Pesky volcanoes, messing up scientists’ best laid global warming projections . . . . . .
Oh no wait, 2023 was due to a ‘weird’ El Nino, wasn’t it Zeke? You told us so:
Sorry, but when the cat’s away, the mice will play - and the cat has definitely been let out of the bag now. We all need something to smirk about in these grim times.
Those aren’t real temperature error bars. Those are the hypothetical ones obtained by assuming all the individual measurement processes like thermometers in fields, boat inlet readings, buckets, etc have random errors. This massive assumption only applies to theoretical work. The minute you apply that to the real world, real world validation standards apply. And the temperature data collapses. In reality the tools were never designed to read to sub 0.1 degrees nevermjnd be designed for that signal to noise.
I actually asked the UK government were had they validated and verified the science behind MMGW to be safe to apply to the public. All they did, even after review, was point me at the IPCC reports as if this is adequate. If this was the gold standard then a quick validation exercise would result.
I mean after all, every other science application goes through this process. You’d think it’d be an easy win.
But no. We are dealing with fantasists and they only bring harm with their cultish idiocy.
I even wrote about how this can slip through the cracks.
https://overhead.substack.com/p/beware-of-the-other-santa-clause
It is shocking that he mentions the Pinatubo eruption (because it caused global cooling) but he omits to mention the Hunga Tonga eruption because it caused global warming.
Any honest scientist would surely want to investigate the unprecedented spike of global warming post-Hunga Tonga, but no, he passes it off as just “weird”. Alleged man-made global warming is supposed to happen at a slow but steady rate of about 0.2°C per decade according to the UN IPCC's climate modelling, not 0.9°C in 10 months as seen here in 2023: https://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-global-temperatures/ - a factor of about 54 too fast. And it cannot possibly be due to the still-puny El Nino: https://psl.noaa.gov/enso/mei/.
He can be sure that his lies of omission will find him out eventually.