Information For Women: The Menstrual Cycle And Nanoparticle Toxicity

The Vigilant Fox has written this Substack;

Pfertility Megathread: Study Funded By The NIH Finds That 40.2% Of Vaccinated Women Experienced Menstrual Changes

Here’s the Twitter thread, which you can comment on if (unlike myself) you are not permanently suspended.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox

🧵#Pfertility Megathread Study Funded By The NIH Finds That 40.2% Of Vaccinated Women Experienced Menstrual Changes That means that over 40 million women in the United States have had their menstrual cycles affected by the C19 jab. Source: t.me/childcovidvacc…

According to an NIH study, over 40% of vaccinated women in the US have experienced disruption to their menstrual cycles. This includes menstruating and post menopausal women! FFS! First they claimed it was just a few hysterical women linking quite natural fluctuations in their menopause with the jabs, then they reluctantly agreed to ‘look into it’, now they say it’s affected 40% of all women!

Back in June 2021, I wrote a post about these odd changes in menstruation post vax and had a stab at what might be causing it (mainly because very few of the ‘experts’ could be arsed to do so):

What's Causing Abnormal Periods in Women Post 'Vaccination'?

I quoted the Daily Expose:

Despite over 4,000 women reporting these issues post-vaccination, doctors have said that there is “no increased risk” of period problems after the jab so there is no reason to add it to the growing list of side effects.

I wrote at the time:

So what's going on? Well, the first clue might be the peer reviewed scientific literature which demonstrates that lipid nanoparticles in the blood stream tend to accumulate in the ovaries and the second clue is the demonstration that Covid 'vaccine' lipid nanoparticles and spike proteins do not stay confined to the local injection site and can in fact escape into the blood vessels and thus travel throughout the body. The former has been known about since at least 2013, so Pfizer and Moderna knew, in advance, that if their product did manage to escape into the blood stream, it would accumulate in the female reproductive organs. Here for instance:

I think that this might be the 2013 study that Jessica Rose talks about:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox

"Not a New Thing": It's Been Known for 10 Years That Lipid Nanoparticles Accumulate in the Ovaries @JesslovesMJK: "This was known. This was known by them at the time that they were pushing these products on people, including pregnant women—and women in general."

So Pfizer and Moderna knew that their product got into the general circulation and they knew that the lipid nanoparticles would preferentially accumulate in the ovaries. The third instalment of the Walker Project Veritas sting video demonstrates that Pfizer were aware of problems with women’s menstrual cycles:

Third Dr. J. T. Walker/Pfizer-Project Veritas Video

Malone says:

What are the most important take-aways from this new video evidence?

1. Pfizer is well aware of the alterations in menstruation associated with administration of their mRNA-based product. Apparently Pfizer (and the FDA) do not find this particularly concerning, as Dr. Walker comments that this will have to be investigated sometime in the future (“so people will have to investigate that down the line”)

2. Per Dr. Walker, a leading internal hypothesis for the cause of this (the pathophysiologic basis) is that the mRNA/Pseudouridine/lipid nanoparticle is damaging some aspect of the “hypothalamus, pituitary, gonadal axis”. (“somehow the vaccine must be interacting with that axis, the HPG axis, to cause mutations in menstrual cycles”)

But this is only part of the story. I decided to do a bit more research and it gets worse. I hazarded a wild guess at what might be causing the disruption to women’s periods in June 2021, after doing some basic research:

An interesting study published in 1998 looked at ionized proteins and their ability to pass unhindered (or not) through the selectively permeable ovarian follicular blood barrier. It's interesting because it reveals that the permeability of the barrier depends on the ionizing charge of the protein molecule, and whether or not ovulation is taking place:

Basically, what this study found is that negatively charged proteins could only pass across the ovarian blood-follicle during an ovulatory surge. The egg during ovulation starts to develop in the follicle and is released into the uterus some days later and if it is not fertilized, the uterine lining breaks down and a woman passes blood from the vagina.

Now this is just pure speculation on my part but could these disruptions to women's periods have anything to do with maybe negatively charged lipid nanoparticles or even negatively charged soluble spike proteins passing preferentially into the the follicle during ovulation, contaminating the developing egg therein, the same egg which is later released directly into the uterus, stimulating the breakdown of the uterine lining and consequent loss of blood if it is infertile? Could the contamination of the egg with toxic spike proteins and/or lipid nanoparticles be resulting in these irregularities in women's periods? It's an unsettling thought and as I say it is pure layperson speculation on my part. I have no idea what ionising charge the lipids may have, whether positive or negative, whether that charge varies, and the same for the spike proteins, but I believe it should at least be looked at. The heavier periods may of course be as a consequence of the presence of the lipids/spike proteins in the blood vessels which feed the uterine lining and have nothing to do with the egg. However, if the egg itself is being contaminated with these products of the 'vaccine', then I would think this definitely has implications for fertility.

