Did The CPS Prevent Merseyside Police From Uncovering The Terrorist Motivation For The Southport Massacre?
That is the startling question we must ask ourselves in the light of this:
‘Looks like terrorism and sounds like terrorism'.’ said DCI Pye. But the CPS said no, it’s not terrorism, meaning that the police only had 72 hours to question the suspect before charging him whereas, if the attack had been treated as a suspected act of terror, then police officers would have had up to 14 days to question the suspect. Bear in mind, at this point, the ricin and the terror manual had already been found in the suspect’s bedroom, and the police were well aware of the fact that he’d been referred to Prevent three times, so clearly there were grounds to suspect it was an act of terror.
What am I missing here? Why did the CPS immediately conclude it was not an act of terror? Surely, the whole point of being able to question the suspect for 14 days as opposed to just 3 days, before pressing charges, is to assist the investigating team to establish a political/ideological motivation for the crime. However, the CPS intervened quickly, severely curtailing the time available for the police to question the suspect and thus possibly prevented the investigating team from uncovering a political/ideological motive for the attacks, therefore preventing the police from charging Rudakubana under the Terrorism Act.
WHY WOULD THE CPS DO THAT?
WAS THE CPS ACTING UNDER ORDERS FROM STARMER?
These are the questions we should be asking. The cover up is not over, as suggested by Nigel Farage on X:
There’s a lot more waiting to be exposed.
For what it's worth, Nigel Farage has called for the Director of Public Prosecutions at the CPS to resign: https://x.com/reformparty_uk/status/1882499278578360432
Here’s my take from across the pond. Your government is not trying to do the right thing for anyone other than the cabal, Agenda 2030, etc. It’s no different than any other country save for the USA and I’m still holding my breath to see how we progress but it’s looking better for certain.
What George Soros did in as many states as he could was to make sure the elected officials were going to be not just soft on crime but to make the innocent victims the ones who suffer. Another example is California, they decriminalized shoplifting so as long as you don’t steal over $975 worth of items you can go free. How about the AirBnB owners that had people takeover the home/apartment and when the homeowner’s call the police, the police arrest the homeowner. It’s totally asinine. But that is the goal…anarchy and chaos which ultimately leads to demoralization of the society. All by design.