Sars-Cov-2 Variants: This Changes Everything

Jessica Rose has cross-posted a Substack article which examines further the claim that all of the Covid variants and sub-variants are synthetic and not the products of natural evolution, either unforced or in response to mass ‘vaccination’ (sorry Geert):

"Unnatural evolution": indisputable evidence for deliberate and systematic creation of circulating covid variants

Here is a graphic of the ‘reversion panel’ for Omicron BA.1, reproduced from PSMI’s article, which illustrates the unnatural origin of the variant:

I wrote about the Japanese study a month ago here:

PSMI’s discussion of the paper is a lot more technical, but I just want to highlight what the author concludes in summary:

As if all that weren't enough, Tanaka and Miyazawa point out another line of evidence that of itself is probably enough to conclude that omicron variants are unnatural.

The explanation of mutations above pointed out that in nature you expect to see:

• some that have some material and beneficial effect on the organism; and

• some that are "silent" or "synonymous" which do not affect the proteins produced from the RNA/DNA, and should not change the organism's ability to reproduce

These "synonymous" mutations which don't actually change the corresponding protein are, as you might expect, initially far more common than those which affect the protein itself. They usually would have no effect on the ability of the virus to survive, so they just accumulate naturally over time, alongside the more functionally meaningful acquisition of beneficial non-synonymous mutations.

But the official omicron variants mentioned here all have just a single synonymous mutation in the gene encoding the spike protein - as compared to 31 to 38 non-synonymous mutations.

This makes no sense. Natural evolution would always be expected to create neutral synonymous mutations at a greater rate than non-synonymous mutations that can only persist if, against high odds, they result in a design improvement in the protein they encode.

It's clear that some or all omicron variants were synthesised in a laboratory from which they were somehow released, as part of a deliberate program. Coupled with the lack of synonymous mutations in other variants, this suggests that all variants described after the original Wuhan strain have artificial origins.

It's anyone's guess what the purpose of that experiment might be.

Conclusion: this changes everything

If the observations and inferences in this paper are correct - and barring a pure hoax, involving fraudulent depositions to sequence databases, they certainly seem to be - then they provide indisputable evidence that the entire history of SARS-CoV2, at least subsequent to the emergence of the original strain, is artificial.

Someone, somewhere, really is doing all this deliberately.

This only looks as far as Omicron early versions. The subsequent variants and subvariants are not examined, but if all so called ‘variants of concern’ up to and including Omicron were synthetic (lab origin), then it’s a fair guess that the latest variants are probably also of unnatural origin too. This would include of course one of those same unnatural variants which Pfizer has used to modify the target of its new mRNA spike-based ‘vaccine’ (tested on 20 mice this this time, versus just 8 previously), which FDA has approved for administration to everyone aged 6 months and over. That’s comforting to know isn’t it?