We know that the spike protein causes respiratory distress.
All that this shows is that a scary lab leak is the official narrative.
And again makes us wonder why it is the spike protein the mRNA allegedly makes; when we know it damages respiratory cells. https://www.bitchute.com/video/HFoh3bpEVqEq/
Jo
🐒
"which have been modified to be more resistant to degradation than the viral spike"
I knew that Vaccine spike was not identical to the viral, but can you elaborate a little on this aspect, or point me towards info ? Many thanks - great article
I agree 100%. To ignore this and continue to promote jabs is homicide. DELIBERATE homicide.
Very clear explanation - thankyou. I think David Lesondak's book on fascia is relevant here - he has a good section on fibroblasts.... https://garysharpe.substack.com/p/book-review-fascia-what-it-is-and