Is it time to at least be open to the possibility that stratospheric aerosol injections and frequency ionization is playing a role? If you lay a nano-metal sheet that interacts with electromagnetic frequencies one could place cloud cover and maintain it very easily. In addition to the hundreds of papers written in the past decade, “night warming faster than day”, where time and again the most prevalent cause is listed as ‘persistent contrail formation’. Plus the ridiculous levels of aluminum, barium, cadmium in garden soil and rainwater samples across western nations. According to John Brennan in 2016, former head of the CIA, one plane spraying a coal-fly ash enriched fuel produces enough nano-particulate chaff to cover over 30,000 sq miles after the aerosols spread. With your skills, intelligence, writing and research ability, the world cannot afford for you to duck this question, Jaime!
I'm not ducking the question Daniel; I just don't think there is sufficient evidence to conclude that (a) geoengineering is taking place on a large scale, (b) it can produce the type of weather events claimed.
Understand, Occam’s razor here. An extremely cloudy spring brings the ‘warmest months ever’. It’s is due to higher nighttime averages and the increased cloud cover trapping radiative heat. We have two decades of scientific papers describing night warming faster than day thanks to ‘persistent contrail formation’. However, most of your cloud whitening in the UK would come from sea based operations, cheaper, more efficacious and unnoticeable. I may have a different perspective living near a land locked military base with restricted flight paths, but on any warmer than average day will always see a checkerboard being laid down above my head. I enjoy your writing so much, can only imagine what you will uncover when accepting that geoengineering is happening in many different forms to achieve their desired climate results.
Daniel, whilst it's likely that thin high level contrail cirrus will result in net warming by allowing most short waver solar radiation to penetrate to the surface during the day, but trapping long wave solar radiation at night, the same is not true of much thicker low level cloud cover - which clouds have been a dominant feature of the weather in the UK throughout spring. They reflect more radiation during the day than they trap at night. Many days throughout spring have been cold and wet as a result. The Met Office data is just not credible for this reason.
They are from the official network of Met Office weather stations. For the record, I don't think this is UHI effect because the most extreme night time temperature anomalies were in northern Scotland, far away from the major conurbations of the south.
Well that's interesting we've been in Scotland for last week in May and it's been unseasonally cold with cold north wind 4 June have had snow on top Cairngorms I know that's June but even so weather been in this pattern for some time.... Have you actually seen their calculations? Proper scientists would investigate the anomaly on min temperatures not just use it blindly....
Of course, it is not the warmest may ever, that’s absurd. First of all, it is likely that the data has been fudged. Secondly, this index called anomality is a statistical abomination. Since climate scientists apparently are clueless about type 1 and type 2 error, I cannot take them seriously as scientists.
It may be a little warmer now than 40 years ago, and it may be due to man. However, it being somewhat warmer and more co2 is good for nature and growth.
It's good that so-called "climate scientists" (overwhelmingly paid-for propagandists) are incoherently baffled by these strange development, anolagous to the pretend bafflement of medical scientist at all the post-Covid jab injuries and deaths.) It shows that their mendacious narrative is falling apart.
The relationship between global and national temperatures and weather seems very tenuous. We saw that post- Hunga Tonga when the CET spiked massively in March 2022 with negligible change in UK weather and belatedly (when the HT cooling aerosols had dispersed) in "boiling" global 2023.
Cool March, cold April, unremarkable May, whilst generally very wet, overcast and quite miserable. The Met Office would have us believe this was the hottest Spring ever, No, they're gaslighting us on a grand scale. This looks like the work of the behavioural insights 'nudge' team to me.
I've been thinking about it and you're right. Meteorological explanations, warm nights, even urban heat island effect, just don't seem to explain this bizarre data in the face of the almost universal public perception of UK spring 2024 being cool, or cold and very wet and miserable. Agreed, it's bollocks. Met Office data cannot be trusted any longer.
