UN Climate Fraudsters Agree to Create International Money Laundering 'Loss and Damages' Slush Fund - Ukraine Is Not Enough Apparently

It’s what COP27 was ultimately all about: the creation of a money laundering slush fund so tax payers in the developed world could be further defrauded of their earnings which will now supposedly be used to compensate Third World ‘climate vulnerable’ countries for loss and damages caused by bad weather. As we have now seen, with the Ukraine war and the latest Bankman-Fried crypto exchange debacle, very little of this stolen money will end up in the hands of the people it’s supposedly destined for; it will find its way back to a corrupt elite.

Even if this ‘climate fund’ was used to help poor people in Third World countries recover from natural disasters, we don’t owe them a penny because the link between extreme weather (droughts, floods, heatwaves, storms) and allegedly man-made global warming remains scientifically unproven. They’re taking our money under false pretences, using pseudoscience/global warming religion branded as #climatejustice as the excuse to do so.

But even this agreement is still not enough for the hardline doom-mongers who tell us (minus any scientific rationale or evidence whatsoever) that a post industrial warming of 1.5C is the limit beyond which the current ‘climate crisis’ will turn into a ‘climate catastrophe’. They’re unhappy that no further progress was made on reducing emissions even more, immiserating us all further. These people will never be happy until we are all shivering in mud huts and caves - that is, those few who survive Net Zero austerity. Fraudsters like GreenPiss and the trophy hunting supporting World Wildlife Fund for instance:

Environmental charities and campaign groups are starting to react to the climate agreement.

On the whole they seem to be welcoming the deal on loss and damage. Greenpeace have called it "an important foundation in building towards climate justice".

But there have been strong concerns raised that the promised fund could be undermined by the lack of progress on getting agreement to reduce emissions.

Katie White, executive director of advocacy, at the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) said the loss and damage deal "risks becoming a downpayment on disaster unless emissions are urgently cut in line with the 1.5°C goal".

There was talk at one point that there could be a new pledge to "phase down" oil and gas - adding to the commitment last year to phase down coal.

Failure to get this included WWF said will: "put our health and security at risk."

Greenpeace went further - accusing the Egyptians of being influenced by the fossil fuel industry.

Yeb Saño, executive director at Greenpeace Southeast Asia said: "a large number of countries from north and south voiced their strong support for phasing out all fossil fuels...but they were ignored by the Egyptian COP Presidency. Petro-states and a small army of fossil fuel lobbyists were out in force in Sharm el-Sheikh to make sure that it did not happen."

Know this. The war on carbon is a war on humanity, upon civilisation and indeed upon nature itself and, far from being the focus of concern of these fanatics, the actual environment and its rich diversity of wildlife is merely seen as acceptable collateral damage in this war (e.g. environmentally unfriendly wind turbines, solar panels and electric vehicles posited as supposedly ‘clean and green’ and ‘sustainable’, which are anything but).