God forbid the medical freedom movement/antivaxxer movement, Covid sceptic/climate sceptic/Net Zero sceptic movements ever become established ‘communities’. Communities don’t change the world. Big ideas (good and bad) change the world, technology (good and bad) changes the world. Newton’s Laws of Motion and differential calculus changed the world, quantum physics and derived technology changed the world, steam-driven engines changed the world, electricity changed the world, hydrocarbon and fossil fuels changed the world, the internal combustion engine changed the world - all for the better. mRNA and DNA ‘vaccines’ (bad technology) have changed the world for the worse - people are dead, dying and sick. The Covid injections have possibly killed a great many more people for every life they have allegedly ‘saved’, as many as 17 million in total according to Denis Rancourt. Whatever the case, the deaths and injuries attributable to Covid ‘vaccination’ are now undeniable and they are far from insignificant.
Electric vehicles are bad technology, in terms of engineering efficiency, economics and the environment, hence they are being universally rejected despite the Net Zero communists attempting to force people to drive them. Same with heat pumps. Net Zero is a very bad Big Idea, human-caused global warming is very bad Big ‘Science’ and ‘renewables’ are a technology designed to fail, creating a hell of a lot of mess along the way, including dead whales and the widespread industrialisation of pristine natural environments - so much for ‘saving the planet’.
Good ideas and good technology still have the potential to change our world for the better, if the ‘communities’ currently rejecting the bad ideas and bad technology become truly global and embrace the majority of humanity. Then perhaps we can restore the natural drive towards innovation and improvement which gave us the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution, a process which takes everyone along with it, not just the crony Green capitalists, the Big Pharma executives and the mega rich elite globalists and corporatists who want a world with no free range plebs running around and far less of us plebs in general.
Our opponents are often described as "technocrats", Oxford Dictionary: "a member of a technically skilled elite",⁷ but they are nothing of the sort. In our modern world, most issues are of a technical nature but these so-called elite technocrats are mostly just uninformed and bossy amateurs. Hence we end up with technically unqualified people trying to design and impose, inter alia, national energy, transport, health and agriculture infrastructures, with predictably disastrous results.
The only surprise is that it is taking so long for the general public to realise they are being horribly abused.
I think we're on the same page but I tend to disagree that communities don't change the world. It depends on how you use the concept of community.
I'm sure you'll agree that the world has been changed for the worse by the community of net-zero Covid zealots, the community of critical race theorists, and so on. They have been able to form such quasi-religious communities partly because of the speed of communication and partly because they have come to believe in 'scientism' having been uneducated in the unprecedented benefits of the Scientific Enlightenments and the Industrial and Agricultural revolutions.