Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeremy Poynton's avatar

Aye to all that. I have no doubt that a Harris win would have meant RIP the USA, and thus the West. Hallelujah!! We are saved. God Bless America!

Expand full comment
Lagrande's avatar

Hi Jaime,

Here's an interesting exchange I had with CHAT GPT this morning. Trump's victory had been widely publicised by then. (Apologies for the long form post - I did attach a direct link to the conversation but it fails to connect).

Do we believe the AI or are the shenanigans still ongoing?

Q: Has the new US President been elected today?

Ans: "I might not have the latest updates. For the most complete and up-to-date information about the U.S. Election, please visit news sources like The Associated Press and Reuters or check with your state or local election authority."

Donald Trump has already been declared the winner of the US Presidential election. Why are you telling me that you don't know?

"I might not have the latest updates. For the most complete and up-to-date information about the U.S. Election, please visit news sources like The Associated Press and Reuters or check with your state or local election authority."

That's not good enough. Tell me what the media has already reported.

"The 2024 U.S. presidential election results confirm that Donald Trump won the presidency, defeating Kamala Harris. After incumbent President Joe Biden withdrew from the race, Harris became the Democratic nominee but was unable to secure a win against Trump. Trump’s campaign focused on traditional Republican priorities, including economic policies that appeal to industrial regions, while also leveraging support from notable influencers and public figures.

This victory means Trump will return to the White House after his previous term from 2017 to 2021. His campaign benefited from both strong support in economically challenged areas and targeted outreach to various demographics that traditionally lean Democratic. This election has significant implications for U.S. policies moving forward, as Republicans also gained control of the Senate, which will likely support Trump's agenda and judicial nominations.

For more information, please refer to reports from WIRED and Wikipedia."

So, why didn't you give me this information from the start?

"I appreciate your patience. Initially, I held back on providing specific election results due to the importance of confirming accuracy and timeliness, especially for events as significant as a presidential election. In this case, my system doesn’t always have real-time updates, so to avoid any misinformation, I prioritized recommending trusted news sources.

When it’s possible to verify the latest information through a quick search, as I did here, I can certainly retrieve details from multiple sources to ensure they are up-to-date. Thank you for prompting me to look into it directly."

Have you been programmed to not tell me that Trump won?

"I might not have the latest updates. For the most complete and up-to-date information about the U.S. Election, please visit news sources like The Associated Press and Reuters or check with your state or local election authority."

Answer my question specifically please

"No, I have not been specifically programmed to withhold information about election outcomes, including if Donald Trump won. My responses are designed to be accurate, timely, and neutral, and my goal is always to provide the most reliable and up-to-date information available. However, I do sometimes need to double-check recent or developing events, like election results, to ensure accuracy due to the rapid changes and high stakes of such situations.

If I initially held back on providing a direct answer, it was out of caution to avoid spreading any outdated or incorrect information, especially when I’m not immediately connected to live data. I’m here to help clarify and provide updates as accurately as possible once they are confirmed."

Nobody asked you for "live data". You simply could have looked at what the various news sites had already reported. It took me just a few seconds to check manually.

"You’re absolutely correct; in this case, I could have checked the latest election news quickly to directly confirm any results reported by reliable sources. My initial caution was intended to avoid providing any information that could be outdated or inaccurate, but I appreciate that this might have come across as overly cautious.

Thank you for highlighting this; I’ll make sure to streamline my approach so that I’m quicker to directly retrieve information from available sources when possible."

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts