Trans Activism Is Not About Equality, It's About Supremacy
Biological men (even transitioned trans women) competing against biological women in sports is not about equality, it’s about unfair advantage. It’s about the law of averages. On average, a human being who is born male and has gone through puberty as a male, is going to have a physical advantage over a biological female. That’s a fact. It’s nature. It’s human biology. A fact which is proved by the ascendancy of men identifying as women to top positions in women’s sport. Swimming, cycling, weightlifting, you name it; they are there, winning trophies. This is very demoralising for women competitors and totally unfair. No male who has transitioned to female post puberty should be allowed to compete in women’s sporting competitions - and transitioning children before puberty is an abomination, because they are not mature enough to make that life-changing decision, regardless of what social engineering obsessed shrinks might say. So sports is out.
But what about beauty contests? Surely, men presenting as women would be at a distinct disadvantage in the femininity stakes here? Well, yes they would, on average. A bloke in a bikini is hardly your image of traditional feminine beauty. But even here, trans women are making inroads. A trans woman, Rikkie Valerie Kolle has just won the title of Miss Netherlands. She’s not unattractive; I’ll leave it up to readers to decide whether she deserved to win or not. But this is not the point; she came out, publicly, as trans, prior to competing. This may or may not have influenced the judges’ decisions. Also, how must this make the other women competing in the contest feel? Pretty demoralised I imagine, if they’re losing a beauty contest against an individual who was born male. As demoralised as sportswomen losing against biological males. ‘So what?’ you might say, ‘all credit to a transwoman who can win a beauty contest’. I would agree, except that her identity is an issue because she chose to make it public, not keep it private and by doing so, she set herself apart from the other women in the contest. This seems to me like rubbing our noses in it. This smacks of supremacy - trans supremacy - and it is deliberately demoralising biological women in my opinion.
A mega rich Thai trans woman has now even bought the Miss Universe franchise. Jakapong “Anne” Jakrajutatip is also not shy about revealing the fact she was born male; in fact she makes an issue of it. What kind of message does this send to women competitors? I imagine that some of them must be thinking quite naturally that their chances of winning this contest may be reduced when trans women competitors start taking part, such is the mania for everything trans nowadays.
The trans cult is even vying for competition with the cult of celebrity. Just like the supremacist cult of Hollywood celebrity, the supremacist trans cult is empty of meaning, devoid of brain cells, and its members are just unwitting puppets of a wider trans-humanist new world order lead by an ageing bunch of rich globalist elites who despise humanity and in particular despise the working class commoners who, if they are not to be digitally ‘augmented’ and ‘upgraded’, are destined to be replaced by machines. These globalist elite ‘don’t need no stinking biology’. So, if you get your ‘bits’ cut off/cut out and go round telling the world you’re a real man or a real woman, at the same time as telling us you’re not, or even if you don’t get surgically altered and you tell the world that you’re a ‘man’ giving birth to a child, then you’re part of the ‘in’ crowd as far as the new world order is concerned - until you’re not that is. Because don’t think you’re not disposable like the rest of us. Hollywood will use you and then spit you out when you get too old or don’t conform or when you start thinking too much; the highlight of your day will be crashing into a shopping centre in Malibu. The trans activist ‘community’ will likewise use you up and then dispose of you. Then you’ll be on your own and you might end up being just another lonely metaphorical or literal eunuch, nursing visions of past glory. Fashions die hard.
Ultimately, the trans cult is going nowhere; it’s the gender-bending evolutionary dead end of a wider trans-humanist cult which is destined to fail.
All true. But the real tragedy is the lifelong damage to children. We (speaking for myself) have the advantage of watching this unfold and trying to assess what's happening and apply logic and look to studies and data. Kids are right on the front lines of a battle that includes psyops, raging activists, concerned parents, medical cartel profits, and MSM culture war clickbait. Meanwhile, many of these kids have either been abused, suffer from depression/anxiety/adhd, are on the autism spectrum, or are just typical young people going through immense social pressure to have an identity and be accepted. Ten minutes with a "therapist" (who often is directly connected to a gender affirming medical clinic) and children can be prescribed meds that will have lifelong consequences that they cannot possibly conceptualize at that age.
I imagine there are some children that are, indeed trans, but indoctrinating children into thinking that it's normal and quite common, means that unlike going through a phase where you dress funny and dye your hair, thousands of innocent children will end up destroying their bodies forever.
(This is in the US. I hear many European countries are regaining their sanity. We also still have Round Up in our stores.)
Thanks Jaimie for a restrained, balanced article. The conclusions are likely true. The caravan will move on with the victims crushed underneath.