There are people who will tell you that SARS-CoV-2 is/was a uniquely deadly virus which arose naturally (most likely as a result of human encroachment on natural systems?) and that it was responsible for millions of deaths around the world. Among these people there are politicians, experts, advisers, celebrities, media personalities and members of the public who wanted us all to know just how dangerous this thing was and how many lives were lost to it.
There are also many people, like yourself Jaime (great summary, thanks!) and like us folk commenting here, who believe something different.
Both groups agree that terrible damage was done to humanity over a period starting in early 2020 and usually referred to as 'Covid' or 'The Pandemic'.
Here's one thing about the people in the first group that I cannot get my head around. Why are they not incensed when it's finally admitted that the virus they believe to have killed millions, was actually created by known individuals, funded by known organisations? If they truly believe millions died when infected with this virus, then why are they not now screaming for the prosecution of those who created it?
Could it be that their disdain for those of us in the second group is so strong that they simply cannot bring themselves to admit to sharing any common ground with us? To the extent that they would rather allow the people responsible for all the deaths they believe it caused, to go unpunished?
There is no evidence at all that SARS-CoV-2 was a zoonosis. 'Proximal Origins' was a scientific fraud. Many of the people who state that Covid was a deadly zoonosis know that it was neither particularly deadly nor of natural origin. Those people are heavily invested in the scam political response to the virus and they should be in prison. Anyone else who still believes that SC-2 was a virus which jumped from animals to humans is either deluded or perennially stupid.
The evidence that SC-2 was a bio-engineered virus is now beyond all doubt, not just because of this latest document release. There is a mass of genetic/biological/pathological data and evidence, plus other documentation in the public sphere which proves conclusively that SC-2 was man-made and that it was the gain of function genetically engineered S1/S2 spike incorporating a furin cleavage site, unique among known beta coronaviruses, which was responsible for the harm it caused to a minority of susceptible individuals.
There are those who believe that SC-2 never existed as a unique virus and that 'gain of function' is a myth. Their position is now untenable.
It is going to take a lot of resolve to carry this message forward. But this may be the most important message so far in this century. A “virus” that destroyed individuals, people, families, businesses, economic systems, rights, freedoms. This needs to be ridden hard.
As you know, these moronic , (the followers),and criminal (the instigators), behavior permeates all governments, and most other organizations. I don't know how we continue without real accountability. Things may have to get uncomfortable.
Chalk up a big vindication for the conspiracy theorists!
It’s shocking how little mention there is of these revelations in the corrupt MSM. Let’s hope the Trump administration makes a big thing of it. Ditto the Russians who vehemently objected to all the US biolabs sited just over their border in Ukraine but were fobbed off by Biden and the deep state blob. The Russians even took it to the UN and Russia’s General Igor Kirillov who led the investigation into Ukraine biolabs was assassinated, most likely on the orders of the deep state.
Dougie - thanks for that link. Found this partial quote interesting/sinister -
"In the weeks that followed, the Russians showed the Security Council evidence like a Ukrainian email asking a Turkish drone manufacturer whether its products could “carry 20 liters of aerosolized payload to a range of 300 kilometers – putting them in range of a dozen major Russian cities.” They also provided a June 2019 guidance from Ukraine’s Public Health Ministry that insisted on secrecy —not exactly what you insist on when everything is on the up-and-up— and that required “serious” adverse incidents “including the death of the subjects” to be reported to US authorities within 24 hours."
We live in a technocracy run by middle manager types who are interested only in stabbing each other in the back to obtain promotion. They rely on those boffin chappies to tell them what's cool in (bio)science and they haven't a clue whether what they're told is right, wrong or just misleading.
None of them either as an individual or as a group is capable of handling the problems that a technological society throws up. This is our doom (OK I've been watching Lord of the Rings again).
Until we can find a political system under which good policy is made in response to novel and complex problems, we are fated to spiral down to complete collapse. Have a nice day.
I have always loved "The Lord of the Rings". The more complete couplet related to the rings of power was:
"Three Rings for the Elven-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die,
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
One Ring to rule them all. One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie."
The idea of rings of power is as old as history. If you are of the conspiracy mindset, I must say, that I am more and more of that way of thinking, it was codified by the Jesuits (probably just borrowed from fertile historical bias). Generally control and information flows towards the inner rings. The more distal rings are more and more about service and subservience to the inner rings and propaganda and lies to keep them in that state.