Just wild speculation back then but now I learn that the accumulation of LNPs in the ovaries does in fact vary according to the stage of the menstrual cycle, hence the concentration of LNPs in the ovaries (as we shall see) is highest late in the menstrual cycle when the egg is fully developed and due to be released into the uterus. In the absence of fertilisation from available sperm, the uterine lining breaks down and the woman bleeds, whereupon the whole cycle starts again. For most women, the cycle, its timing and its character, were very regular and predictable for each woman - prior to the Covid ‘vaccines’ that is.

This 2020 study performed on mice showed that the accumulation of nanoparticles was dependent on which stage of the estrus cycle the female mouse was experiencing:

Throughout the female menstrual cycle, physiological changes occur that affect the biodistribution of nanoparticles within the reproductive system. This can have positive or negative effects. We demonstrate a 2-fold increase in nanoparticle accumulation in the ovaries during female mouse ovulation compared to the non-ovulatory stage following intravenous administration. Accumulation in the reproductive system is favored by nanoparticles smaller than 100 nm. Chemotherapeutic nanoparticles administered during ovulation increased ovarian toxicity and decreased short-term and long-term fertility when compared to the free drug. Breast cancer treated with nanomedicines during ovulation results in higher drug accumulation in the reproductive system rather than at the site of the tumor, reducing treatment efficacy. Conversely, ovarian cancer treatment was improved by enhanced nanoparticle accumulation in the ovaries during ovulation. Our findings suggest that the menstrual cycle should be considered when designing and implementing nanotherapeutics for females.

The effect of the menstrual cycle on nanoparticle biodistribution and activity is overlooked in the study of therapeutic nanotechnologies. The female reproductive system, which harbors the egg reservoir, undergoes cyclic hormonal and physiological changes that lead to ovulation¹. During the pre-ovulatory stage, increased blood flow, angiogenesis and perfusion within the reproductive system support oocyte maturation, with consequences for nanoparticle distribution (Figure 1a)^1,2. For female mice, the estrous cycle (the equivalent of the human female menstrual cycle) is divided into four stages: diestrus, proestrus, estrus, and metestrus³. At the end of the proestrus stage, ovulation occurs, followed by the estrus stage.

Biodistribution of nanoparticles during the female mouse menstrual cycle.

During the estrus stage there is increased blood supply to the ovary to support preovulatory follicles. After ovulation, a dense blood network termed the corpus luteum is observed. Higher density of blood vessels around the follicle result in higher accumulation of nanoparticles (blue) in the reproductive system (a). By contrast, there are fewer blood vessels in the ovary and around the follicles specifically during the diestrus stage (b).

So this study found that, due to the increased supply of blood vessels around the follicles during the estrus (ovulation) stage of the menstrual cycle in mice, LNPs accumulated much more rapidly. This means that in human females, it is probably also the case that lipid NPs, if injected into the body at or around the time of ovulation, when the egg is nearing maturation, will also tend to accumulate more rapidly in the ovaries and thus present more of a risk to the developing follicle plus other toxic effects. Recall that the study I looked at in June 2021 demonstrated that negatively charged particles could traverse the blood-follicle barrier only during ovulation. So, not only do ionised LNPs accumulate at a faster rate during ovulation, they are also able to penetrate the follicle, which contains the developing egg.

I wouldn’t recommend any woman get these jabs but it looks like the least risky time to do it, in terms of possible toxicity effects upon the reproductive system, is just after ovulation, before the beginning of a new menstrual cycle. The worst time is probably late in the menstrual cycle, about a week or maybe less before the period.

This 2017 study, which looked at mainly metal nanoparticles, found that they can pass through the blood-follicle barrier, with potential effects upon fertility and also disrupt the sex hormone levels in reproductive age females. NPs can also penetrate the placental barrier and enter a developing fetus:

Recent studies have shown that NPs disturb the developing oocyte by invading the protective barrier of theca cells, granulosa cell layers and zona pellucida. NPs disrupt sex hormone levels through the hypothalamic–pituitary-gonadal axis or by direct stimulation of secretory cells, such as granule cells, follicle cells, thecal cells and the corpus luteum. Some NPs can cross the placenta into the fetus by passive diffusion or endocytosis, which can trigger fetal inflammation, apoptosis, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, low weight, reproductive deficiency, nervous damage, and immunodeficiency, among others.

Pfizer and Moderna knew that their LNPs were a danger to the female reproductive system and the developing fetus. If the staggering decreases in live births around the world in highly vaxxed countries are anything to go by, then we are seeing the horrifying results of their deliberate deception and the universal campaigns of extreme coercion and mandating of Covid vaccination.