My impression of May in "boiling" Scotland is that it felt rather cool. I could confirm this from my recorded energy meter readings, but I'm away from home at present. It wasn't until around mid-May or even later that we set the CH to off.
This is what so many people are saying from different areas of the UK. How is the perception of the population so at odds with the data which the Met Office are trying to spin to us?
You only have to scroll down through the replies to that post on X from the Met Office. There are LOTS of them and almost every single one is highly critical or taking the piss! These are people who have 'lived through the hottest May evah' and survived! No, definitely something amiss here which is not related to actual meteorological events.
Fox Weather was foreshadowing the intense hurricane season that is upon us here in the US and how US offshore oil and natural gas industries may be interrupted. We’ve already had extreme weather conditions throughout the central part of the US, which is very red politically, why not continue the fun and engineer extremely damaging hurricanes for the good dissenters along the Gulf Coast and Atlantic.
You got that right! Over a thousand years ago the climate was a lot hotter than it's been in the last 100 years. John Kerry was the perpetrator of climate change. Back then he was not a millionaire of his own making. His wife was a multiple millionaire.
Kerry started the sale of carbon credits and became the mouthpiece for climate change. He become a new millionaire on his own then.
There were 668 or so climatologists who did not agree with him. If you keep pushing a lie long enough people will start to believe it. The left media in my country fell in line and ramped up the rhetoric and made it central to pushing corporations and others to conform, as well as shutting down resources like coal fired electrical plants and oil and mining production. Strangling the people with higher fuel and electrical prices among other things.
He and Jane Fonda both were accused of treason during the Vietnam War. Kerry was an officer back then and should have been brought up on charges but people in government protected him from that.
It's interesting how some people forget as time passes. If he had been charged with treason during wartime he would have been put before a firing squad.
Is it time to at least be open to the possibility that stratospheric aerosol injections and frequency ionization is playing a role? If you lay a nano-metal sheet that interacts with electromagnetic frequencies one could place cloud cover and maintain it very easily. In addition to the hundreds of papers written in the past decade, “night warming faster than day”, where time and again the most prevalent cause is listed as ‘persistent contrail formation’. Plus the ridiculous levels of aluminum, barium, cadmium in garden soil and rainwater samples across western nations. According to John Brennan in 2016, former head of the CIA, one plane spraying a coal-fly ash enriched fuel produces enough nano-particulate chaff to cover over 30,000 sq miles after the aerosols spread. With your skills, intelligence, writing and research ability, the world cannot afford for you to duck this question, Jaime!
I'm not ducking the question Daniel; I just don't think there is sufficient evidence to conclude that (a) geoengineering is taking place on a large scale, (b) it can produce the type of weather events claimed.
Understand, Occam’s razor here. An extremely cloudy spring brings the ‘warmest months ever’. It’s is due to higher nighttime averages and the increased cloud cover trapping radiative heat. We have two decades of scientific papers describing night warming faster than day thanks to ‘persistent contrail formation’. However, most of your cloud whitening in the UK would come from sea based operations, cheaper, more efficacious and unnoticeable. I may have a different perspective living near a land locked military base with restricted flight paths, but on any warmer than average day will always see a checkerboard being laid down above my head. I enjoy your writing so much, can only imagine what you will uncover when accepting that geoengineering is happening in many different forms to achieve their desired climate results.
Daniel, whilst it's likely that thin high level contrail cirrus will result in net warming by allowing most short waver solar radiation to penetrate to the surface during the day, but trapping long wave solar radiation at night, the same is not true of much thicker low level cloud cover - which clouds have been a dominant feature of the weather in the UK throughout spring. They reflect more radiation during the day than they trap at night. Many days throughout spring have been cold and wet as a result. The Met Office data is just not credible for this reason.
Where are the temperatures used taken from? Have they just used 'heat islands' for night time minimums?
They are from the official network of Met Office weather stations. For the record, I don't think this is UHI effect because the most extreme night time temperature anomalies were in northern Scotland, far away from the major conurbations of the south.