If you are to draw a more modern connection, the controllers of AI centres maybe close to the Elven-kings. I don’t even know why the general public does not see why the centralization of this very invasive technology (even if it is not so intelligent yet) can be use to enslave us all (the mortal men doomed to die). Why are we so unable to decentralize the technology, for we have the numbers and resource to do so? I suppose that is and always has been the power of the inner rings, the ability to make themselves seem more than they actually are and how weak and effectual we are in the outer rings. Even more ominous the inner most ring, “One Ring to rule them all. One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them”. Let’s all kiss the ring of power, as was done throughout history with: one false king after another, one false emperor after another. All glittering statues with feet of clay. All doomed to fall and fall they all have. Then the draw of the magic of the one ring draws us in and we all help to build another chimeric statue upon the same feet of clay and on the hand we place the ring of power. This I find the most confusing.
As you say, I have probably read this story one too many times and predisposes my mind to flights of fancy.
Thanks for that! I think your point about centralisation is well-made. I believe the industrial age with its economies of scale has accelerated that trend in industry, commerce and government. I see AI (acquired ignorance) and information technology in general as a useful tool like any other - capable of both good and evil.
For example, many of us have become slaves to our mobile devices and that opens up opportunities for control and propaganda that would have delighted the kings of old. Remember this is new compared to the age of humanity - the printing press was roundly condemned when it was new by the tribe that feared its power.
There will be tribes for as long as there are humans and these tribes will always follow charismatic and persuasive leaders. I believe we can accommodate this tendency before it wipes us all out, but not under the conventional systems of government.
Thanks for this detailed summary. Sasha Latypova read the same report and concluded that Covid was a chemical aerosol!
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/covid-was-a-chemical-aerosol?r=peo1w&utm_medium=ios
There are people who will tell you that SARS-CoV-2 is/was a uniquely deadly virus which arose naturally (most likely as a result of human encroachment on natural systems?) and that it was responsible for millions of deaths around the world. Among these people there are politicians, experts, advisers, celebrities, media personalities and members of the public who wanted us all to know just how dangerous this thing was and how many lives were lost to it.
There are also many people, like yourself Jaime (great summary, thanks!) and like us folk commenting here, who believe something different.
Both groups agree that terrible damage was done to humanity over a period starting in early 2020 and usually referred to as 'Covid' or 'The Pandemic'.
Here's one thing about the people in the first group that I cannot get my head around. Why are they not incensed when it's finally admitted that the virus they believe to have killed millions, was actually created by known individuals, funded by known organisations? If they truly believe millions died when infected with this virus, then why are they not now screaming for the prosecution of those who created it?
Could it be that their disdain for those of us in the second group is so strong that they simply cannot bring themselves to admit to sharing any common ground with us? To the extent that they would rather allow the people responsible for all the deaths they believe it caused, to go unpunished?
There is no evidence at all that SARS-CoV-2 was a zoonosis. 'Proximal Origins' was a scientific fraud. Many of the people who state that Covid was a deadly zoonosis know that it was neither particularly deadly nor of natural origin. Those people are heavily invested in the scam political response to the virus and they should be in prison. Anyone else who still believes that SC-2 was a virus which jumped from animals to humans is either deluded or perennially stupid.
The evidence that SC-2 was a bio-engineered virus is now beyond all doubt, not just because of this latest document release. There is a mass of genetic/biological/pathological data and evidence, plus other documentation in the public sphere which proves conclusively that SC-2 was man-made and that it was the gain of function genetically engineered S1/S2 spike incorporating a furin cleavage site, unique among known beta coronaviruses, which was responsible for the harm it caused to a minority of susceptible individuals.
There are those who believe that SC-2 never existed as a unique virus and that 'gain of function' is a myth. Their position is now untenable.
It is going to take a lot of resolve to carry this message forward. But this may be the most important message so far in this century. A “virus” that destroyed individuals, people, families, businesses, economic systems, rights, freedoms. This needs to be ridden hard.
Nice summary.
As you know, these moronic , (the followers),and criminal (the instigators), behavior permeates all governments, and most other organizations. I don't know how we continue without real accountability. Things may have to get uncomfortable.
I never know what to believe these days. Not a lot in fact.
I hear you!
