Covid 'Vaccines': You Really Don't Want To Follow The Science. Look Away Now.
If you've been jabbed, you probably don't want to know this. If you have or haven't been jabbed, then they don't want you to know this. So it's probably best you don't read this.
For the small number of feline readers whose curiosity almost always gets the better of them, I shall continue now and try to communicate the main findings of a very technical recently published preprint authored by Kevin McKernan, Anthony M. Kyriakopoulos and Peter A. McCullough.
It is entitled 'Differences in Vaccine and SARS-CoV-2 Replication Derived mRNA: Implications for Cell Biology and Future Disease' . . . . . which doesn't give much away. You have to actually read the paper and much of it is incomprehensible unfortunately because of the complexity of the science involved and the use of unfamiliar technical terms. But I slogged on regardless, cherry-picking the more comprehensible plain English passages, to arrive at what I think is a representative summary of the science.
By doing so, I myself risk doing something which the authors warn about in their introduction: creating a false consensus, alternatively known as introducing confirmation bias. So I strongly advise the reader to attempt for themselves to go through the actual preprint and to seek alternative explanations/interpretations of the text.
SARS-CoV-2 is a retrovirus, meaning that it exists in the form of RNA which invades the host cell and, using an enzyme known as reverse transcriptase, transforms itself to DNA in order to replicate. Included in the set of instructions for the replication of the whole virus from RNA to DNA is a little sequence coding for the dreaded S1/S2 full length so called 'spike protein' which is on the surface of the virus and plays a vital role in allowing the virus to attach itself to host cells.
So, if you're still with me, the Covid mRNA 'vaccines' introduce into your body millions and millions of little pieces of messenger RNA which code for the formation of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. These tiny foreign mRNA segments are enclosed in lipid nanoparticles so as to avoid them being immediately destroyed by your body's natural defences. The lipids find their way into your cells, release their little package of messenger RNA and hey presto, the cell nucleus obligingly begins the manufacture of spike proteins, the antigen which the 'vaccines' require to elicit a supposedly 'safe and effective' controlled immune response to SARS-CoV-2, without the risk of a full viral infection. That's the theory. They didn't much test the theory, but that's another story.
The whole technical process of producing an injectable synthetic mRNA which codes for the production viral spike proteins is known as codon optimization, so this statement by the authors should now be reasonably intelligible:
They're basically saying that the artificially manufactured spike protein may not necessarily be biochemically identical to the native viral spike protein and may in fact function slightly differently to the viral spike, once inside the body. Nobody knows for sure of course. This is all pretty novel stuff, cutting edge science. That's why, if you got jabbed, you are part of the answer and thus your body is a part of the grand experiment currently being conducted upon humanity by a megalomanic software developer and billionaire friends. Isn't that exciting? Not that the Jab fanatics would agree. As far as they're concerned, this is the most safe, effective, rigorously tested vaccine evah!TM in the history of medicine and anyone who doesn't line up for pricks one, two, three and even four is a nutty 'anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist' and a granny-killer who should be banished from society forever, complete with frozen bank account and head trampled by police horse's hooves.
The authors actually analysed the native and vaccine spike proteins using open source software and they found distinct structural differences:
One consequence of these structural changes is that both the synthetic vaccine mRNA and the vaccine-derived spike are more robust inside the body. We've already seen that they have been observed to be extraordinarily persistent in lymph nodes. This could be a problem as regards the innate and adaptive immune response of the person who's been jabbed. We've had hints of this occurring via data from the UKHSA, re. nucleocapsid immune response. The authors write:
Herpes Zoster is shingles, which is the re-activation of the chickenpox virus, latent in the body following childhood chickenpox infection. It usually occurs as a result of the immune system becoming temporarily depressed. I got it once when I was feeling particularly down. Despite efforts to deny it happening, it is a documented fact that many people are developing shingles post vaccination, suggesting that the body's immune defences are being undermined.
Then there's the possibility of the 'vaccines' being implicated in the re-emergence of cancers in remission or even causing new cancers. Steve Kirsch got booted off Twitter for writing about this potentially extremely serious occurrence. Twitter would rather risk lives and neuter 'vaccine hesitancy' via sledgehammer censorship than let users stray from the official narrative by actually following the emerging science.
The spike protein, even the native spike protein in infected patients, has been found to persist for 15 months. How long does the vaccine-derived spike protein, which is more robust, and produced in numbers an order of magnitude greater than is seen during natural infection, persist? Nobody knows for sure. The vaccines have not been tested long enough to find out, but it stands to reason that if you keep jabbing people with this stuff every few months, then it's going to be topped up and hang around for longer than it would do otherwise.
You'll note that the authors also talk about the possibility of toxic spike proteins actually being exhaled by vaccinated persons. Might this explain why some unjabbed women have reported disruptions to their periods following contacting with jabbed work colleagues, friends or family? Who knows. Nobody knows. That's the point.
The authors reaffirm that the spike protein - both native and vaccine-expressed - is indeed highly toxic, not just in one specific way, but in several.
The above explains the hyper-coagulatory and inflammatory aspects of the spike, but the authors also repeat the warning about possible carcinogenic effects:
All in all, it's not good news, but the concluding remarks of this paper are staggering and self explanatory:
The Quantities of Vaccine Spikes Massively Outweigh Infection and the Way they are Introduced into the Body is Very Different
Breath-taking Medical Negligence and Political Malfeasance
The UK government just authorised these shots for 5-11 year olds, who 100% without a doubt do not need them. Think about that.