Well that's interesting we've been in Scotland for last week in May and it's been unseasonally cold with cold north wind 4 June have had snow on top Cairngorms I know that's June but even so weather been in this pattern for some time.... Have you actually seen their calculations? Proper scientists would investigate the anomaly on min temperatures not just use it blindly....
Of course, it is not the warmest may ever, that’s absurd. First of all, it is likely that the data has been fudged. Secondly, this index called anomality is a statistical abomination. Since climate scientists apparently are clueless about type 1 and type 2 error, I cannot take them seriously as scientists.
It may be a little warmer now than 40 years ago, and it may be due to man. However, it being somewhat warmer and more co2 is good for nature and growth.
It's good that so-called "climate scientists" (overwhelmingly paid-for propagandists) are incoherently baffled by these strange development, anolagous to the pretend bafflement of medical scientist at all the post-Covid jab injuries and deaths.) It shows that their mendacious narrative is falling apart.
The relationship between global and national temperatures and weather seems very tenuous. We saw that post- Hunga Tonga when the CET spiked massively in March 2022 with negligible change in UK weather and belatedly (when the HT cooling aerosols had dispersed) in "boiling" global 2023.
An unremarkable May here in Essex!! Certainly not like the barmy May of 2020!!! The nights were quite cold as I recall
Cool March, cold April, unremarkable May, whilst generally very wet, overcast and quite miserable. The Met Office would have us believe this was the hottest Spring ever, No, they're gaslighting us on a grand scale. This looks like the work of the behavioural insights 'nudge' team to me.
There's only one thing I can say to that - BOLLOCKS!
And that's the polite version!
I've been thinking about it and you're right. Meteorological explanations, warm nights, even urban heat island effect, just don't seem to explain this bizarre data in the face of the almost universal public perception of UK spring 2024 being cool, or cold and very wet and miserable. Agreed, it's bollocks. Met Office data cannot be trusted any longer.
Are they doing those stick-a-thermometer-up-the-jet engine' arse Airport measurements again? Naughty Naughty.
My impression of May in "boiling" Scotland is that it felt rather cool. I could confirm this from my recorded energy meter readings, but I'm away from home at present. It wasn't until around mid-May or even later that we set the CH to off.
This is what so many people are saying from different areas of the UK. How is the perception of the population so at odds with the data which the Met Office are trying to spin to us?
If you've got dewpoint/humidity data that might offer some clues. Just a small % increase in humidity can dramatically increase nighttime temps.
You only have to scroll down through the replies to that post on X from the Met Office. There are LOTS of them and almost every single one is highly critical or taking the piss! These are people who have 'lived through the hottest May evah' and survived! No, definitely something amiss here which is not related to actual meteorological events.
Fox Weather was foreshadowing the intense hurricane season that is upon us here in the US and how US offshore oil and natural gas industries may be interrupted. We’ve already had extreme weather conditions throughout the central part of the US, which is very red politically, why not continue the fun and engineer extremely damaging hurricanes for the good dissenters along the Gulf Coast and Atlantic.
https://www.foxweather.com/weather-news/2024-atlantic-hurricane-season-us-oil-natural-gas-industry
You got that right! Over a thousand years ago the climate was a lot hotter than it's been in the last 100 years. John Kerry was the perpetrator of climate change. Back then he was not a millionaire of his own making. His wife was a multiple millionaire.
Kerry started the sale of carbon credits and became the mouthpiece for climate change. He become a new millionaire on his own then.
There were 668 or so climatologists who did not agree with him. If you keep pushing a lie long enough people will start to believe it. The left media in my country fell in line and ramped up the rhetoric and made it central to pushing corporations and others to conform, as well as shutting down resources like coal fired electrical plants and oil and mining production. Strangling the people with higher fuel and electrical prices among other things.
He and Jane Fonda both were accused of treason during the Vietnam War. Kerry was an officer back then and should have been brought up on charges but people in government protected him from that.
It's interesting how some people forget as time passes. If he had been charged with treason during wartime he would have been put before a firing squad.