Cell Preprint Study Reveals Catastrophic Levels Of Spike Protein In Vaccinated
The smoking gun of the entire mass vaccination exercise has been the spike protein, the antigen used exclusively by the vaccines to elicit an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, the antigen which the mRNA or DNA contained in the vaccines causes the body's cells to manufacture in prodigious quantities. Proven to be cyto-toxic and hyper-inflammatory, the vaccine manufacturers, mass jabbing fanatics and 'fact'-checkers have argued, increasingly unconvincingly, that it is quickly destroyed in the body, does not enter the general (blood) circulation and thus is unable to do the damage which it demonstrably does in seriously ill Covid patients.
To a large extent, severe Covid is infection of the blood and organs by extremely toxic, uniquely hyper-inflammatory spike proteins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. That's what causes the real damage, not the whole virus. The almost certainly genetically engineered spike on the surface of the SC-2 virus, in severe Covid cases, where the virus multiplies rapidly, breaks away from the virus and lodges itself in many organs of the body (including the brain, heart, ovaries and testes).
Fast forward, quick rewind, slow motion; now we can see the actual bullet emerging from the mass vax gun, and it's ugly - a high-explosive, incendiary, armour piercing, bio-weapon which 'they' said would protect us, protect granny and even stop us infecting poor old granny, our family, our friends and even Joe Bloggs in the coffee shop. They lied. We now know they lied. They are busy trying to cover up those lies by censoring all 'misinformation' that they possibly can and by applying to the courts to delay publication of the Phase 3 trial data for many, many years - which data medicines regulators used to justify emergency use authorisations worldwide.
So where's the bullet? It's here. And here.
Robert Malone says, referring to the recently published pre-print study in Cell:
Highlights (per the journal)
Vaccination confers broader IgG binding of variant RBDs than SARS-CoV-2 infection
Imprinting from initial antigen exposures alters IgG responses to viral variants
Histology of mRNA vaccinee lymph nodes shows abundant germinal centers
Vaccine spike antigen and mRNA persist for weeks in lymph node germinal centers
The hidden highlight (lede) buried in this peer reviewed paper is that protein production of spike in people vaccinated with the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine is higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients! A person might ask, “How could that be?” In order to understand this, we must carefully analyze what the study shows.
What does that statement mean, really, actually? What it means is that healthy, non-vulnerable people who would otherwise be very unlikely to suffer serious disease - and hence widespread damage from circulating spike proteins - will, if they get vaccinated, not only likely suffer the damaging effects of spike proteins being manufactured by their own body, but that the amounts of spike protein circulating in their system and lodging in their organs may actually exceed those levels typically seen in severe infections! In those cases, which we have abundant data which prove beyond reasonable doubt are not 'extremely rare', the 'cure' is much worse than the disease and the likelihood of that 'cure' causing major problems or even death is significantly greater than natural infection causing serious disease.
What it means is that repeated 'boosters' will result in yet more damage by spike proteins, and this damage may be cumulative and irreversible. Israel is on its fourth booster and 'Covid deaths' are heading off the scale.
Robert points out that the mRNA and spike proteins hang around in the lymph centres for weeks, which he claims is highly unusual and proffers an explanation:
This study asserts that the mRNA and the spike protein produced persists for weeks in lymph node germinal centers in human patients. Having worked with mRNA for decades, I can attest that this is highly unusual.
One very real hypothesis is that the substitution of pseudouridine for uridine to avoid the immune response is working so well that the mRNA is completely evading the normal clearance/degradation pathways. Hence, mRNA that is not being incorporated into cells at the injection site, is migrating to the lymph nodes (and throughout the body as the non-clinical Pfizer data suggest?) and continuing to express protein there. In this case, the cytotoxic protein antigen is spike. Spike protein can be detected for at least 60 days after administration of dose. Note that the duration of the protein expression was only tested for 60 days.
Then he puts the boot in, quite rightly. With over a billion people having been injected with these 'vaccines', often under extreme coercion, compulsion or even force, the revelation of these findings, only now, is nothing short of the biggest public health scandal ever, in the history of medicine, indeed human civilisation:
Knowing what we know about the spike protein in these vaccines, the study quantitatively measured spike protein levels in plasma after vaccination. Which, it turns out, are higher than the levels observed in a person with a severe COVID-19 infection. Just to write it, the fact that this only now being discovered or it it was known, released to the public is criminal in my opinion. This should have been characterized long ago, including prior to beginning human clinical trials.
That this has not been published or investigated more demonstrates the gross regulatory dereliction of duty by Pfizer, Biointech, Moderna, NIAID VRC and that whole crew. Using these vaccines, which include pseudouridine without fully understanding the implications and without the FDA requiring a complete pre-clinical toxicology regulatory package, including long-term follow-up, as is done with any other unique chemical or adjuvant additive is shocking. Then there is the novel use of the unique nano particles being used in these vaccines, which also were only marginally assessed, as shown by the Japanese Pfizer data.
Finally, Robert points out something which I've been saying recently, and which qualified medics have been pointing out for many months - these 'vaccines' do not elicit an effective mucosal immune response and therefore cannot prevent infection and transmission of a respiratory virus.
The paper also notes that the antibody response is IgG, not IgA or IgM. IgA and IgM antibodies produce a strong mucosal immune response needed for respiratory diseases, unlike IgG.
I haven't read the actual paper yet, but I will and will reveal any more horrors which lurk therein.