Let us count the ways the US govt has lied to its people:
Gulf of Tonkin
murders of JFK, RFK, and MLK
USS Liberty
911
WMD's in Iraq
Syrian gas attacks
Russiagate
Ukraine
Covid
Murder of Charlie Kirk
And these are only the ones we know about. No doubt there are dozens of other lies they've told. It's time for accountability and retribution!
I think we're in fantasy land. Has Disney taken over the world?
Chalk up a big vindication for the conspiracy theorists!
It’s shocking how little mention there is of these revelations in the corrupt MSM. Let’s hope the Trump administration makes a big thing of it. Ditto the Russians who vehemently objected to all the US biolabs sited just over their border in Ukraine but were fobbed off by Biden and the deep state blob. The Russians even took it to the UN and Russia’s General Igor Kirillov who led the investigation into Ukraine biolabs was assassinated, most likely on the orders of the deep state.
US attorney Jeff Childers devotes his Saturday newsletter to the revelations, with an endpiece signalling US withdrawal from the proxy war against Russia in Ukraine: https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/going-viral-saturday-june-13-2026.
Dougie - thanks for that link. Found this partial quote interesting/sinister -
"In the weeks that followed, the Russians showed the Security Council evidence like a Ukrainian email asking a Turkish drone manufacturer whether its products could “carry 20 liters of aerosolized payload to a range of 300 kilometers – putting them in range of a dozen major Russian cities.” They also provided a June 2019 guidance from Ukraine’s Public Health Ministry that insisted on secrecy —not exactly what you insist on when everything is on the up-and-up— and that required “serious” adverse incidents “including the death of the subjects” to be reported to US authorities within 24 hours."
Yep. I called it. I was ostracized and humiliated. Then people started dying and maybe they thought I wasn’t so crazy after all.
We live in a technocracy run by middle manager types who are interested only in stabbing each other in the back to obtain promotion. They rely on those boffin chappies to tell them what's cool in (bio)science and they haven't a clue whether what they're told is right, wrong or just misleading.
None of them either as an individual or as a group is capable of handling the problems that a technological society throws up. This is our doom (OK I've been watching Lord of the Rings again).
Until we can find a political system under which good policy is made in response to novel and complex problems, we are fated to spiral down to complete collapse. Have a nice day.
I have always loved "The Lord of the Rings". The more complete couplet related to the rings of power was:
"Three Rings for the Elven-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die,
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
One Ring to rule them all. One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie."
The idea of rings of power is as old as history. If you are of the conspiracy mindset, I must say, that I am more and more of that way of thinking, it was codified by the Jesuits (probably just borrowed from fertile historical bias). Generally control and information flows towards the inner rings. The more distal rings are more and more about service and subservience to the inner rings and propaganda and lies to keep them in that state.
If you are to draw a more modern connection, the controllers of AI centres maybe close to the Elven-kings. I don’t even know why the general public does not see why the centralization of this very invasive technology (even if it is not so intelligent yet) can be use to enslave us all (the mortal men doomed to die). Why are we so unable to decentralize the technology, for we have the numbers and resource to do so? I suppose that is and always has been the power of the inner rings, the ability to make themselves seem more than they actually are and how weak and effectual we are in the outer rings. Even more ominous the inner most ring, “One Ring to rule them all. One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them”. Let’s all kiss the ring of power, as was done throughout history with: one false king after another, one false emperor after another. All glittering statues with feet of clay. All doomed to fall and fall they all have. Then the draw of the magic of the one ring draws us in and we all help to build another chimeric statue upon the same feet of clay and on the hand we place the ring of power. This I find the most confusing.
As you say, I have probably read this story one too many times and predisposes my mind to flights of fancy.
Thanks for that! I think your point about centralisation is well-made. I believe the industrial age with its economies of scale has accelerated that trend in industry, commerce and government. I see AI (acquired ignorance) and information technology in general as a useful tool like any other - capable of both good and evil.
For example, many of us have become slaves to our mobile devices and that opens up opportunities for control and propaganda that would have delighted the kings of old. Remember this is new compared to the age of humanity - the printing press was roundly condemned when it was new by the tribe that feared its power.
There will be tribes for as long as there are humans and these tribes will always follow charismatic and persuasive leaders. I believe we can accommodate this tendency before it wipes us all out, but not under the conventional systems of government.